“动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “动作-评价”效应是具身认知理论的一个重要的支持性证据。早期研究表明，人们倾向于对积极刺激做“拉”反应而对消极刺激做“推”反应，进而在效价评定过程中表现出一种“动作-评价”效应。而随后一系列研究发现该效应的表现模式并非固定，并且该效应的发生不仅限于“推拉”动作。相应的，研究者也对这些现象做出了多种观点解释。进一步研究需继续深入探索“动作-评价”效应的本质及该效应的局限范围，以统合各种观点。

关键词: 具身认知, 推拉动作, 效价评定, &ldquo, 动作-评价&rdquo, 效应, 心理距离

Abstract: “Action-evaluation” effect, an embodiment effect referring to the relationship between pushing-pulling action and evaluation, is an important evidence for embodied cognition theory. Previous research about this effect suggested that a pulling action is related to approaching good objects whereas a pushing action is related to avoiding bad objects. Therefore, using these actions to evaluate the valence of the stimuli could trigger the “action-evaluation” effect. However, later studies found this effect is inherently malleable and can be conditioned. Correspondingly, this effect has been interpreted by several different accounts. Further research could continue to investigate the essence and the boundary of this effect.

Key words: embodied cognition, pushing/pulling action, evaluation, “action-evaluation”effect, psychological distance

中图分类号:

B841

王汉林, 莫雷. “动作-评价”效应：动作与认知的交互作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.

WANG Hanlin, MO Lei. “Action-Evaluation” Effect: The Interaction Between Body Movement and Cognitive Activity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(5): 626-632.

参考文献

鲁忠义, 陈笕桥, 邵一杰. (2009). 语篇理解中动允性信息的提取. 心理学报, 41(9), 793-801.
张晓雯, 禤宇明, 傅小兰. (2012). 情绪效价对趋避反应的作用. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1023-1030.
郑健, 刘力, 史佳鑫, 赵显, 黄桢炜. (2013). 趋利避害相容效应的定义、理论与研究范式. 心理科学进展, 21(9), 1686-1695.
Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328(5986), 1712-1715.
Ambrosini, E., & Costantini, M. (2013). Handles lost in non-reachable space. Experimental Brain Research, 229(2), 197-202.
Bargh, J. A., & Shalev, I. (2012). The substitutability of physical and social warmth in daily life. Emotion, 12(1), 154-162.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Ⅱ. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 5-17.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215-224.
Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1-2), 95-103.
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853-869.
Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262-281.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Holland, R. W., Hendriks, M., & Aarts, H. (2005). Smells like clean spirit: Nonconscious effects of scent on cognition and behavior. Psychological Science, 16(9), 689-693.
IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1214-1220.
Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169-1174.
Krieglmeyer, R., Deutsch, R., De Houwer, J., & De Raedt, R. (2010). Being moved: Valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions. Psychological Science, 21(4), 607-613.
Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1270-1296.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind & its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Science, 328(5979), 709-709.
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C.-B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21(3), 381-383.
Maglio, S. J., & Trope, Y. (2012). Disembodiment: Abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 211-216.
Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6-10.
McCall, C., Tipper, C. M., Blascovich, J., & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Attitudes trigger motor behavior through conditioned associations: Neural and behavioral evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 841-849.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002-1005.
Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P., Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1120-1136.
Roelofs, K., Minelli, A., Mars, R. B., & Toni, I. (2009). On the neural control of social emotional behavior. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 50-58.
Rotteveel, M., & Phaf, R. H. (2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion, 4(2), 156-172.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096-1109.
Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 239-245.
Stepper, S., & Strack, F. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 211-220.
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220-247.
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(3), 281-289.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8(6), 769-800.
van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(9), 1298-1306.
van Dantzig, S., Zeelenberg, R., & Pecher, D. (2009). Unconstraining theories of embodied cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 345-351.
van Peer, J. M., Rotteveel, M., Spinhoven, P., Tollenaar, M. S., & Roelofs, K. (2010). Affect-congruent approach and withdrawal movements of happy and angry faces facilitate affective categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 863-875.
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219-230.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
Zhang, Y. M., Proctor, R. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Approach-avoidance actions or categorization? A matching account of reference valence effects in affective S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 609-616.
Zhong, C.-B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451-1452.

[1]	谭秀娟, 李馨, 白学军. 阅读方式和学习次数对中文词汇的产生效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 600-606.
[2]	李文福, 翟吉存, 李青青, 陈井婷. 自我损耗对科学发明问题解决中原型启发效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 677-683.
[3]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[4]	陈相霖, 张军恒, 晏碧华. 现实场景典型空间位置关系客体的解码效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 441-449.
[5]	仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, 齐琦. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.
[6]	王爱君, 黄杰, 张明. 自我优势效应对远近空间中空间参照框架的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 297-303.
[7]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[8]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[9]	罗利, 杨东, 陈圣栋, 高伟, 陈永强, 袁加锦. 特质敬畏对亲社会倾向的正向预测：自我超越和共情的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 390-396.
[10]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[11]	白慧慧, 王雨晴, 孙婉靖. 留守儿童心理韧性的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 261-267.
[12]	徐慧, 李美佳, 彭华茂. 眼睛注视线索对经济领域风险决策的影响：基于框架效应范式[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 37-44.
[13]	陈艳桃, 高晓彤, 陈兆琳, 黄时华. 基于双因素模型的老年人生命意义感与心理健康：老化态度的中介作用——基于双因素模型的老年人生命意义感与心理健康：老化态度的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 88-95.
[14]	章玉祉, 高异, 张积家. 义符启动范式下义符语义和语法激活的位置效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 721-727.
[15]	任亚萍, 孙岩, 赵雪松. 不同任务框架下自我损耗对自我-他人风险决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 750-756.