中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 应用潜剖面分析探索中小学教师人格类型，检验其对工作家庭平衡和工作绩效关系的调节作用。对贵州省895名中小学教师的调查结果表明：（1）中小学教师的人格可分为过度控制型、心理弹性型和情绪型三种类型，其中心理弹性型占比最高，情绪型次之，过度控制型最少，不同人格类型的教师工作绩效差异显著。（2）人格类型可以调节工作家庭平衡与工作绩效的关系，表现为心理弹性型和情绪型教师工作家庭平衡显著正向预测工作绩效，过度控制型教师工作家庭平衡对工作绩效的正向预测作用不显著。

关键词: 工作家庭平衡, 工作绩效, 大五人格, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract: Using the method of latent profile, the present study was to analyze and explore the personality types of primary and middle school teachers, and to test its role in regulating the relationship between work family balance and work performance. The results of a survey of 895 primary and middle school teachers in Guizhou showed that: 1) The personality of primary and middle school teachers could be classified into three types (i.e., over-controlling, mental resilient, and emotional). Among them, the proportion of teachers with mental resilient type was the highest, followed by the emotional type, and the proportion of teachers with over-controlling type was the least. There were significant differences in work performance between teachers of different personality types. 2) Personality types moderated the relationship between work family balance and work performance. The work family balance of teachers with mental resilient type or with emotional type was significantly positive in predicting work performance, while that of teachers with over-controlling personality had no positive predictive effect on work performance.

Key words: work family balance, work performance, big five personality, latent profile analysis

中图分类号:

B849

曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.

ZENG Lianping, TIAN Dandan, HUANG Yafu, ZHAO Shouying. Personality Types of Primary and Secondary School Teachers and Their Moderating Effects on the Relationship Between Work Family Balance and Work Performance[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.

参考文献

陈春晓, 张剑, 张莹, 田慧荣. (2020). 员工工作动机和工作投入与心理幸福感的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 34(1), 51–55
陈晓暾, 党艺伟, 葛雅利. (2019). 领导排斥对员工创新绩效的影响:反馈寻求行为和神经质的作用. 领导科学, (24), 87–90, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2019.24.026
姜红, 孙健敏, 姜金秋. (2017). 高校教师人格特征与工作绩效的关系: 组织认同的调节作用. 教师教育研究, 29(1), 79–86
金灿灿, 邹泓. (2013). 父母监控与青少年网络偏差行为的关系: 人格类型的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, (6), 63–68, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2013.06.012
李涛. (2019). 基于资源保存理论的人–组织匹配对高校青年教师工作满意度的影响研究——工作家庭平衡的中介作用. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 122–131
刘金培, 宋晓霞, 方琼红, 朱磊. (2017). 人格特征如何影响创新型员工工作绩效?——基于敬业度的中介作用. 科技管理研究, 37(4), 149–154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2017.04.026.
刘文婧, 许志星, 邹泓. (2012). 父母教养方式对青少年社会适应的影响:人格类型的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 625–633
刘正君. (2018). 领导宽恕与员工绩效——一个被有效调节的曲线模型. 领导科学, (20), 54–56, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2018.20.017
龙立荣. (2001). 职业生涯管理的结构及其关系研究 (博士学位论文). 中国科学院研究生院, 北京.
卢冬君. (2015). 基于组织行为学理论的中小学教师敬业度分析. 教育研究与实验, (3), 73–76
罗杰, 刘振会, 蹇世琼, 王孟成. (2019). 中文形容词大五人格量表简式版在小学教师群体中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(3), 534–538
苏斌原, 张洁婷, 喻承甫, 张卫. (2015). 大学生心理行为问题的识别:基于潜在剖面分析. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 350–359
汪先平. (2013). 小学教师专业性格的特征及塑造. 教学与管理, (21), 57–58
杨忠萍. (2019). 双职工工作家庭平衡的测评及其应用研究 (硕士学位论文). 贵州师范大学, 贵阳.
于悦, 周明洁, 郭昫澄, 贺琼, 张建新. (2016). 国企员工工作–家庭平衡对工作投入及满意度的影响:人格的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(3), 504–508
赵富强, 黄颢宇, 陈耘, 张秋红. (2018). 工作–家庭平衡型人力资源管理实践对工作绩效的影响:工作–家庭关系的中介作用与心理资本的调节作用. 中国人力资源开发, 35(11), 124–140
赵富强, 罗奎, 张光磊, 陈耘. (2016). 基于资源保存理论的工作家庭冲突对工作绩效的影响研究. 中国人力资源开发, 33(21), 25–33
邹佳颖. (2019). 中小学教师职业认同与工作绩效的关系——心理资本和工作–家庭增益的链式中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 济南大学.
邹容, 谢笑春, 李晶晶, 洪晓彬, 范翠英. (2019). 中学生人格类型与生活满意度的关系. 中国学校卫生, 40(10), 1506–1508
Carlson, D. S., Grzywacz, J. G., & Zivnuska, S. (2009). Is work-family balance more than conflict and enrichment? Human Relations, 62(10), 1459–1486, doi: 10.1177/0018726709336500.
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770, doi: 10.1177/0018726700536001.
Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 667–673, doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90237-J.
Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2015). Motivational basis of personality traits: A meta-analysis of value-personality correlations. Journal of Personality, 83(5), 491–510, doi: 10.1111/jopy.12125.
Gabriel, A. S., Daniels, M. A., Diefendorff, J. M., & Greguras, G. J. (2015). Emotional labor actors: A latent profile analysis of emotional labor strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 863–879, doi: 10.1037/a0037408.
Gould, S. (1979). Characteristics of career planners in upwardly mobile occupations. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 539–550.
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five Personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179, doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0837.
Jung Choi, H., & Tae Kim, Y. (2012). Work-family conflict, work-family facilitation, and job outcomes in the Korean hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(7), 1011–1028, doi: 10.1108/09596111211258892.
Kaya, C., Ataman, G., & Aydin, B. Y. (2017). Workplace ostracism and work engagement: The moderating role of neuroticism. International Journal of Business and Management, (2), 17–28.
Kinnunen, M. L., Metsäpelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., Kinnunen, U., … Pulkkinen, L. E. A. (2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(6), 512–522, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x.
Kokkinos, C. M. (2007). Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 229–243, doi: 10.1348/000709905X90344.
Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the Five Factor Model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022.
Muse, L. A., & Pichler, S. (2011). A comparison of types of support for lower-skill workers: Evidence for the importance of family supportive supervisors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 653–666, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.005.
Pazy, A. (1988). Joint responsibility: The relationships between organizational and individual career management and the effectiveness of careers. Group and Organization Management, 13(3), 311–331, doi: 10.1177/105960118801300305.
Perera, H. N., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 171–178, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034.
Tuteja, N., & Sharma, P. K. (2018). Linking job performance and Big Five Personality traits of employees in Chandigarh IT sector. Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science and English Language, 6(26), 7358–7370.
Zhang, J. T., Bray, B. C., Zhang, M. Q., & Lanza, S. T. (2015). Personality profiles and frequent heavy drinking in young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 18–21, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.054.
Zhang, X. T., Wang, M. C., He, L. N., Jie, L., & Deng, J. X. (2019). The development and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory-15. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0221621, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221621.

[1]	程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.
[2]	曾练平, 曾小叶, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 领悟社会支持与中小学教师工作绩效：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 404-411.
[3]	张馨予, 孙琦, 周广东, 李冰. 大学生进食障碍症状的潜在剖面分析及其与抑郁的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 73-79.
[4]	王嘉莹, 姚梅林, 刘红瑞. 成就目标与教师效能感、焦虑、工作投入的关系：基于变量中心和个体中心的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 122-129.
[5]	史滋福, 唐婉秋, 谢云天. 初中生认知需求与数学学业成绩的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[6]	吴旻, 孙丽萍, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 农村小学寄宿生心理资本的异质性及其社会适应：基于潜在剖面分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 186-192.
[7]	李昌竹, 郑士春, 陆梭, 张雨青, 刘正奎. 心率变异性与人格的神经质之间关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 275-280.
[8]	申正付, 韩布新, 杨秀木, 古继宝. 全科医生胜任力和主观幸福感：工作绩效的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 282-288.
[9]	缪佩君, 谢姗姗, 陈则飞, 连榕. 幼儿教师心理弹性与职业倦怠的关系：大五人格的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 512-517.
[10]	曾练平, 何明远, 潘运, 赵守盈. 工作家庭平衡双构面视角下社会支持对农村教师工作投入的影响：一个多重中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 518-524.
[11]	刘丹, 张建新, 张明妍. 纪检干部腐败容忍度与其组织忠诚的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 130-138.
[12]	冯永辉, 彭运石. 青少年压力与吸烟行为的关系：人格与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 697-701.
[13]	周浩, 龙立荣. 组织员工的工作疏离感: 人格特质与工作特征的交互效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 385-391.
[14]	赵雅文, 高岩研, 刘拓, 杨海波, 闫国利. 人格特质对微信用户朋友圈点赞行为动机影响的研究*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(2): 270-275.
[15]	李力,郑治国,廖晓明. 高校教师职业心理资本与工作绩效：社会支持的中介效应^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(6): 802-810.