项目竞争强度对网络成瘾大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.01.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 执行功能缺陷是网络成瘾发生、维持和复发的原因之一，以往研究侧重于探讨网络成瘾者注意控制、反应抑制等执行功能成分的损伤状况，而其记忆抑制状况尚不清楚。本研究通过考察网络成瘾大学生的提取诱发遗忘（RIF）来探讨其记忆抑制的特点及RIF的产生机制。结果发现：低网络成瘾个体在高项目竞争强度下表现出显著的RIF，在低项目竞争强度下未产生；高网络成瘾个体在低项目竞争强度下表现出显著的RIF，在高项目竞争强度下未产生。结果表明网络成瘾大学生的记忆抑制能力受损严重，其在低项目竞争强度下易受相关代价与效益问题（CCB）影响而产生干扰性RIF。

关键词: 网络成瘾, 提取诱发遗忘, 项目竞争强度, 相关代价与效益问题, 记忆抑制

Abstract: Executive function deficits are one of the causes of the onset, maintenance, and recurrence of internet addiction. Previous studies focused on the impairment of executive function components such as attentional control and response inhibition in internet addicts; however, the status of memory suppression in internet addicts is unclear. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of memory suppression and the mechanism of the retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) by testing the RIF of college students with internet addiction. The results showed that individuals with low internet addiction yielded a significant RIF in the condition of high-item competition intensity rather than the low-item competition intensity condition. In contrast, individuals with high internet addiction yielded a significant RIF in the condition of low-item competition intensity, but not under the high-item competition intensity condition. These results indicate that the memory suppression ability of college students with internet addiction is seriously impaired; and the RIF is affected by the correlated costs and benefits problem (CCB), which causes interference-based RIF under low-item competition intensity condition.

Key words: internet addiction, retrieval-induced forgetting, item competition intensity, the correlated costs and benefits problem, memory suppression

中图分类号:

B842

刘旭, 蔡佳, 崔喆, 宋美含, 王力. 项目竞争强度对网络成瘾大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 8-14.

LIU Xu, CAI Jia, CUI Zhe, SONG Meihan, WANG Li. Effects of Item Competitive Intensity on Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in College Students with Internet Addiction[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(1): 8-14.

参考文献

白学军, 刘旭. (2013). 项目竞争强度对老年人提取诱发遗忘的影响. 中国老年学杂志, 33(11), 2481–2484, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2013.11.001
陈若婷, 刘萌萌, 李志明, 刘苏姣, 严万森. (2020). 吸烟成瘾者与网络成瘾者的特质冲动及认知抑制的事件相关电位分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 34(6), 543–548, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.6.012
李苑文. (2013). 网络、手机成瘾青少年的同伴依恋与孤独感的特点及其关系研究(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
刘玎, 卢宁. (2017). 成就动机与大学生网络成瘾的关系: 不成熟防御方式和职业决策困难的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(6), 1093–1097, doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.06.021
刘旭, 旷生权, 舒泽逸, 白学军. (2017). 项目竞争强度对毒品成瘾者提取诱发遗忘的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(6), 1069–1073, doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2017.06.016
刘旭, 李百涵, 吴瑶, 周含芳, 张倩. (2019). 项目竞争强度对焦虑特质大学生提取诱发遗忘的影响. 中国心理卫生杂志, 33(11), 856–861, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.11.011
刘旭, 岳鹏飞, 白学军. (2019). 提取诱发遗忘中的相关代价与效益问题: 反应抑制能力与项目竞争强度的影响. 心理科学, 42(5), 1039–1046, doi: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20190503
刘奕蔓, 李丽, 马瑜, 梁忠环, 孙在福, 崔久岗, .. 付强强. (2021). 中国大学生网络成瘾发生率的Meta分析. 中国循证医学杂志, 21(1), 61–68, doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202004188
缪素媚, 黄赛, 张豹. (2018). 网络游戏对抗分心物干扰能力的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 432–435, 426, doi: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.03.003.
张晶, 张玉姣, 申鲁军. (2019). 不同程度手机网络过度使用者不同时程条件下注意偏向的特点. 中国心理卫生杂志, 33(7), 545–549, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.07.015
张志莹, 洪丝语, 李娜, 史瑞苓, 王昊, 王立宇, 许昭. (2018, 11月). 游戏成瘾者抑制功能损害的ERP研究. 第二十一届全国心理学学术会议, 北京.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 415–445, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1063–1087, doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063.
Anderson, M. C., & Levy, B. J. (2007). Theoretical issues in inhibition: Insights from research on human memory. In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), Inhibition in cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 81–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, doi: 10.1037/11587-005.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780203771587.
Dong, G. H., Shen, Y., Huang, J., & Du, X. X. (2013). Impaired error-monitoring function in people with internet addiction disorder: An event-related fMRI study. European Addiction Research, 19(5), 269–275, doi: 10.1159/000346783.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191, doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
Ko, C. H., Hsieh, T. J., Chen, C. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Yen, J. Y., .. Liu, G. C. (2014). Altered brain activation during response inhibition and error processing in subjects with Internet gaming disorder: A functional magnetic imaging study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 264(8), 661–672, doi: 10.1007/s00406-013-0483-3.
Ortega, A., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., Román, P., & Bajo, M. T. (2012). Memory inhibition, aging, and the executive deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 178–186, doi: 10.1037/a0024510.
Penolazzi, B., Del Missier, F., Stramaccia, D. F., Monego, A. L., Castelli, L., Manzan, A., … Galfano, G. (2020). Testing the transdiagnostic hypothesis of inhibitory control deficits in addictions: An experimental study on gambling disorder. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 9(2), 339–346, doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00021.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 98–122, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.002.
Schilling, C. J., Storm, B. C., & Anderson, M. C. (2014). Examining the costs and benefits of inhibition in memory retrieval. Cognition, 133(2), 358–370, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.003.
Schlichting, A., Aslan, A., Holterman, C., & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2015). Working memory capacity predicts the beneficial effect of selective memory retrieval. Memory, 23(5), 786–794, doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.927506.
Soriano, M. F., Jiménez, J. F., Román, P., & Bajo, M. T. (2009). Inhibitory processes in memory are impaired in schizophrenia: Evidence from retrieval induced forgetting. British Journal of Psychology, 100(4), 661–673, doi: 10.1348/000712609X418912.
Storm, B. C., & White, H. A. (2010). ADHD and retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a deficit in the inhibitory control of memory. Memory, 18(3), 265–271, doi: 10.1080/09658210903547884.
Stramaccia, D. F., Penolazzi, B., Monego, A. L., Manzan, A., Castelli, L., & Galfano, G. (2017). Suppression of competing memories in substance-related and addictive disorders: A retrieval-induced forgetting study. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(2), 410–417, doi: 10.1177/2167702616671780.
Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

[1]	张一林, 周姿言, 刘雨佳, 辛素飞. 无聊倾向对青少年网络成瘾的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 419-425.
[2]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[3]	刘湍丽, 郝兴风, 邢敏, 白学军. 网络成瘾对大学生推理能力的影响：工作记忆容量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 642-649.
[4]	丁倩, 张永欣, 魏华, 胡伟. 中庸思维与大学生网络成瘾：社会支持和孤独感的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 553-560.
[5]	马小凤, 王斌强, 周爱保. 提取练习的发展特点：8-9岁儿童与成人的比较[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 484-489,533.
[6]	侯娟, 侯莹莹, 陈双艺, 方晓义. 网络成瘾者工作记忆能力的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 384-393.
[7]	魏华, 周宗奎, 张永欣, 丁倩. 压力与网络成瘾的关系：家庭支持和朋友支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 266-271.
[8]	陈维, 赵守盈. 大学生网络成瘾量表（修订版）的多元概化分析^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 95-99.
[9]	金盛华, 吴嵩. 家长网络监管的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 490-494.
[10]	dr.leili@china.com. 提取练习在定向遗忘中的作用[J]. , 2009, 7(2): 87-92.