比较视觉搜索任务中工作记忆最小化的眼动研究*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 49-53.

比较视觉搜索任务中工作记忆最小化的眼动研究*

苏娟^1,2, 白学军¹, 王超³, 阴国恩¹,

1教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074
2 内蒙古财经大学统计与数学学院,呼和浩特 010070
3 麦克马斯特大学心理神经科学与行为系,加拿大 L8S 4L8

收稿日期:2016-11-14 出版日期:2017-01-20 发布日期:2017-03-02
通讯作者: 阴国恩,E-mail: yinguoen@mail.tjnu.edu.cn。
基金资助:
天津市高等学校心理健康与行为调控创新团队（39）、天津市科技计划项目（12ZCZDSF07100）和国家自然科学基金项目（81471629）

Minimal Use of Working Memory in a Comparative Search for Feature Differences

Su Juan^1,2, Bai Xuejun¹, Wang Chao³, Yin Guo'en¹

1 Academy of psychology and behavior, Tianjin normal university, Tianjin 300074;
2 Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, Inner Mongolia of Finance and Economics University, Hohhot 010070;
3 Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Canada

Received:2016-11-14 Online:2017-01-20 Published:2017-03-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用比较视觉搜索任务和眼动追踪技术,通过增加组成图片的图形数量和改变不同图形的特征属性,考察比较视觉搜索任务是否遵循工作记忆最小化原则以及图形特征加工的优先性问题。结果表明图形数量的增加不影响平均每次注视的图形数量,被试平均每次注视1.65个图形,即比较视觉搜索任务仍遵循工作记忆最小化原则。不同图形中颜色和形状都不同的注视时间最短,颜色不同和形状不同在注视时间上差异不显著,表明比较视觉搜索任务中特征维度数量比特征性质在引导注意上具有优先性。事先不规定搜索路径的情况下,被试主要采用系统搜索策略完成比较搜索任务。

关键词: 比较视觉搜索任务, 工作记忆最小化, 眼动

Abstract: We manipulated the display size and object identities to investigate whether the comparative search task follows minimal use of working memory and priority for processing features using eye tracking. The number of fixations per scene glance suggested that on average, 1.65 objects per fixation were encoded and maintained in visual working memory despite increased display size. Fixation times were shorter for redundant trials than for color-only and shape-only trials, and no difference between color-only and shape-only trials. These results demonstrated that the number of features is of greater attentional priority than feature characteristics. Participants mostly used systematic search strategy to complete the tasks when they were provided no instruction regarding the visual-spatial processing strategy they were to employ.

Key words: comparative search task, minimal use of working memory, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842.3

苏娟, 白学军, 王超, 阴国恩,. 比较视觉搜索任务中工作记忆最小化的眼动研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(1): 49-53.

Su Juan, Bai Xuejun, Wang Chao, Yin Guo'en. Minimal Use of Working Memory in a Comparative Search for Feature Differences[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(1): 49-53.

参考文献

1 张豹, 黄赛.(2013). 工作记忆表征对视觉注意的引导机制. 心理科学进展, 21(9), 1578-1584.
2 张豹, 黄赛, 候秋霞.(2014). 工作记忆表征捕获眼动中的颜色优先性. 心理学报, 46(1), 17-26.
3 Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N.(1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(5), 723-767.
4 Bauhoff, V., Huff, M., & Schwan S.(2011). The effect of temporal distance on comparative visual search. Journal of vision, 23(3), 1325-1333.
5 Bauhoff, V., Huff, M., & Schwan S.(2012). Distance matters: spatial contiguity effects as trade-off between gaze switches and memory load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 863-871.
6 Drury, C.(1978). Integrating human factors models into statistical quality control. Human Factors, 20(5), 521-528.
7 Fournier, L. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Bowd, C.(1998). Multiple-feature discrimination faster than single-feature discrimination within the same object? Perception & Psychophysics, 60(8), 1384-1405.
8 Gajewski, D. A., & Henderson, J. M.(2005). Minimal use of working memory in a scene comparison task. Visual Congnition, 12(6), 979-1002.
9 Galpin, A. J., & Underwood, G.(2005). Eye movements during search and detection in comparative visual search. Peception & Psychophsice, 67(8), 1313-1331.
10 Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G., & Ballard, D. H.(1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research, 38(2), 125-137.
11 Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M.(2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
12 Irwin, D. E.(1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 307-317.
13 Pomplun, M., Sichelschmidt, L., Wagner, K., Clermont, T., Rickheit, G., & Ritter, H.(2001). Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science, 25, 3-36.
14 Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby. J., & Clifton, C. J.(Eds.),(2012). Psychology of reading.(pp. 9). Taylor & Francis Group: Psychology Press.
15 Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G.W., & Blanco, M. J.(2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248-261.
16 Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D.(2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46(6-7), 1010-1018.
17 Vera, B., Markus, H., & Stephan, S.(2015). The influence of expertise on comparative visual search performance. Annals of Leisure Research, 7, 1-3.
18 Vera, B., Markus, H., & Stephan, S.(2011). Effects of split attention revisited: A new display technology for troubleshooting tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1254-1261.
19 Wang, J. H., Matthew H. S., Pavlo D. A., Chen, C., & Marc, P.(2016). Is reading impairment associated with enhanced holistic processing in comparative visual search? Dyslexia, 22, 345-361.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[5]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[6]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[7]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[8]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[9]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[10]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[11]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[12]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.
[13]	康立超, 兰泽波, 韩映虹. 不同阅读方式下图画书重复阅读对4～5岁幼儿文字关注影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 368-374.
[14]	何立媛, 田雪, 李悦, 沈凤丹, 王永胜, 吴捷. 无关言语影响老年人阅读过程的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 375-381.
[15]	乌仁其木格, 赵傲雪, 汪钰涵, 庄想灵, 马国杰. “找茬”任务中的视野偏好与参照策略[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 166-171.