日常生活事件与高中生日常情绪体验的多层分析-神经质的调节作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用日常生活事件问卷、日常情绪体验问卷以及神经质量表，连续14天对234名高中生进行调查，以考察日常生活事件与高中生日常情绪体验的关系以及神经质的调节作用。多层线性模型分析的结果显示：（1）在个体内和个体间两个水平上，日常积极生活事件仅可正向预测日常积极情绪体验，日常消极生活事件可正向预测日常消极情绪体验，负向预测日常积极情绪体验；（2）神经质可加强日常消极生活事件对日常消极情绪体验的正向预测作用，可减弱日常积极生活事件对日常积极情绪体验的正向预测作用。由此得出结论，日常生活事件与高中生日常情绪体验之间的关系在个体内与个体间存在着一致性，神经质在其中起到调节作用。

关键词: 日常生活事件, 日常情绪体验, 神经质, 调节作用, 高中生

Abstract: Scales of daily life events, daily emotion experience and nervousness were used in the sample of 234 senior high school students for continuous 14 days to investigate the relationship between daily life events and senior high school students' daily emotion experience, and the moderation effect of nervousness. The results of hierarchical linear models indicated:1) At the within-person level and the between-person level, daily negative life events could positively predict senior high school students' daily negative emotion experience and negatively predict daily positive emotion experience, but daily positive life events could only positively predict daily positive emotion experience. 2) Nervousness could strengthen the positive association between daily negative life events and daily negative emotion experience. At the same time, it could weaken the positive association between daily positive life events and daily positive emotion experience. The results of the study suggest that the relationships between daily life events and senior high school students' daily emotion experience at the within-person level and the between-person level have consistency. Nervousness can moderate the relationship between daily life events and senior high school students' daily emotion experience.

Key words: daily life events, daily emotion experience, nervousness, moderation, senior high school students

中图分类号:

B842.6

张兴慧, 罗玉晗, 玄新, 王耘. 日常生活事件与高中生日常情绪体验的多层分析-神经质的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 348-353.

ZHANG Xinghui, LUO Yuhan, XUAN Xin, WANG Yun. The Multilevel Analysis of Daily Life Events on Senior High School Students' Daily Emotion Experience: the Moderation Effect of Nervousness[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(3): 348-353.

参考文献

?陈亮, 刘文, 车翰博. (2015). 小学生神经质与抑郁情绪的关系:情绪调节的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (1), 47-54
黄希庭, 杨治良, 林崇德. (2003). 心理学大辞典. 上海:上海教育出版社.
李志勇, 吴明证, 王大鹏. (2014). 积极事件与大学生生活满意度的关系:序列中介效应分析. 中国特殊教育, (12), 92-96
刘慧娟, 张璟. (2002). 高中生不良情绪状态的特点研究. 心理发展与教育, 18(2), 60-63
潘婷婷, 丁雪辰, 桑标, 刘影, 谢诗韵, 冯星熠. (2015). 正负性情感量表儿童版(PANAS-C)的信效度初探. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(3), 397-400
张建新, 张妙清, 梁觉. (2003). 大六人格因素的临床价值——中国人人格测量表(CPAI)、大五人格问卷(NEOPI)与MMPI-2临床量表的关系模式. 中国心理卫生协会第四届学术大会论文汇编, 北京.
张银普, 骆南峰, 石伟. (2016). 经验取样法——一种收集"真实"数据的新方法. 心理科学进展, 24(2), 305-316
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality:A psychological interpretation. New York:Holt.
Berkowitz, L. (2003). Affect, aggression, and antisocial behavior. In Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 804-823). New York:Oxford University Press.
Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 890-902.
Burger, R., Posel, D., & von Fintel, M. (2017). The relationship between negative household events and depressive symptoms:Evidence from South African longitudinal data. Journal of Affective Disorders, 218, 170-175.
Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked:Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361-368.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI):Professional manual. Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365-376.
Larson, R. W., Moneta, G., Richards, M. H., & Wilson, S. (2002). Continuity, stability, and change in daily emotional experience across adolescence. Child Development, 73(4), 1151-1165.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Jr., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., …Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children:Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 326-338.
Miller, D. J., Vachon, D. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2009). Neuroticism, negative affect, and negative affect instability:Establishing convergent and discriminant validity using ecological momentary assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 873-877.
Mroczek, D. K., & Almeida, D. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 355-378.
Ng, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality differences in emotions:Does emotion regulation play a role? Journal of Individual Differences, 30(2), 100-106.
Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2003). Adolescents' emotion regulation in daily life:Links to depressive symptoms and problem behavior. Child Development, 74(6), 1869-1880.
Suls, J. (2001). Affect, stress, and personality. In Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 392-409). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Troy, A. S., Wilhelm, F. H., Shallcross, A. J., & Mauss, I. B. (2010). Seeing the silver lining:Cognitive reappraisal ability moderates the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 10(6), 783-795.
Tugade, M. M., Fredrickson, B. L., & Feldman, B. L. (2004). Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity:Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1161-1190.
Vinkers, C. H., Joëls, M., Milaneschi, Y., Kahn, R. S., Penninx, B. W. J. H., & Boks, M. P. M. (2014). Stress exposure across the life span cumulatively increases depression risk and is moderated by neuroticism. Depression and Anxiety, 31(9), 737-745.
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory:A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Research in organizational behavior:An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews. US:Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
Zautra, A. J., Affleck, G. G., Tennen, H., Reich, J. W., & Davis, M. C. (2005). Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life:Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1511-1538.

[1]	张鹏程, 李喜, 桑宇杰, 陈宁. 神经质人格对中小学生抑郁的影响：班级环境的跨层调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 637-643.
[2]	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. 大学生神经质纵向预测攻击行为的时间路径模型：敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的双向中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 396-402.
[3]	颜志强, 李珊. 共情和抑郁的关系：同伴关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 424-430.
[4]	彭丽仪, 胡义秋, 曾子豪, 詹林. 儿童期受虐经历对大学生抑郁的影响：神经质人格和MAOA基因rs3027407多态性的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 230-236.
[5]	张野, 苑波, 王凯, 申婷. 冲动性特质对高中生自杀意念的影响：校园排斥与生命意义感的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 89-95.
[6]	张振. 自恋与攻击行为的关系：观点采择和共情关注的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 131-136.
[7]	孙崇勇, 刘丽丽, 高春阳. 翻转教学法对高中生认知负荷及学习成绩的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 369-375.
[8]	李昌竹, 郑士春, 陆梭, 张雨青, 刘正奎. 心率变异性与人格的神经质之间关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 275-280.
[9]	刘立立, 缴润凯. 高中生生涯学习经验问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 238-246.
[10]	魏华, 周宗奎, 张永欣, 丁倩. 压力与网络成瘾的关系：家庭支持和朋友支持的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 266-271.
[11]	姜永志, 王海霞, 蒋怀滨, 刘勇. 神经质人格对青少年移动社交网络过度使用的影响：冲动性与人际困扰的双重中介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(2): 272-282.
[12]	钟琼瑶, 韩萍, 胡惠云, 吴国来. 高中生父亲在位与社会适应行为的关系：中介与调节作用分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 786-792.
[13]	梁三才, 吴海梅. 情绪调节自我效能感在神经质、尽责性与心盛之间的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 709-713.
[14]	李瑛, 崔树军. 高中生内隐、外显成就动机与学业拖延的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 359-365.
[15]	曹立人,王婷,朱琳. 高中生学习力的影响因素研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 773-778.