副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨汉语阅读中副中央凹预视加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用，本研究使用了边界范式，边界位于双字词（词N）后，操纵了副中央凹中双字词首字（N+1）与尾字（N+2）的预视类型，分别为能够提供有效预视信息的目标预视与不能提供有效预视信息的假字预视。结果发现：在从前目标词到目标词的眼跳长度上，字N+1目标预视下的眼跳长度显著地长于假字预视；当字N+1为目标预视时，字N+2目标预视下从前目标词到目标词的眼跳长度显著地长于假字预视，而当字N+1为假字预视时，字N+2的预视类型并不对从前目标词到目标词上的眼跳长度产生显著影响。结果表明，副中央凹的加工影响眼跳目标的选择，副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2的预视加工均会影响眼跳目标选择，字N+2的预视加工对眼跳目标选择的影响受字N+1预视加工负荷的调节。

关键词: 副中央凹加工, 眼跳目标, 汉语阅读, 眼动

Abstract: Whether both the processing of character N+1 and character N+2 in parafoveal affects the target selection during Chinese reading or not is still unknown. In current study, the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975) was used to investigate this question, the previews of character N+1 and character N+2 which are belonged to a two-character word were manipulated, identical character or pseudocharacter were used as these two kind of previews. Results showed that fixation durations on target word were significantly shorter when the preview of character N+1 was identical than when it was a pseudocharacter. the same pattern appeared when both of the previews of character N+1 and character N+2 were identical, compared to the the previews of character N+2 was pseudocharacter. The length of the outgoing saccade from the pretarget to the target region was significantly longer when the preview of character N+1 was identical compared to when it was a pseudocharacter. And when the preview of character N+1 was identical, the length of the outgoing saccade from the pretarget to the target region was significantly longer when the preview of character N+2 was identical compared to when it was a pseudocharacter. However, changing previews of character N+2 had no influence on the outgoing saccade when the preview of character N+1 was a pseudocharacter. The results indicated that character N+1 and character N+2 were preprocessed in the parafoveal before they were fixated. Parafoveal processing of character N+1 modulated the saccade target selection. The effect of parafoveal processing of character N+2 on saccade target selection is modulated by the processing load of character N+1.

Key words: Chinese reading, parafoveal processing, target selection, eye movement

中图分类号:

B842.5

王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.

WANG Yongsheng, CHEN Mingjing, ZHAO Bingjie, LI Xin, BAI Yuge. The Parafoveal processing of Character N+1 and Character N+2 Serially Influence the Target Selection During Chinese Reading[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.

参考文献

白学军, 梁菲菲, 闫国利, 田瑾, 臧传丽, 孟红霞. (2012). 词边界信息在中文阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用: 来自中文二语学习者的证据. 心理学报, 44(7), 853-867.
白学军, 王永胜, 郭志英, 高晓雷, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读中词N+2的预视对高频词N+1加工影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 47(2), 143-156.
李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459-470.
李玉刚, 黄忍, 滑慧敏, 李兴珊. (2017). 阅读中的眼跳目标选择问题. 心理科学进展, 25(3), 404-412.
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1-11.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.
Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277-1287.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamic model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
Kliegl, R., Risse, S., & Laubrock, J. (2007). Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word N+2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1250-1255.
Li, X. S., Bicknell, K., Liu, P. P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895-913.
Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location?. Vision Research, 51(10), 1146-1156.
Li, X. S., Liu, P. P., & Rayner, K. (2015). Saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 524-530.
Li, X. S., & Shen, W. (2013). Joint effect of insertion of spaces and word length in saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(S1), S64-S77.
Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2013). Optimal viewing position effects in the processing of isolated Chinese words. Vision Research, 81, 45-57.
Liu, P. P., & Li, X. S. (2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57-68.
Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1229-1236.
Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. S. (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 1008-1025.
Ma, G. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). How character complexity modulates eye movement control in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 747-761.
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2015). There is no relationship between preferred viewing location and word segmentation in Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 23(3), 399-414.
Ma, G. J., Li, X. S., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pre-target fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1409-1419.
McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28(10), 1107-1118.
Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 268-281
O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 185-197.
Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Space information is important for reading. Vision Research, 49(15), 1994-2000.
Pollatseka, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: the role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 8(6), 817-833.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65-81.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words. Perception, 8(1), 21-30.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38(8), 1129-1144.
Radach, R., Inhoff, A. W., Glover, L., & Vorstius, C. (2013). Contextual constraint and N+2 preview effects in reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 619-633.
Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445-526.
Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482-490.
Tsai, J. L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 159-176). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Wei, W., Li, X. S., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Properties of fixated words affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading. Vision Research, 80(22), 1-6.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Shu, H., Pan, J., & Zhou, X. L. (2010). Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1669-1676.
Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2016). CarPrice versus CarpRice: Word boundary ambiguity influences saccade target selection during the reading of Chinese Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(11), 1832-1838.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725.
Yan, G. L., Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259-268.
Yang, H. M,, & McConkie, G. W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H. C. Chen(Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 20-222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Yang, J. M., Wang, S. P., Xu, Y. M., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word N+2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(4), 1192-1204.
Yang, J. M., Rayner, K., Li, N., & Wang, S. P. (2012). Is preview benefit from word n+2 a common effect in reading Chinese? Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1079-1091.
Zang, C. L., Liang, F. F., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 720-734.

[1]	贾宁, 容丽卓, 代景华. 社会性线索对内隐和外显元认知监控的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 593-599.
[2]	李士一, 谢岩枫, 赵光, 白学军. 媒体多任务经验对不同注意模式下内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 433-440.
[3]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[4]	王永胜, 何立媛, 李馨, 白学军. 副中央凹低频双字词首字字频的预视效应研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 311-317.
[5]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 龙梦灵. 首词素位置概率信息未参与汉语阅读的词切分：基于副中央凹加工的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 318-324.
[6]	何立媛, 赵星, 白玉, 刘妮娜. 汉语老年读者的多词单元加工：来自眼动研究的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 160-166.
[7]	秦钊, 王影超, 叶佳滢, 袁小源, 闫国利. 聋人句子阅读中的视觉功能补偿现象：副中央凹−中央凹效应的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 167-173.
[8]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[9]	赵赛男, 李琳, 张俐娟, 王敬欣. 汉语阅读中高限制性语境对不可预测词加工的影响：眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[10]	梁菲菲, 向颖, 武浩, 韩洋. 汉语发展性阅读障碍小学生词边界划分的发展研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 757-763.
[11]	刘璐, 姜雅梅, 张巧明, 李诸洋. 义符位置与语义透明度对形声字语义激活的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[12]	李赛男, 闫国利, 王亚丽, 刘敏, 赵淑萍. 一年级小学生阅读知觉广度的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[13]	张苏媛, 兰泽波, 张水, 孟珠, 闫国利. 无关言语对一年级小学生阅读影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[14]	高晓雷, 沈梦, 任晓飞, 白学军, 高蕾. 高、低汉语水平藏–汉读者汉语阅读知觉广度及预视效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 297-303,333.
[15]	贺斐, 梁菲菲, 白学军. 汉语阅读伴随词汇学习的形旁类别一致性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 304-311.