不同亚型社会退缩幼儿在四种故事情境中的社会信息加工特点与差异*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (4): 506-514.

不同亚型社会退缩幼儿在四种故事情境中的社会信息加工特点与差异^*

左恩玲^1,2, 张向葵¹, ³, 田金来⁴, 赵悦彤¹

1 东北师范大学心理学院,长春 130024
2 长春师范大学教育科学学院,长春 130032
3 东北师范大学儿童发展研究中心,长春 130024
4 北华大学教育科学学院,吉林 132013

收稿日期:2016-08-18 出版日期:2017-07-20 发布日期:2017-10-10
通讯作者: 张向葵,E-mail：zhangxiangkui@126.com。
基金资助:
长春师范大学科研基金项目（长师大社科合字[2015第001号]）、奕阳教育研究院青年学者学术研究资助项目（SEI-QXZ-2015-002）

The Characteristics and Differences of Social Information Processing of Different Subtypes of Social Withdrawal Children in Four Story Situations

Zuo Enling^1,2, Zhang Xiangkui^1,3, Tian Jinlai⁴, Zhao Yuetong¹

1 Northeast Normal University, Faculty of Psychology, Changchun 130024;
2 Changchun Normal University, Faculty of Education, Changchun 130032;
3 Northeast Normal University, Child Development Research Center, Changchun 130024;
4 Beihua University, Faculty of Education, Jinlin 132013

Received:2016-08-18 Online:2017-07-20 Published:2017-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用《游戏观察量表》和《社会信息加工访谈—幼儿版》（中文版）对316名3-6岁城市幼儿进行测查,以探究不同亚型社会退缩幼儿（抑制行为组、安静退缩组、活跃退缩组）和对照组幼儿在社会信息加工各个阶段（编码、解释、反应生成、反应评价和行为表现）上的特点与差异。结果表明：（1）社会退缩幼儿的编码能力显著低于对照组幼儿,而不同亚型退缩组之间无显著差异,且这一特点具有跨情境的一致性;（2）社会退缩幼儿的反应数量生成能力显著低于对照组幼儿,而不同亚型退缩组之间无显著差异,这一特点体现在敌意拒绝故事和非敌意挑衅故事情境中;（3）在非敌意拒绝故事和非敌意挑衅故事情境中,社会退缩幼儿的反应类型生成能力差异显著,且这种差异依反应类型不同而呈现不同特征。

关键词: 社会退缩, 幼儿, 社会信息加工, 编码, 反应生成

Abstract: 316 children aged 3-6 years old were investigated by using the The Play Observation Scale(POS) (Revised 2008)and Social Information Processing Interview-preschool version(Chinese version)to explore the characteristics and differences at each stage(encoding of cues, interpretation of cues, response access or construction, response decision and behavioral enactment)of social information processing of different subtypes of social withdrawal children(Inhibitory Behavior, Passive Isolation and Active Isolation)and the control group. Results show: 1)The coding ability of social withdrawal children is significantly lower than that of the control group,but there was no significant difference between the different subgroups, and this trait is consistent across situations; 2)The ability of response number of social withdrawal children is significantly lower than that of the control group, but there was no significant difference between the different subgroups, this feature is in the context of hostile rejection and non-hostile provocation; 3)In the context of non-hostile rejection and non-hostile provocation, the ability of response type of social withdrawal children is significantly different,and this difference varies depending on response type.

Key words: social withdrawal, preschool children, social information processing, encoding, response access or construction

中图分类号:

B844.1

左恩玲, 张向葵, , 田金来, 赵悦彤. 不同亚型社会退缩幼儿在四种故事情境中的社会信息加工特点与差异^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 506-514.

Zuo Enling, Zhang Xiangkui, Tian Jinlai, Zhao Yuetong. The Characteristics and Differences of Social Information Processing of Different Subtypes of Social Withdrawal Children in Four Story Situations[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(4): 506-514.

参考文献

1 池丽萍, 辛自强.(2004). 儿童社会认知发展研究:过程观与结构观及其整合. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 6(1), 61-68.
2 龚柳娟, 金浩, 王滨.(1997). 幼儿角色游戏水平及一般发展趋势的调查研究. 上海教育科研, 1, 47-49.
3 史悦, 刘俊升.(2014). 不同类型社会退缩儿童人际冲突应对策略的差异: 个体为中心的分析. 教育生物学杂志, 2(3), 157-162.
4 孙铃, 陈会昌, 彭晓明, 陈欣银.(2005). 儿童早期到中期社交退缩行为的发展. 心理发展与教育, 21(4), 19-23.
5 孙铃, 陈会昌, 郑淑杰, 单玲, 陈欣银.(2006). 学前儿童社交退缩类型与气质. 中国心理卫生杂志, 20(5), 288-290.
6 叶平枝, 冯晓霞.(2007). 社会退缩与儿童发展关系研究的回顾与展望. 学前教育研究,(11), 18-22.
7 于增艳, 刘爱书.(2011). 儿童中期社交退缩亚类型的社会信息加工特点. 中国健康心理学志, 19(4), 441-443.
8 张光珍, 梁宗保, 陈会昌, 陈欣银, 张萍.(2013). 社交退缩与儿童的社会适应之间的关系: 性别的调节作用.心理科学, 36(4), 860-864.
9 张文新.(2000). 儿童社会性发展. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
10 郑淑杰.(2003). 学前儿童社会退缩行为的影响因素、亚类型及其行为适应(博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.
11 左恩玲.(2016). 儿童社会退缩的亚型、特征与干预. 长春师范大学学报, 35(3), 22-26.
12 Burgess, K. B., Wojslawowicz, J. C., Rubin, K. H., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Booth-LaForce, C.(2006). Social information processing and coping strategies of shy/withdrawn and aggressive children: Does friendship matter? Child Development, 77(2), 371-383.
13 Coplan, R. J., Rubin, K. H., Fox, N. A., et al.(1994). Being alone, playing alone, and acting alone: Distinguishing among reticence and passive and active solitude in young children. Child Development, 65, 129-137.
14 Coplan, R. J., Rose-Krasnor, L., Weeks, M., Kingsbury, A, Kingsbury, M., et al.(2013). Alone is a crowd: Social motivations, social withdrawal, and socioemotional functioning in later childhood. Developmental Psychology, 49(5): 861-875.
15 Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A.(1994). A review and reformulation of social-information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.
16 Dodge, K. A.(2006). Transitional science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 791-814.
17 Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R.(1996). Children′s social goals and self-efficacy perceptions as influences on their responses to ambiguous provocation. Child Development, 67(4), 1329-1344.
18 Harrist, A. W., Zaia, A. F., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S..(1997). Subtypes of social withdrawal of early childhood:Sociometric status and social cognitive differences across four years. Child Development, 68(2), 278-294.
19 Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., & Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A.(2002). Changes in children′s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509-527.
20 Ladd, G. W.(2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12: An examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77, 822-846.
21 Lerner, J. A., Inui, T. S., Trupin, E. W., Douglas, E.(1985). Preschool behavior can predict future psychiatric disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24, 42-48.
22 Rubin, K. H. The Play Observation Scale(Revised 2008). University of Maryland.
23 Rubin, K. H., & Asendorpf, J.(1993). Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood: Conceptual and definitional issues. In: K. H. Rubin, & J. B. Asendorpf(Eds). Social withdrawal. Inhibition. and shyness in childhood(pp.3-17). Hillsdale. NJ. Erlbaum.
24 Rubin, K. H., Hymel, S., & Mills, R. S. L.(1989). Sociability and social withdrawal in childhood: Stability and outcomes. Journal of Personality, 57, 237-255.
25 Wichmann, C. R., Coplan, J., & Daniels, T.(2004). The social cognitions of socially withdrawn children. Social Development, 13(3), 377-392.
26 Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., Freedman-Doan, C., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Arbreton, A. J., & Blumenfeld, P. C.(1997). Change in children′s competence beliefs in subjectivetask values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
27 Ziv, Y., & Sorongon, A.(2011). Social information processing in preschool children: Relations to sociodemographic risk and problem behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 412-429.

[1]	孙云瑞, 韩映虹, 吕勇, 刘芳. 人格对幼儿白谎行为的影响：“冷”“热”执行功能的并行中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 240-247.
[2]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[3]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[4]	贺晓玲, 刘奕晴, 那琳娜. 3～5岁幼儿颜色映射道德和权力概念的认知发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 636-641.
[5]	黄明明, 陈丽萍, 郭莉萍, 赵守盈. 工作-家庭冲突与幼儿教师离职意向的关系：职业认同感与职业倦怠的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[6]	龚扬, 姜露, 秦雯雯. 祖辈参与教养与幼儿社会能力的关系：母亲育儿压力和母亲教养效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 348-353.
[7]	李甜甜, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 父亲抑郁对幼儿问题行为的影响：教养效能感和教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 66-73.
[8]	潘运, 赵竹君, 戴隆农. 言语与空间任务指令对数字-空间联结编码的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(6): 734-740.
[9]	王嵩, 李甦. 幼儿复述能力的发展及其与言语工作记忆的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 596-602.
[10]	闻明晶, 滕树元, 冯晓杭, 田金来, 张向葵. 祖辈共同养育模式下幼儿母子依恋对问题行为的影响：祖孙依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 208-213.
[11]	臧蓓蕾, 张俊, 顾荣芳. 幼儿心理数线的发展：估计准确率与模式背后的策略[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(6): 795-802.
[12]	刘湍丽, 赵宇飞, 邢敏, 白学军. 编码-提取匹配和线索负荷对部分线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 433-441.
[13]	李昱霖, 杨帆, 王琳, 隋雪. 汉字位置信息加工的脑电变化进程[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 296-303.
[14]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[15]	杨海波, 牛丽丽, 尹莎莎, 白学军. 视觉工作记忆中非语义编码信息对注意捕获的影响：来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.