亲子关系和移情对青少年社会创造力的预测：友谊质量的中介作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用儿童社会创造性倾向问卷、亲子亲密度量表、人际反应指针量表和友谊质量问卷，以588名初中生为被试，探讨亲子关系和移情对青少年社会创造力的影响及其作用机制，并检验了友谊质量的中介作用。结果表明：（1）父子关系、母子关系和移情显著正向预测青少年社会创造力；（2）青少年友谊质量在母子关系和移情预测青少年社会创造力中起中介作用。本研究揭示了父子关系、母子关系以及移情对社会创造力的预测作用及其作用机制，研究结果对培养青少年社会创造力具有一定的启发意义。

关键词: 社会创造力, 亲子关系, 移情, 友谊质量, 青少年

Abstract: The current study explored the influences of parent-child relationship and empathy on social creativity and the mediating role of friendship quality on such effects. A series of questionnaires, including the Social Creative Tendency Questionnaire for Children, Closeness to Parents Scale, Interpersonal Reactivity Index-C (IRI-C), and Friendship Quality Questionnaire (FQQ), were used to survey 588 middle school students. The results was showed as follows: 1) mother-child relationship, father-child relationship, and empathy directly predicted social creativity of adolescents; 2) friendship quality mediated the prediction of social creativity by mother-child relationship and empathy. The present study reveals various mechanisms on how parent-child relationship and empathy impact the social creativity of the adolescents, which would provide parents and educators with valuable insights on promoting the creativity of adolescents.

Key words: social creativity, parent-child relationship, empathy, friendship quality, adolescents

中图分类号:

B844

李昂, 张景焕. 亲子关系和移情对青少年社会创造力的预测：友谊质量的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 496-502.

LI Ang, ZHANG Jinghuan. The Prediction of Parent-Child Relationship and Empathy on Adolescents’ Social Creativity: The Mediating Role of Friendship Quality[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 496-502.

参考文献

陈秀珠, 赖伟平, 麻海芳, 陈俊, 单彦彤. (2017). 亲子关系与青少年心理资本的关系: 友谊质量的中介效应与学校联结的调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 544-553
谷传华, 范翠英, 张冬静, 杨森, 宋娟娟. (2012). 父母养育方式、人格对儿童社会创造性和社会喜好的影响. 中国特殊教育, (11), 78-83, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2012.11.014
谷传华, 张海霞, 周宗奎. (2009). 小学儿童的社会创造性倾向与教师领导方式的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(3), 284-286
谷传华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 郝恩河, 王亚丽. (2013). 状态与特质之分: 来自社会创造性的证据. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 483-490
谷传华, 周宗奎. (2008). 小学儿童社会创造性倾向与父母养育方式的关系. 心理发展与教育, 24(2), 34-38
谷传华, 周宗奎, 种明慧. (2009). 小学儿童社会创造性与其同伴关系、学业成绩的关系. 心理发展与教育, 25(3), 20-25
刘海娇, 田录梅, 王姝琼, 张文新. (2011). 青少年的父子关系、母子关系及其对抑郁的影响. 心理科学, 34(6), 1403-1408
侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. (2018). 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响: 亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(4), 417-425
宋静静, 谷传华, 张永欣, 张菲菲, 郝恩河. (2013). 留守青少年互联网使用对社会创造性的影响: 社会关系网络的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (1), 63-69
田菲菲, 田录梅. (2014). 亲子关系、朋友关系影响问题行为的3种模型. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 968-976
田录梅, 张文新, 陈光辉. (2014). 父母支持、友谊质量对孤独感和抑郁的影响: 检验一个间接效应模型. 心理学报, 46(2), 238-251
吴旻, 刘争光, 梁丽婵. (2016). 亲子关系对儿童青少年心理发展的影响. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 55-63
张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳. (2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155-157
张锦涛, 刘勤学, 邓林园, 方晓义, 刘朝莹, 兰菁. (2011). 青少年亲子关系与网络成瘾: 孤独感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 641-647
张景焕, 刘欣, 任菲菲, 孙祥薇, 于颀. (2016). 团队多样性与组织支持对团队创造力的影响. 心理学报, 48(12), 1551-1560
张景焕, 满达呼, 刘桂荣, 张舜, 窦菲菲, 林崇德. (2013). 父母教养方式对小学高年级学生社会创造力的影响: 自尊的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(6), 595-603
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950
周宗奎, 孙晓军, 赵冬梅, Yeh, H. (2005). 童年中期同伴关系与孤独感的中介变量检验. 心理学报, 37(6), 776-783
Barr, J. J., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2007). Adolescent empathy and prosocial behavior in the multidimensional context of school culture. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 231-250, doi: 10.3200/GNTP.168.3.231-250.
Blair, B. L., Perry, N. B., O’Brien, M., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P., & Shanahan, L. (2014). The indirect effects of maternal emotion socialization on friendship quality in middle childhood. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 566-576.
Boele, S., van der Graaff, J., de Wied, M., van der Valk, I. E., Crocetti, E., & Branje, S. (2019). Linking parent-child and peer relationship quality to empathy in adolescence: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(6), 1033-1055, doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00993-5.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Buchanan, C. M., Maccoby, E. E., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Caught between parents: Adolescents’ experience in divorced homes. Child Development, 62(5), 1008-1029, doi: 10.2307/1131149.
Chow, C. M., Ruhl, H., & Buhrmester, D. (2013). The mediating role of interpersonal competence between adolescents’ empathy and friendship quality: A dyadic approach. Journal of Adolescence, 36(1), 191-200, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.004.
Cohn, D. A., Patterson, C. J., & Christopoulos, C. (1991). The family and children’s peer relations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(3), 315-346, doi: 10.1177/0265407591083002.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.
Dostál, D., Plháková, A., & Záškodná, T. (2017). Domain-specific creativity in relation to the level of empathy and systemizing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 225-239, doi: 10.1002/jocb.103.
Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. P. (1991). Empathy-related responding and cognition: A “chicken and the egg” dilemma. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 63-88). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Form, S., & Kaernbach, C. (2018). More is not always better: The differentiated influence of empathy on different magnitudes of creativity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 54-65, doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1432.
Glick, G. C., & Rose, A. J. (2011). Prospective associations between friendship adjustment and social strategies: Friendship as a context for building social skills. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1117-1132, doi: 10.1037/a0023277.
Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 355-370, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.355.
Kretschmer, T., Sentse, M., Meeus, W., Verhulst, F. C., Veenstra, R., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2016). Configurations of adolescents’ peer experiences: Associations with parent-child relationship quality and parental problem behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26(3), 474-491, doi: 10.1111/jora.12206.
Liu, Y. L. (2006). Paternal/maternal attachment, peer support, social expectations of peer interaction, and depressive symptoms. Adolescence, 41(164), 705-721.
Mesurado, B., & Richaud, M. C. (2017). The relationship between parental variables, empathy and prosocial-flow with prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 843-860, doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9748-7.
Meuwese, R., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Güroğlu, B. (2017). Friends in high places: A dyadic perspective on peer status as predictor of friendship quality and the mediating role of empathy and prosocial behavior. Social Development, 26(3), 503-519, doi: 10.1111/sode.12213.
Mouchiroud, C., & Bernoussi, A. (2008). An empirical study of the construct validity of social creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 372-380, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.008.
Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2002). Social creativity: A cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-old children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(1), 60-69, doi: 10.1177/016502540202600111.
Sallquist, J., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Eggum, N. D., & Gaertner, B. M. (2009). Assessment of preschoolers’ positive empathy: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with positive emotion, social competence, and sympathy. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 223-233, doi: 10.1080/17439760902819444.
Smith, R. L., & Rose, A. J. (2011). The “cost of caring” in youths’ friendships: Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1792-1803, doi: 10.1037/a0025309.
Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sekiguchi, A., Nouchi, R., Kotozaki, Y., Nakagawa, S., … Kawashima, R. (2014). Creativity measured by divergent thinking is associated with two axes of autistic characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 921.
Xu, L. Y., Liu, L. S., Li, Y. F., Liu, L. J., & Huntsinger, C. S. (2018). Parent-child relationships and Chinese children’s social adaptations: Gender difference in parent-child dyads. Personal Relationships, 25(4), 462-479, doi: 10.1111/pere.12254.
Yeh, Y. C. (2004). The interactive influences of three ecological systems on R & D Employees’ technological creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 11-25, doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1601_2.
Zhang, D. J., Zhou, Z. K., Gu, C. H., Lei, Y. J., & Fan, C. Y. (2018). Family socio-economic status and parent-child relationships are associated with the social creativity of elementary school children: The mediating role of personality traits. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(9), 2999-3007, doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1130-4.

[1]	石鑫欣, 吴怡霏, 冯迎. 父母差别对待与青少年问题行为的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 644-650.
[2]	罗芮, 赵云燕, 何然, 王耘, 陈福美. 二孩家庭父母偏爱的特点及其与青少年抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 657-664.
[3]	王刚, 刘赛凤, 李琦琛, 文岱, 伍韫旖, 蒋波西, 李放. 父母忽视与青少年短视频过度使用的关系：正念和自我控制的中介机制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 487-493.
[4]	李晓明, 刘小丹, 戴婷. 特质焦虑与青少年冒险行为的关系：基于双系统模型的机制探讨[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 529-535.
[5]	李永占. 情绪智力在身体自尊与进食障碍倾向间的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 570-576.
[6]	孙洪蕊, 柳铭心, 张兴利, 周晨浩, 刁雅欣, 包乃丽. 父亲和母亲自主支持的特点及其与青少年社会适应的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 375-381.
[7]	张一林, 周姿言, 刘雨佳, 辛素飞. 无聊倾向对青少年网络成瘾的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 419-425.
[8]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[9]	孙锦露, 刘海骅. 青少年校园欺凌行为量表编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 255-260.
[10]	袁博, 廖苏霞, 郭俏俏, 高奇扬, 陈思宇. 流动儿童的社会善念水平及其提升[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 268-273.
[11]	邓慧颖, 孔繁昌. 粗暴养育和青少年生命意义寻求的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 612-619.
[12]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[13]	孔繁昌, 王美茹, 孙乙元, 夏宇娟, 李晓瑶. 父母手机冷落行为与青少年疏离感的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 486-492.
[14]	刘艾祎, 伍新春. 创伤后应激障碍对震后青少年反社会行为的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 244-251.
[15]	刘啸莳. 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系：母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 59-65.