失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据

心理与行为研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 592-598.

失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据

刘志方¹, 曾台燊¹, 柴林², 陈朝阳³, 仝文⁴

1. 杭州师范大学心理学系，杭州 311121;
2. 宁波特殊教育中心学校，宁波 315211;
3. 宁波大学心理学系，宁波 315211;
4. 山西师范大学心理学系，临汾 041000

收稿日期:2021-02-22 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-20
通讯作者: 陈朝阳，E-mail：ccy6409@sina.com；刘志方，E-mail：lzhf2008@163.com
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划课题一般项目（BBA190023）

The Characteristics of Word Processing When Deaf Readers Read Chinese: Evidences from Disappearing Text

LIU Zhifang¹, ZENG Taishen¹, CHAI Lin², CHEN Chaoyang³, TONG Wen⁴

1. Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121;
2. Ningbo Special Education Center School, Ningbo 315211;
3. Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211;
4. Department of Psychology , Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000

Received:2021-02-22 Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究采用消失文本范式考察失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工过程特点。实验1操控词n+1呈现方式与组别变量，结果发现，组别和呈现条件交互影响句子总阅读时间，所有消失条件均影响健听组的句子总阅读时间，词n+1上单个汉字消失并不影响失聪学生总阅读时间。实验2操控词n呈现方式与组别变量，结果发现，组别与呈现条件对句子总阅读时间影响的交互作用不显著，词n消失、词n首字消失和词n尾字消失在相同程度上影响各组总阅读时间。综上可知，失聪学生预加工词n+1的过程不同于健听学生；加工注视词汇的过程环节与健听学生没有差异。

关键词: 消失文本, 失聪学生, 阅读, 词汇加工

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to explore whether deaf students process words differently to hearing students in Chinese reading. Experiment 1 was a 4 (disappearing manipulations: control vs. word n+1 disappearing vs. initial character of word n+1 disappearing vs. end character of word n+1 disappearing) × 3 (groups: deaf vs. reading matched hearing vs. age matched hearing) mixed design. The results showed reliable interaction effects for sentence reading time between groups and disappearing manipulations. Word n+1 disappearing impedes reading more seriously than the other disappearing manipulations for the three groups. Experiment 2 was also a 4 (disappearing manipulations: control vs. word n disappearing vs. initial character of word n disappearing vs. end character of word n disappearing) × 3 (groups: deaf vs. reading matched hearing vs. age matched hearing) mixed design. The results showed unreliable interaction effects for sentence reading time between groups and manipulations. The results suggest that deaf readers have enhanced parafoveal character processing ability, and a similarity between deaf and hearing readers in their recognition of multi-character words.

Key words: disappearing text, deaf readers, Chinese reading, word processing

中图分类号:

B842

刘志方, 曾台燊, 柴林, 陈朝阳, 仝文. 失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.

LIU Zhifang, ZENG Taishen, CHAI Lin, CHEN Chaoyang, TONG Wen. The Characteristics of Word Processing When Deaf Readers Read Chinese: Evidences from Disappearing Text[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.

参考文献

贺荟中, 贺利中. (2007). 聋生篇章阅读过程的眼动研究. 中国特殊教育, (11), 31–35.
刘璐, 闫国利. (2018). 聋人阅读中的副中央凹视觉注意增强效应——来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 50(7), 715–726.
刘志方, 张智君, 潘运, 仝文, 苏衡. (2017). 中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码的过程特点: 来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 49(7), 853–865.
乔静芝, 张兰兰, 闫国利. (2011). 聋人与健听大学生汉语阅读知觉广度的比较研究. 应用心理学, 17(3), 249–258, 264.
张学新, 方卓, 杜英春, 孔令跃, 张钦, 邢强. (2012). 顶中区N200: 一个中文视觉词汇识别特有的脑电反应. 科学通报, 57(5), 332−347.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48, doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bélanger, N. N., Baum, S. R., & Mayberry, R. I. (2012). Reading difficulties in adult deaf readers of French: Phonological codes, not guilty! Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 263–285, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.568555.
Bélanger, N. N., Slattery, T. J., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2012). Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 23(7), 816–823, doi: 10.1177/0956797611435130.
Chen, H., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Chinese reading and comprehension: A cognitive psychology perspective. In C. Mc Bride-Chang & H. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 157–169). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Holt, J. (1994). Classroom attributes and achievement test scores for deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf, 139(4), 430–437, doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0274.
Li, X. S., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525–552, doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.003.
Liu, Y., & Peng, D. L. (1997). Meaning access of Chinese compounds and its time course. In H. C. Chen (ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 219–232). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Liversedge, S. P., Rayner, K., White, S. J., Vergilino-Perez, D., Findlay, J. M., & Kentridge, R. W. (2004). Eye movements when reading disappearing text: Is there a gap effect in reading? Vision Research, 44(10), 1013−1024, doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.002.
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1409–1419, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000072.
Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383, doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730.
Shen, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2018). The processing of Chinese compound words with ambiguous morphemes in sentence context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 131–139, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1270975.
Von Der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003.
Yan, G. L., Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259–268, doi: 10.1348/000712605X70066

[1]	仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, 齐琦. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.
[2]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[3]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[4]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[5]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[6]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[7]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[8]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[9]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[10]	张笛, 赵微, 李莉, 高桂丽. 早期词意识测量及其对阅读的预测作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 771-778.
[11]	杨雪, 雷江华. 阅读能力对听障大学生语音编码的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[12]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[13]	范奕敏, 张湘琳, 曹玉卿, 李虹. 小学生阅读障碍行为筛查家长问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 521-527.
[14]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[15]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.