
Studies of Psychology and Behavior ›› 2022, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 850-857.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.06.019
• ? • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hongxia LI, Yanli XU, Yiquan FANG, Kaiyue GUO, Jiwei SI(
)
Received:2022-06-12
Online:2022-11-20
Published:2022-11-20
Contact:
Jiwei SI
通讯作者:
司继伟
基金资助:CLC Number:
Hongxia LI, Yanli XU, Yiquan FANG, Kaiyue GUO, Jiwei SI. Reliability and Validity of the Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale in Chinese Primary School Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(6): 850-857.
李红霞, 徐艳丽, 方怡泉, 郭凯玥, 司继伟. 简版数学焦虑量表在中国小学儿童群体中的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 850-857.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://psybeh.tjnu.edu.cn/EN/10.12139/j.1672-0628.2022.06.019
| 年龄 | 性别 | n | ||||
| M | SD | 男生 | 女生 | |||
| 性别 | ||||||
| 男生 | 8.84 | 1.59 | 527 | |||
| 女生 | 8.81 | 1.47 | 440 | |||
| 年级 | ||||||
| 1 | 6.34 | 0.27 | 75 | 65 | 140 | |
| 2 | 7.36 | 0.61 | 78 | 63 | 141 | |
| 3 | 8.24 | 0.84 | 87 | 62 | 149 | |
| 4 | 9.22 | 0.57 | 100 | 85 | 185 | |
| 5 | 10.10 | 0.52 | 92 | 78 | 170 | |
| 6 | 11.01 | 0.61 | 95 | 87 | 182 | |
| 地区 | ||||||
| 城市 | 7.97 | 0.85 | 155 | 143 | 298 | |
| 县城 | 9.09 | 0.63 | 348 | 321 | 669 | |
| 总体 | 8.82 | 1.46 | 967 | |||
| 年龄 | 性别 | n | ||||
| M | SD | 男生 | 女生 | |||
| 性别 | ||||||
| 男生 | 8.84 | 1.59 | 527 | |||
| 女生 | 8.81 | 1.47 | 440 | |||
| 年级 | ||||||
| 1 | 6.34 | 0.27 | 75 | 65 | 140 | |
| 2 | 7.36 | 0.61 | 78 | 63 | 141 | |
| 3 | 8.24 | 0.84 | 87 | 62 | 149 | |
| 4 | 9.22 | 0.57 | 100 | 85 | 185 | |
| 5 | 10.10 | 0.52 | 92 | 78 | 170 | |
| 6 | 11.01 | 0.61 | 95 | 87 | 182 | |
| 地区 | ||||||
| 城市 | 7.97 | 0.85 | 155 | 143 | 298 | |
| 县城 | 9.09 | 0.63 | 348 | 321 | 669 | |
| 总体 | 8.82 | 1.46 | 967 | |||
| 项目 | 因子载荷 | |
| 数学评估焦虑 | 学习数学焦虑 | |
| 2 | 0.74 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.16 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.24 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| 1 | 0.30 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.26 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.33 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.21 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.29 | 0.51 |
| 项目 | 因子载荷 | |
| 数学评估焦虑 | 学习数学焦虑 | |
| 2 | 0.74 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.16 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.24 |
| 8 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| 1 | 0.30 | 0.62 |
| 3 | 0.26 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.33 | 0.59 |
| 7 | 0.21 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.29 | 0.51 |
| 工具 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. AMAS-C | |||||
| 2. AMAS-CE | 0.80*** | ||||
| 3. AMAS-CL | 0.91*** | 0.52*** | |||
| 4. MASC | 0.82*** | 0.73*** | 0.72*** | ||
| 5. GA | 0.35*** | 0.30*** | 0.30*** | 0.45*** | |
| 6. TAS | 0.56*** | 0.40*** | 0.56*** | 0.54*** | 0.26*** |
| 工具 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 1. AMAS-C | |||||
| 2. AMAS-CE | 0.80*** | ||||
| 3. AMAS-CL | 0.91*** | 0.52*** | |||
| 4. MASC | 0.82*** | 0.73*** | 0.72*** | ||
| 5. GA | 0.35*** | 0.30*** | 0.30*** | 0.45*** | |
| 6. TAS | 0.56*** | 0.40*** | 0.56*** | 0.54*** | 0.26*** |
| 模型 | 拟合指数 | 模型比较 | ||||||
| S-Bχ2 | df | CFI | RMSEA | Δχ2(df) | ΔCFI | p | ||
| 性别 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 106.14 | 52 | 0.98 | 0.04 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 107.70 | 59 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 1.67(7)a | 0.002a | >0.05 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 113.82 | 66 | 0.98 | 0.03 | 6.11(7)b | 0.001b | >0.05 | |
| 年级 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 212.95 | 104 | 0.96 | 0.06 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 268.82 | 125 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 55.88(21)a | 0.008a | <0.01 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 403.71 | 139 | 0.90 | 0.07 | 134.89(14)b | 0.044b | <0.001 | |
| 地区 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 107.84 | 41 | 0.96 | 0.06 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 116.51 | 58 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 8.67(17)a | 0.001a | >0.05 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 120.25 | 65 | 0.96 | 0.05 | 3.74(7)b | 0.002b | >0.05 | |
| 模型 | 拟合指数 | 模型比较 | ||||||
| S-Bχ2 | df | CFI | RMSEA | Δχ2(df) | ΔCFI | p | ||
| 性别 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 106.14 | 52 | 0.98 | 0.04 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 107.70 | 59 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 1.67(7)a | 0.002a | >0.05 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 113.82 | 66 | 0.98 | 0.03 | 6.11(7)b | 0.001b | >0.05 | |
| 年级 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 212.95 | 104 | 0.96 | 0.06 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 268.82 | 125 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 55.88(21)a | 0.008a | <0.01 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 403.71 | 139 | 0.90 | 0.07 | 134.89(14)b | 0.044b | <0.001 | |
| 地区 | ||||||||
| A. 形态等值 | 107.84 | 41 | 0.96 | 0.06 | ||||
| B. 负荷等值 | 116.51 | 58 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 8.67(17)a | 0.001a | >0.05 | |
| C. 尺度等值 | 120.25 | 65 | 0.96 | 0.05 | 3.74(7)b | 0.002b | >0.05 | |
| 崔吉芳, 李嫩晓, 陈英和 数学焦虑影响儿童数学任务表现的作用机制探析. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (2): 118- 125. | |
| 耿柳娜, 陈英和 数学焦虑对儿童加减法认知策略选择和执行的影响. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21 (4): 24- 27. | |
| 秦燕琼. (2019). 小学中高年级数学考试焦虑问卷的编制及初步应用 (硕士学位论文). 上海师范大学. | |
| 司继伟, 郭凯玥, 赵晓萌, 张明亮, 李红霞, 黄碧娟, 徐艳丽 小学儿童数学焦虑的潜在类别转变及其父母教育卷入效应: 3年纵向考察. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (4): 355- 370. | |
| 王梦媛. (2018). 小学生数学焦虑对数学成绩的影响及其正念干预研究 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆. | |
| 于海媚, 陈瑶瑶, 何江柳, 胡兴旺, 韦嘉 中文简式数学焦虑量表在初中生群体中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (6): 1198- 1202. | |
| 张婕, 黄碧娟, 司继伟, 官冬晓 乡镇小学生的数学焦虑与数学成绩: 数学自我效能感和数学元认知的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34 (4): 453- 460. | |
|
Ashcraft, M. H. Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002, 11 (5): 181- 185.
DOI |
|
|
Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. The modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, 11.
DOI |
|
|
Deloache, J. S. Dual representation and young children’s use of scale models. Child Development, 2000, 71 (2): 329- 338.
DOI |
|
|
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. Girls and mathematics—A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2007, 22 (4): 497- 514.
DOI |
|
|
Ganley, C. M., & Vasilyeva, M. The role of anxiety and working memory in gender differences in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014, 106 (1): 105- 120.
DOI |
|
|
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Scofield, J. E. In-class attention, spatial ability, and mathematics anxiety predict across-grade gains in adolescents’ mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021, 113 (4): 754- 769.
DOI |
|
|
Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics. Psychological Science, 2013, 24 (10): 2079- 2087.
DOI |
|
|
Harari, R. R., Vukovic, R. K., & Bailey, S. P. Mathematics anxiety in young children: An exploratory study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 2013, 81 (4): 538- 555.
DOI |
|
| Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 111–135, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000725. | |
|
Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. Common spatial organization of number and emotional expression: A mental magnitude line. Brain and Cognition, 2011, 77 (2): 315- 323.
DOI |
|
|
Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 2003, 10 (2): 178- 182.
DOI |
|
|
Jameson, M. M. The development and validation of the children’s anxiety in math scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2013, 31 (4): 391- 395.
DOI |
|
|
Jamieson, J. P., Black, A. E., Pelaia, L. E., & Reis, H. T. The impact of mathematics anxiety on stress appraisals, neuroendocrine responses, and academic performance in a community college sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021, 113 (6): 1164- 1176.
DOI |
|
|
Li, H. X., Zhang, A. X., Zhang, M. L., Huang, B. J., Zhao, X. M., Gao, J., & Si, J. W. Concurrent and longitudinal associations between parental educational involvement, teacher support, and math anxiety: The role of math learning involvement in elementary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2021, 66, 101984.
DOI |
|
|
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93 (3): 568- 592.
DOI |
|
|
Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2016, 141, 83- 100.
DOI |
|
|
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2013, 14 (2): 187- 202.
DOI |
|
|
Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., & Dieckmann, N. F. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 2009, 135 (6): 943- 973.
DOI |
|
| Sarason, I. G. (1978). The test anxiety scale: Concept and research. In C. D. Spielberger & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. 5, pp. 193–216). Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. | |
|
Spence, S. H., Rapee, R., McDonald, C., & Ingram, M. The structure of anxiety symptoms among preschoolers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2001, 39 (11): 1293- 1316.
DOI |
|
|
Tomasetto, C., Morsanyi, K., Guardabassi, V., & O’Connor, P. A. Math anxiety interferes with learning novel mathematics contents in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021, 113 (2): 315- 329.
DOI |
|
| Xie, F., Xin, Z. Q., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2019). Gender difference of Chinese high school students’ math anxiety: The effects of self-esteem, test anxiety and general anxiety. Sex Roles, 81(3–4), 235–244, doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0982-9. |
| [1] | Zeqi LIU, Yuhua LI, Yan GAO, Jiaxin LIU, Mengmeng SU. Development and Validation of the Home Literacy Environment Scale for Chinese Children [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2026, 24(1): 113-121. |
| [2] | Xiaoting ZHAO, Haidong LIU, Li LI, Libin ZHANG, Guangzhen ZAHNG, Yunyun ZHANG. Development of a Group Assessment Tool for Social Domain in Children Aged 3-6 Years [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(5): 653-661. |
| [3] | Wenbo YU, Hetong QI, Tianlin WANG, Dandan LIANG. Assessing the Reliability of Statistical Learning Measures: Effects of Modality, Material, and Task [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(6): 814-821. |
| [4] | Wenli LIAO, Shuang ZHONG, Qian FAN, Huachun XU. Revision of Positive and Negative Risk-Taking Questionnaire Among Chinese College Students [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(6): 839-846. |
| [5] | Hongwei NIU, Jiajia HAO, Xuejun BAI. Development and Validation of Chinese College Students Failure Mindset Scale [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 379-386. |
| [6] | Shouying ZHAO, Rongrong REN, Wei CHEN, Bangjun MU. Development and Validation of Numerical Reasoning Test for Grade 7~8 Students [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 387-394. |
| [7] | Xin GUO, Wen LIU, Jiaqi ZHANG, Lingxiang XIA, Jie WU, Yining WANG. Social Adjustment Questionnaire for Students in Grades 4 to 9: Reliability and Validity Test in a Large Sample [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 395-401. |
| [8] | Zhao ZHOU, Shunxin JI, Tuo LIU. Development of the Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale Short and Very Short Version [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(6): 846-853. |
| [9] | Haibo YANG, Xinyu ZHANG. Revision and Evaluation of Diagnostic Efficiency for the Simplified Chinese Version of the Ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(5): 658-666. |
| [10] | Ping FANG, Zijian YI, Yuan JIANG, Hui PANG. The Development of People’s Social Adaptation Scale [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 433-439. |
| [11] | Hui PANG, Xiaonan JIN, Yuan JIANG, Ping FANG. The Development of People’s Social Risk Perception Scale [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 440-445. |
| [12] | Liu YANG, Wei DU, Ping FANG, Yuan JIANG. The Development and Validation of Social Emotion Scale [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2023, 21(4): 446-453. |
| [13] | MIAO Xiuying, CHI Lizhong. The Impact of the Affect Heuristic on Risky Choice [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2022, 20(3): 325-331. |
| [14] | WANG Yanli, CHEN Hong. The Development of Sense of Gain Questionnaire Among Urban Community Residents [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 665-670. |
| [15] | LIU Wen, MENG Xiangrui, CHE Hanbo, ZHANG Jiaqi, SHEN Yi. Development, Psychometric Reliability and Validity of Pupils’ Creative Personality Questionnaire Based on Teacher’s Descriptions [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(5): 624-630. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||