The Relationship Between Emotional Understanding and Social Mindfulness in 3~6 Year Old Children: A Moderated Mediation Model

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.012

Abstract

Abstract:

A survey of 211 children aged 3~6 years old were conducted to examine the development characteristics of social mindfulness, as well as the influence mechanism between emotional understanding, theory of mind and social mindfulness. The results showed that: 1) there was a significant age difference in the development of social mindfulness in 3~6 year old children; 2) emotional understanding significantly positively predicted the development of social mindfulness; 3) theory of mind partially mediated the relation between emotional understanding and social mindfulness; 4) age moderated the first half of the mediation effect of theory of mind. These results indicate that emotional understanding affects social mindfulness through theory of mind. Furthermore, the predictive effect of emotional understanding on social mindfulness is enhanced with the increase of age.

Key words: social mindfulness, emotional understanding, theory of mind, 3~6 year old children

摘要：

为探讨3～6岁幼儿社会善念的发展特点以及情绪理解、心理理论对社会善念的影响机制，采用测验法对211名3～6岁幼儿进行了调查，结果显示：(1)3～6岁幼儿社会善念发展存在显著年龄差异；(2)情绪理解显著正向预测幼儿社会善念的发展；(3)心理理论在幼儿情绪理解和社会善念之间起着部分中介作用；(4)年龄调节了心理理论中介效应的前段路径。结果表明：情绪理解通过心理理论影响社会善念，随着幼儿年龄增长，情绪理解对心理理论的预测作用增强。

关键词: 社会善念, 情绪理解, 心理理论, 3~6岁幼儿

Fei DAN, Yueyi MA, Longhao CONG. The Relationship Between Emotional Understanding and Social Mindfulness in 3~6 Year Old Children: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 666-672.

但菲, 马岳毅, 丛龙昊. 3～6岁幼儿情绪理解与社会善念的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 666-672.

Figures/Tables 6

References 0

	陈英和, 崔艳丽, 王雨晴. 幼儿心理理论与情绪理解发展及关系的研究. 心理科学, 2005, 28 (3): 527- 532. DOI
	但菲, 徐桂娟, 索长清, 赵琳, 孙倩倩. 幼儿情绪理解能力的发展特点. 教育导刊(下半月), 2011, (1): 28- 32.
	窦凯. (2016). 感知社会正念: 有效促进合作行为的心理机制(博士学位论文). 暨南大学, 广州.
	郭滢, 肖红蕊, 龚先旻, 王大华. 情绪影响错误记忆认知机制的年龄差异. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38 (1): 17- 25.
	李丹丹. (2023). 偏好信息对于4至10岁儿童社会善念理解的影响(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
	李梓嘉, 赵欣. (2022). 给他人留选择: 儿童早期社会善念行为的发展. 见第二十四届全国心理学学术会议摘要集 (pp. 1341–1342), 中国心理学会, 新乡.
	刘俊升, 周颖, 李丹, 陈欣银. 儿童中期和青春期早期独处偏好与心理适应之关系: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 2015, 47 (8): 1004- 1012.
	王娟, 汪鑫鑫. 母亲语言支架预测儿童亲社会行为: 儿童情绪理解的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (1): 19- 23.
	王小英, 张玉梅, 王丽娟, 刘凤玲. 3~6岁儿童情绪理解过程: 情绪表现、归因和调节. 心理科学, 2010, 33 (4): 985- 987.
	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 2014, 46 (5): 714- 726.
	肖琼华. (2006). 幼儿移情影响因素的研究(硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学, 长春.
	于爽. 情绪作为内感受的外在行动推理——一种基于预测加工的情绪理解. 中国社会科学评价, 2023, 33 (1): 38- 46, 158.
	袁博, 廖苏霞, 郭俏俏, 高奇扬, 陈思宇. 流动儿童的社会善念水平及其提升. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (2): 268- 273. DOI
	张晶晶, 杨颖, 胡清芬. 儿童推断他人知识状态的知识偏差和无知偏差. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14 (5): 618- 625. DOI
	赵欣, 李丹丹, 杨向东. 学龄前儿童社会善念理解的发展与心理理论的关系. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (8): 892- 904.
	周双珠, 陈英和, 胡竹菁. 道德和个人领域儿童情绪理解的发展特点及对其亲社会行为的影响. 心理学探新, 2017, 37 (1): 41- 47.
	Araya, J. M. (2018). Emotion and predictive processing: emotions as perceptions?(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
	Bolin, J. H. Andrew F. Hayes (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2014, 51 (3): 335- 337. DOI
	Conte, E., Grazzani, I., & Pepe, A. Social cognition, language, and prosocial behaviors: A multitrait mixed-methods study in early childhood. Early Education and Development, 2018, 29 (6): 814- 830. DOI
	Flavell, J. H. (2002). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. In W. W. Hartup & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), Growing points in developmental science (p. 384). London: Psychology Press.
	Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 2008, 19 (4): 378- 384. DOI
	Happé, F. G. E., Winner, E., & Brownell, H. The getting of wisdom: theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 1998, 34 (2): 358- 362. DOI
	Ibanez, A., & Schulte, M. Situated minds: Conceptual and emotional blending in neurodegeneration and beyond. Brain, 2020, 143 (12): 3523- 3525. DOI
	Izard, C. E., & Harris, P. (1995). Emotional development and developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 467–503). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
	Longobardi, E., Spataro, P., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. Direct and indirect associations of empathy, theory of mind, and language with prosocial behavior: Gender differences in primary school children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2019, 180 (6): 266- 279. DOI
	Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & De Rosnay, M. Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental periods and hierarchical organization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2004, 1 (2): 127- 152. DOI
	Sarmento-Henrique, R., Quintanilla, L., Lucas-Molina, B., Recio, P., & Giménez-Dasí, M. The longitudinal interplay of emotion understanding, theory of mind, and language in the preschool years. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2020, 44 (3): 236- 245. DOI
	Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 2000, 76 (1): 59- 90. DOI
	van Doesum, N. J., de Vries, R. E., Blokland, A. A. J., Hill, J. M., Kuhlman, D. M., Stivers, A. W., ... van Lange, P. A. Social mindfulness: Prosocial the active way. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2020, 15 (2): 183- 193. DOI
	van Doesum, N. J., van Lange, D. A. W., & van Lange, P. A. M. Social mindfulness: Skill and will to navigate the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013, 105 (1): 86- 103. DOI
	van Lange, P. A., & van Doesum, N. J. Social mindfulness and social hostility. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 3, 18- 24. DOI
	Weimer, A. A., Sallquist, J., & Bolnick, R. R. Young children’s emotion comprehension and theory of mind understanding. Early Education & Development, 2012, 23 (3): 280- 301.
	Wellman, H. M., Fang, F. X., Liu, D., Zhu, L. Q., & Liu, G. X. Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 2006, 17 (12): 1075- 1081. DOI
	Zhao, X., Zhao, X., Gweon, H., & Kushnir, T. Leaving a choice for others: Children’s evaluations of considerate, socially-mindful actions. Child Development, 2021, 92 (4): 1238- 1253. DOI

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4
1.心理理论	1.76	1.10
2.情绪理解	2.33	0.88	0.57***
3.社会善念	2.07	1.28	0.29***	0.29***
4.社会善念感知	1.37	0.82	0.31**	0.26**	0.79**
5.社会善念选择	0.70	0.80	0.14*	0.20**	0.78**	0.24**

变量	M	SD	1	2	3	4
1.心理理论	1.76	1.10
2.情绪理解	2.33	0.88	0.57***
3.社会善念	2.07	1.28	0.29***	0.29***
4.社会善念感知	1.37	0.82	0.31**	0.26**	0.79**
5.社会善念选择	0.70	0.80	0.14*	0.20**	0.78**	0.24**

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t	95%CI
社会善念		0.31	0.10	11.15***
	性别				0.30	1.77	[−0.03, 0.63]
	情绪理解				0.44	4.59***	[0.25, 0.64]
心理理论		0.57	0.33	51.20***
	性别				−0.03	−0.22	[−0.28, 0.22]
	情绪理解				0.72	9.98***	[0.57, 0.86]
社会善念		0.34	0.12	9.27***
	性别				0.31	1.82	[−0.03, 0.64]
	情绪理解				0.30	2.53*	[0.06, 0.53]
	心理理论				0.21	2.26*	[0.03, 0.39]

结果变量	预测变量	R	R²	F	β	t	95%CI
社会善念		0.31	0.10	11.15***
	性别				0.30	1.77	[−0.03, 0.63]
	情绪理解				0.44	4.59***	[0.25, 0.64]
心理理论		0.57	0.33	51.20***
	性别				−0.03	−0.22	[−0.28, 0.22]
	情绪理解				0.72	9.98***	[0.57, 0.86]
社会善念		0.34	0.12	9.27***
	性别				0.31	1.82	[−0.03, 0.64]
	情绪理解				0.30	2.53*	[0.06, 0.53]
	心理理论				0.21	2.26*	[0.03, 0.39]

	Effect	BootSE	95%CI	相对效应值(%)
总效应	0.45	0.10	[0.25, 0.64]
直接效应	0.30	0.12	[0.60, 0.84]	66.29
中介效应	0.15	0.07	[0.02, 0.28]	33.71