累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在探讨累积生态风险与农村初中生攻击行为之间的关系，以及道德推脱的中介作用与共情的调节作用。通过对845名农村初中生进行问卷调查，结果发现：（1）农村初中生累积生态风险、道德推脱与攻击行为两两之间均存在显著正相关；（2）道德推脱在累积生态风险与农村初中生攻击行为之间起部分中介作用；（3）共情调节道德推脱在累积生态风险与攻击行为之间的中介效应，相对于共情水平较高的农村初中生，中介效应在共情水平较低的农村初中生中更显著。

关键词: 累积生态风险, 道德推脱, 共情, 攻击行为, 农村初中生

Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between cumulative ecological risk and aggressive behaviors among rural junior school students, and the mediating role of moral disengagement and the moderating role of empathy therein. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 845 rural junior school students. The results revealed that: 1) cumulative ecological risk, moral disengagement and aggressive behaviors were positively correlated with each other; 2) moral disengagement partially mediated the relationship between cumulative ecological risk and aggressive behaviors; 3) empathy moderated the mediation effect of moral disengagement between cumulative ecological risk and aggressive behaviors. The mediating effect was found to be more significant among rural junior school students with low level of empathy than among those with high level of empathy.

Key words: cumulative ecological risk, moral disengagement, empathy, aggressive behaviors, rural junior school students

中图分类号:

B844.1

谭千保, 李佳圆, 刘旭. 累积生态风险对农村初中生攻击行为的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.

TAN Qianbao, LI Jiayuan, LIU Xu. The Effect of Cumulative Ecological Risk on Aggressive Behaviors for Rural Junior School Students: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(4): 489-495.

参考文献

鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. (2014). 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力: 子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 30(5), 482-495
池丽萍, 辛自强. (2003). 儿童对婚姻冲突的感知量表修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(8), 554-556, doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2003.08.013
符婷婷, 李鹏, 叶婷. (2020). 共情和网络欺凌: 一个链式中介模型. 心理技术与应用, 8(2), 104-113
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99
李海垒, 张文新, 张金宝. (2008). 青少年心理韧性量表(HKRA)的修订. 心理与行为研究, 6(2), 98-102, 111, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2008.02.004
刘俊升, 周颖, 顾文瑜. (2009). Buss-Perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 17(4), 449-451
欧阳丹. (2005). 教师期望、学业自我概念、学生感知教师支持行为与学业成绩之间的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 广西师范大学, 桂林.
谭千保, 伍牧月, 常志彬. (2018). 累积生态风险影响农村儿童校园欺凌的实证调查. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 17(5), 51-57
王学男, 吴霓. (2019). “后撤并时代”寄宿制学校对农村留守儿童关爱与教育的挑战与可能——基于江西、四川两省的调研. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 18(1), 53-60
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2012). 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 44(8), 1075-1085
张凤凤, 董毅, 汪凯, 詹志禹, 谢伦芳. (2010). 中文版人际反应指针量表(IRI-C)的信度及效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 155-157
张迎黎, 张亚林, 张迎新, 王杰利, 黄存云. (2011). 修订版青少年依恋问卷中文版在初中生中应用的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25(1), 66-70, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2011.01.015
Andershed, A. K., Gibson, C. L., & Andershed, H. (2016). The role of cumulative risk and protection for violent offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 78-84, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.006.
Appleyard, K., Egeland, B., van Dulmen, M. H. M., & Sroufe, L. A. (2005). When more is not better: The role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(3), 235-245, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00351.x.
Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119.
Bjärehed, M., Thornberg, R., Wänström, R., & Gini, L. (2020). Mechanisms of moral disengagement and their associations with indirect bullying, direct bullying, and pro-aggressive bystander behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(1), 1-28.
Bussey, K., Quinn, C., & Dobson, J. (2015). The moderating role of empathic concern and perspective taking on the relationship between moral disengagement and aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 61(1), 10-29, doi: 10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.61.1.0010.
Cho, H., Lee, S. K., Choi, J. S., Choi, S. W., & Kim, D. J. (2017). An exploratory study on association between Internet game contents and aggression in Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 257-262, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.077.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74.
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54-58, doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x.
Dewall, C. N., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 245-258, doi: 10.1037/a0023842.
Fang, J., Wang, X. C., Yuan, K. H., & Wen, Z. L. (2020). Childhood psychological maltreatment and moral disengagement: A moderated mediation model of callous-unemotional traits and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109814, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109814.
Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197-209, doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5.
Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2018). Bullying, moral disengagement and empathy: Exploring the links among early adolescents. Educational Psychology, 38(4), 535-552, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2017.1363376.
Ouvrein, G., De Backer, C. J. S., & Vandebosch, H. (2018). Online celebrity aggression: A combination of low empathy and high moral disengagement? The relationship between empathy and moral disengagement and adolescents’ online celebrity aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 61-69, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.029.
Roberts, W., Strayer, J., & Denham, S. (2014). Empathy, anger, guilt: Emotions and prosocial behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 46(4), 465-474, doi: 10.1037/a0035057.
Savolainen, J., Eisman, A., Mason, W. A., Schwartz, J. A., Miettunen, J., & Jarvelin, M. R. (2018). Socioeconomic disadvantage and psychological deficits: Pathways from early cumulative risk to late-adolescent criminal conviction. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 16-24, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.010.
Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52-67.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). School violence and bullying: Global status and trends, drivers and consequences. Paris: France. Government Printing Office.
Wang, X. C., Zhao, F. Q., Yang, J. P., Gao, L., Li, B., Li, L., & Wang, P. C. (2020). Childhood maltreatment and bullying perpetration among Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and trait anger. Child Abuse & Neglect, 106, 104507.
Wright, M. O., & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development: Fostering positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 17-37). Boston: Springer.
Yang, J. P., Wang, X. C., & Li, L. (2020). Perceived school climate and adolescents’ bullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and peers’ defending. Children and Youth Services Review, 109, 104716, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104716.
Zoll, C., & Enz, S. (2005). A questionnaire to assess affective and cognitive empathy in children. Journal of Child Psychology, 15, 165-174.
Zych, I., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Affective empathy and moral disengagement related to late adolescent bullying perpetration. Ethics & Behavior, 29(7), 547-556.

[1]	钟伟芳, 郭永兴. 悲伤表情识别能力影响疼痛共情—一项ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 585-592.
[2]	王跃鹏, 孟维杰. 班级欺凌规范对初中生旁观者行为的影响：道德推脱的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 522-528.
[3]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[4]	丁倩, 罗星雨. 歧视知觉对留守青少年攻击行为的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 346-352.
[5]	李晓玫, 姜英杰, 于明阳, 袁媛, 刘芳芳. 留守儿童心理虐待与攻击行为：心理弹性和人际敏感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 353-360.
[6]	罗利, 杨东, 陈圣栋, 高伟, 陈永强, 袁加锦. 特质敬畏对亲社会倾向的正向预测：自我超越和共情的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 390-396.
[7]	郭英, 陈灿杰, 胡东, 袁安怡. 道德认同对大学生亲社会行为倾向的影响：共情的中介作用和正念的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 80-87.
[8]	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. 大学生神经质纵向预测攻击行为的时间路径模型：敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的双向中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 396-402.
[9]	颜志强, 李珊. 共情和抑郁的关系：同伴关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 424-430.
[10]	高玲, 花苏晴, 李沛沛, 杨继平, 王兴超. 同胞关系与青少年亲社会行为：道德推脱的中介作用和共情的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 216-222.
[11]	张振. 自恋与攻击行为的关系：观点采择和共情关注的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 131-136.
[12]	王星星, 钟瑶, 张媛. 自我损耗对攻击行为的影响：复愈性环境的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 137-144.
[13]	宋娟, 杜梦, 连涛, 张倩. 积极怀旧情绪对疼痛共情影响的ERP研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 466-473.
[14]	麻书滔, 陈少华, 麻彦坤. 未成年犯童年期受虐待程度与攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 220-226.
[15]	衡书鹏, 赵换方, 熊建萍, 周宗奎. 网络募捐中求助者的面部表情对捐助意愿的影响：有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 92-99.