航线飞行技术性技能与航线飞行阶段任务的关系研究

心理与行为研究 ›› 2010, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (2): 99-105.

航线飞行技术性技能与航线飞行阶段任务的关系研究

姬鸣^1,2,游旭群^1,2,杨仕云³,李瑛^1,2,常明^1,2

1 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300074;
2 陕西师范大学心理学院,西安 710062;
3 中国南方航空公司航空卫生管理部,广州 510405

收稿日期:2009-05-18 出版日期:2010-06-20 发布日期:2015-01-20
通讯作者: 游旭群,男,陕西师范大学心理学院教授,博士生导师。Email: youxuqun@snnu.edu.cn。
作者简介:姬鸣,男,陕西师范大学心理学院博士生。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目（05JJDXLX165）的资助

AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNICAL SKILLS AND LINE FLIGHT PHASES′ MISSION IN AIRLINES PILOTS

Ji Ming^1,2,You Xuqun^1,2,Yang Shiyun³,Li Ying^1,2,Chang Ming^1,2

1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior in Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074;
2 School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710062;
3 Aviation Medicine Center, China Southern Airlines Ltd., Guangzhou 510405

Received:2009-05-18 Online:2010-06-20 Published:2015-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过文献、专家意见和问卷调查,构建了现代航线飞行技术性技能多维评价量表。对118名航线飞行员测评数据的验证性因素分析表明,由倾斜控制、偏航控制、平衡控制和速度控制构成的4维模型在飞行准备/滑行、起飞/爬升、巡航、下降/进近/着陆四个飞行阶段均有较好的信度和效度;多元回归分析发现,各维度对不同航线飞行阶段任务均有显著影响。航线飞行技术性技能评价量表的构建为现代航线飞行员选拔与训练、机组驾驶行为规范性评价以及飞行安全管理考核模式的设计奠定了一个良好的工作基础。

关键词: 航线飞行, 技术性技能, 飞行阶段任务

Abstract: This article describes the establishment of multidimensional scale for the technical skills in airlines pilots basing on expert interview,literature analysis and questionnaire investigation. A sample of 118 airlines pilots completed a structured questionnaire of technical skills reflected through operating 4 common flight task in four lines flight phases. From a series of confirmatory factor analyses, 4 stable dimensions of technical skills were elicited as Pitch Control, Yaw Control, Trim Control and Speed Control. Further multiple regressions with these 4 dimensions as predictor variables were made,it was indicated that the scale had a higher predictive validity and discriminative validity. However, the significant predictors varied with the different flight phases′ mission. Multidimensional scale of flight technical skills could provide a good base for the design of airlines pilot selection, the diagnosis of the problematical flying behaviors and safety management in airlines.

Key words: line flight, technical skills, phases′mission

中图分类号:

B849

姬鸣,游旭群,杨仕云,李瑛,常明. 航线飞行技术性技能与航线飞行阶段任务的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2010, 8(2): 99-105.

Ji Ming,You Xuqun,Yang Shiyun,Li Ying,Chang Ming. AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TECHNICAL SKILLS AND LINE FLIGHT PHASES′ MISSION IN AIRLINES PILOTS[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2010, 8(2): 99-105.

参考文献

[1] Harper R P, Cooper G E. Handling qualities and pilot evaluation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dvnamtis. 1986, 9: 515-530
[2] Payne K H, Harris D. A Psychometric Approach to the Development of Multidimensional Scale to Assess Aircraft. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2000, 10(4): 343-362
[3] Longridge T, Bürki-Cohen J, Kendra A J. Simulator fidelity considerations for training and evaluation of today′s airline pilots. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH, 2001, 5-8
[4] U S Department of Defense. Flying qualities of piloted airplanes (MIL-F-8785C). Washington D C. Author, 1980
[5] U S Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Regulations. Part 25-Airworthiness Standards Washington D C. Author, 1974
[6] U. K Civil Aviation Authority. Joint Airworthiness Requirements (JAR 25-Large Aeroplanes). London: Author, 1978
[7] Cooper G E, Harper R P. The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handing qualities (NASA Tech. Rep. No.TN-D-5153). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center, 1969
[8] Cooper G E. Understanding and interpreting pilot opinion. Aeronautical Engineering Review. 1957, 16-47
[9] Harper R P. A revised pilot rating scare for the evaluation of handing qualities. Paper presented at the AGARD Specialists meeting on stability and control, Cambridge, England, 1966
[10] Hart S G, Staveland L E. Development of the NASA task load index (TLX): Results of empirical and theoretical research//Hancock P A, Meshkati N, et al. Human mental workload . Amsterdam North-Holland, 1988. 139-183
[11] U. K Civil Aviation Authority. British Civil Airworthiness Requirements (BCAR 25-Large Aeroplanes). London: Author, 1981
[12] Weirwille W W, Casali J G. A validated rating scale for global mental workload measurement application. Proceedings of the Human Factor Society 27th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factor Society, 1983: 129-133
[13] Wilson D J, Riley D R. Cooper-Harper rating variability. Paper presented at the American Institute of Aeronautics Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Boston, 1989
[14] Field G A. Flying qualities of transport aircraft J, Payne K, et al. The Cranfield Aircraft Handling Qualities Rating Scale A multidimensional approach to the assessment of aircraft handling qualities. The Aeronautical Journal, 2000, 104: 191-198
[15] Helmreich R L. Culture, Threat, and Error: Assessing System Safety. In Safety in Aviation: The Management Commitment: Proceedings of a Conference. London: Royal Aeronautical Society, 2000