父母教养方式类型与青少年网络成瘾的关系：认知情绪调节策略的中介作用

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2023.06.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨父亲和母亲教养方式的潜在类型与青少年网络成瘾的关系并检验认知情绪调节策略在其中的作用，采用父母教养方式问卷、认知情绪调节策略问卷和网络成瘾问卷对重庆市4091名中学生进行调查。结果表明：(1)父亲和母亲均存在三种潜在教养类型，即积极型、混合型和消极型；(2)与父母混合型教养类型相比，父母积极型教养类型显著负向预测网络成瘾；(3)以父母混合型教养类型作为参照组，适应性和非适应性认知情绪调节策略在父母积极型教养类型与网络成瘾之间存在中介作用，非适应性认知情绪调节策略在父母消极型教养类型与网络成瘾之间存在中介作用。

关键词: 父母教养方式, 认知情绪调节策略, 网络成瘾, 潜在剖面分析, 青少年

Abstract: To examine the latent profiles of paternal and maternal parenting style and their association with internet addiction as well as the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies between them, this study surveyed 4091 middle school students in Chongqing, China. All the participants completed the related questionnaires, including the Parenting Style Questionnaire, the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Strategy Questionnaire, and the Internet Addiction Questionnaire. The results showed that: 1) There were three profiles of paternal parenting style as well as maternal parenting style, including positive, mixed, and negative profiles respectively. 2) Compared with the mixed parenting style, the positive parenting style significantly and negatively predicted internet addiction. 3) Adaptive and maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies played as a mediator between positive parenting style and internet addiction when the mixed parenting style was regarded as a reference group. Maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediated the relationship between negative parenting style and internet addiction when the mixed parenting style was regarded as a reference group.

Key words: parenting style, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, internet addiction, latent profile analysis, adolescents

中图分类号:

B844

占萍萍, 古静静, 王金良. 父母教养方式类型与青少年网络成瘾的关系：认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 776-783.

Pingping ZHAN, Jingjing GU, Jinliang WANG. The Relationship Between Parenting Types and Adolescent Internet Addiction: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 776-783.

图/表 7

参考文献

	董光恒, 朱艳新, 杨丽珠. 认知情绪调节问卷中文版的应用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2008, (4): 456- 458. DOI
	高文斌, 陈祉妍. 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14 (4): 596- 603. DOI
	蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26 (1): 94- 99. DOI
	吴鹏, 马桑妮, 方紫琼, 徐碧波, 刘华山. 父母教养方式的潜在类别: 潜在剖面分析. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14 (4): 523- 530. DOI
	中国健康教育中心. 中国青少年健康教育核心信息及释义(2018版). 健康向导, 2018, 24 (6): 42- 46. DOI
	周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950. DOI
	Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., ... van der Ende, J.. The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999, 27 (4): 613- 628. DOI
	Contreras, J. M., Kerns, K. A., Weimer, B. L., Gentzler, A. L., & Tomich, P. L.. Emotion regulation as a mediator of associations between mother-child attachment and peer relationships in middle childhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 2000, 14 (1): 111- 124. DOI
	Darling, N., & Steinberg, L.. Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113 (3): 487- 496. DOI
	Davis, R. A.. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17 (2): 187- 195. DOI
	Derevensky, J. L., Hayman, V., & Gilbeau, L.. Behavioral addictions: Excessive gambling, gaming, internet, and smartphone use among children and adolescents. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 2019, 66 (6): 1163- 1182. DOI
	Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V.. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire−development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 2006, 41 (6): 1045- 1053. DOI
	Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V.. The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2007, 23 (3): 141- 149. DOI
	Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P.. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 30 (8): 1311- 1327. DOI
	Gross, J. J.. Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 2002, 39 (3): 281- 291. DOI
	Guo, Y. Y., Gu, J. J., Gaskin, J., Yin, X. Q., Zhang, Y. H., & Wang, J. L.. The association of childhood maltreatment with internet addiction: The serial mediating effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depression. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2023, 140, 106134.
	Hipp, J. R., & Bauer, D. J.. Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 2006, 11 (1): 36- 53. DOI
	Houltberg, B. J., Morris, A. S., Cui, L. X., Henry, C. S., & Criss, M. M.. The role of youth anger in explaining links between parenting and early adolescent prosocial and antisocial behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 2016, 36 (3): 297- 318. DOI
	Jia, J. C., Li, D. P., Li, X., Zhou, Y. Y., Wang, Y. H., Sun, W. Q., & Zhao, L. Y.. Peer victimization and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological security and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018, 85, 116- 124. DOI
	Kokka, I., Mourikis, I., Nicolaides, N. C., Darviri, C., Chrousos, G. P., Kanaka-Gantenbein, C., & Bacopoulou, F.. Exploring the effects of problematic internet use on adolescent sleep: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18 (2): 760. DOI
	Kökönyei, G., Kocsel, N., Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., Galambos, A., Magi, A., ... Demetrovics, Z.. The role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in problem gaming among adolescents: A nationally representative survey study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2019, 10, 273. DOI
	Larzelere, R. E., Morris, A. S., & Harrist, A. W. (2013). Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
	Li, D. P., Zhang, W. H., Li, X., Zhou, Y. Y., Zhao, L. Y., & Wang, Y. H.. Stressful life events and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 63, 408- 415. DOI
	Li, J. B., Willems, Y. E., Stok, F. M., Deković, M., Bartels, M., & Finkenauer, C.. Parenting and self-control across early to late adolescence: A three-level meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2019, 14 (6): 967- 1005. DOI
	Lo, C. K., Ho, F. K., Emery, C., Chan, K. L., Wong, R. S., Tung, K. T. S., & Ip, P.. Association of harsh parenting and maltreatment with internet addiction, and the mediating role of bullying and social support. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2021, 113, 104928.
	Lukavská, K., Hrabec, O., Lukavský, J., Demetrovics, Z., & Király, O.. The associations of adolescent problematic internet use with parenting: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 2022, 135, 107423. DOI
	Miao, X., Jiang, X., Wang, P. F., Li, H. R., Wang, M. C., & Zeng, H.. Online activities, prevalence of internet addiction and risk factors related to family and school among adolescents in China. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 2018, 7, 14- 18. DOI
	Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R.. The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 2007, 16 (2): 361- 388. DOI
	Mun, E. Y., Windle, M., & Schainker, L. M.. A model-based cluster analysis approach to adolescent problem behaviors and young adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 2008, 20 (1): 291- 318. DOI
	Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O.. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007, 14 (4): 535- 569. DOI
	Preston, K. S. J., Pizano, N. K., Garner, K. M., Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Guerin, D. W., ... Oliver, P. H.. Identifying family personality profiles using latent profile analysis: Relations to happiness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 189, 111480. DOI
	Ren, W., & Zhu, X. W.. Parental mediation and adolescents’ internet use: The moderating role of parenting style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2022, 51 (8): 1483- 1496. DOI
	Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Moral-Zafra, E., Llor-Esteban, B., & Jiménez-Barbero, J. A.. Influence of parental styles and other psychosocial variables on the development of externalizing behaviors in adolescents: A systematic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2019, 11 (1): 9- 21.
	Sebre, S. B., Pakalniškiene, V., Jusiene, R., Wu, J. C. L., Miltuze, A., Martinsone, B., & Lazdina, E. (2023). Children’s problematic use of the internet in biological and social context: A one-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Advance online publication. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10826-022-02527-3
	Shipman, K. L., & Zeman, J.. Socialization of children’s emotion regulation in mother-child dyads: A developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 2001, 13 (2): 317- 336. DOI
	Teuber, Z., Tang, X., Sielemann, L., Otterpohl, N., & Wild, E.. Autonomy-related parenting profiles and their effects on adolescents’ academic and psychological development: A longitudinal person-oriented analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2022, 51 (7): 1333- 1353. DOI
	van Lissa, C. J., Keizer, R., van Lier, P. A. C., Meeus, W. H. J., & Branje, S.. The role of fathers’ versus mothers’ parenting in emotion-regulation development from mid-late adolescence: Disentangling between-family differences from within-family effects. Developmental Psychology, 2019, 55 (2): 377- 389. DOI
	Wu, Y. Q., Liu, F., Chan, K. Q., Wang, N. X., Zhao, S., Sun, X., ... Wang, Z. J.. Childhood psychological maltreatment and internet gaming addiction in Chinese adolescents: Mediation roles of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies and psychosocial problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2022, 129, 105669.
	Yildiz, M. A.. Emotion regulation strategies as predictors of internet addiction and smartphone addiction in adolescents. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 2017, 7 (1): 66- 78.
	Young, K. S.. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1998, 1 (3): 237- 244.
	Zhang, W. X., Wei, X., Ji, L. Q., Chen, L., & Deater-Deckard, K.. Reconsidering parenting in Chinese culture: Subtypes, stability, and change of maternal parenting style during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2017, 46 (5): 1117- 1136. DOI
	Zhu, J. J., & Chen, Y. Y.. Developmental pathways from parental rejection to adolescent internet gaming disorder: A parallel process latent growth model. Children and Youth Services Review, 2021, 128, 106128. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1.父亲拒绝	1.46	0.52
2.母亲拒绝	1.49	0.54	0.67***
3.父亲温暖	2.75	0.75	−0.39***	−0.33***
4.母亲温暖	2.89	0.71	−0.26***	−0.39***	0.82***
5.父亲过度保护	2.04	0.52	0.53***	0.41***	−0.04**	−0.05**
6.母亲过度保护	2.19	0.55	0.42***	0.57***	−0.08***	−0.08***	0.77***
7.适应性认知情绪调节策略	4.17	0.85	−0.05***	−0.06***	0.28***	0.31***	0.06***	0.06***
8.非适应性认知情绪调节策略	2.28	0.51	0.24**	0.28***	−0.12***	−0.11***	0.24***	0.27***	0.23***
9.网络成瘾	2.54	0.92	0.21***	0.24***	−0.22***	−0.19***	0.16***	0.20***	−0.03*	0.38***

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
1.父亲拒绝	1.46	0.52
2.母亲拒绝	1.49	0.54	0.67***
3.父亲温暖	2.75	0.75	−0.39***	−0.33***
4.母亲温暖	2.89	0.71	−0.26***	−0.39***	0.82***
5.父亲过度保护	2.04	0.52	0.53***	0.41***	−0.04**	−0.05**
6.母亲过度保护	2.19	0.55	0.42***	0.57***	−0.08***	−0.08***	0.77***
7.适应性认知情绪调节策略	4.17	0.85	−0.05***	−0.06***	0.28***	0.31***	0.06***	0.06***
8.非适应性认知情绪调节策略	2.28	0.51	0.24**	0.28***	−0.12***	−0.11***	0.24***	0.27***	0.23***
9.网络成瘾	2.54	0.92	0.21***	0.24***	−0.22***	−0.19***	0.16***	0.20***	−0.03*	0.38***

类别数目	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	BLRT(p)	LMR(p)	类别概率
父亲
1	21725.72	21763.62	21744.55
2	19500.98	19564.14	19532.37	0.91	<0.001	<0.001	0.896/0.104
3	18324.16	18412.59	18368.10	0.88	<0.001	<0.001	0.717/0.242/0.041
4	17806.08	17919.78	17862.59	0.89	<0.01	<0.01	0.659/0.263/0.059/0.019
5	17461.04	17600.00	17530.10	0.88	<0.05	<0.05	0.582/0.248/0.114/0.042/0.014
母亲
1	22049.81	22087.71	22068.65
2	19678.77	19741.93	19710.16	0.89	<0.001	<0.001	0.865/0.135
3	18582.71	18671.14	18626.65	0.87	<0.001	<0.001	0.693/0.255/0.052
4	18040.74	18154.44	18097.24	0.89	<0.001	<0.001	0.642/0.270/0.071/0.017
5	17682.52	17821.48	17751.57	0.87	<0.001	<0.001	0.545/0.245/0.143/0.051/0.016

类别数目	AIC	BIC	aBIC	Entropy	BLRT(p)	LMR(p)	类别概率
父亲
1	21725.72	21763.62	21744.55
2	19500.98	19564.14	19532.37	0.91	<0.001	<0.001	0.896/0.104
3	18324.16	18412.59	18368.10	0.88	<0.001	<0.001	0.717/0.242/0.041
4	17806.08	17919.78	17862.59	0.89	<0.01	<0.01	0.659/0.263/0.059/0.019
5	17461.04	17600.00	17530.10	0.88	<0.05	<0.05	0.582/0.248/0.114/0.042/0.014
母亲
1	22049.81	22087.71	22068.65
2	19678.77	19741.93	19710.16	0.89	<0.001	<0.001	0.865/0.135
3	18582.71	18671.14	18626.65	0.87	<0.001	<0.001	0.693/0.255/0.052
4	18040.74	18154.44	18097.24	0.89	<0.001	<0.001	0.642/0.270/0.071/0.017
5	17682.52	17821.48	17751.57	0.87	<0.001	<0.001	0.545/0.245/0.143/0.051/0.016

路径	标准化效应值	95%置信区间
路径	标准化效应值	Lower	Upper
父亲积极型总效应	−0.39	−3.44	−2.39
父亲积极→网络成瘾	−0.20	−0.25	−0.12
父亲积极→适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.02	−0.03	−0.01
父亲积极→非适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.17	−0.20	−0.14
父亲消极型总效应	0.13	−0.23	2.15
父亲消极→网络成瘾	0.06	−0.09	0.19
父亲消极→适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.02	−0.04	0.01
父亲消极→非适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	0.09	0.02	0.17
母亲积极型总效应	−0.50	−0.52	−0.39
母亲积极→网络成瘾	−0.31	−0.35	−0.22
母亲积极→适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.02	−0.03	−0.01
母亲积极→非适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.17	−0.20	−0.14
母亲消极型总效应	0.13	−0.01	0.25
母亲消极→网络成瘾	−0.01	−0.13	0.11
母亲消极→适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	−0.01	−0.03	0.01
母亲消极→非适应性认知情绪调节→网络成瘾	0.15	0.10	0.21