跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？

心理与行为研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 311-317.

跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？

张慢慢^1,2,3, 张志超², 臧传丽^1,2,3

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津 300387;
2. 天津师范大学心理学部，天津 300387;
3. 学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387

收稿日期:2019-12-05 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-07-17
通讯作者: 臧传丽，E-mail：zangchuanli@163.com
作者简介:张慢慢，E-mail：zhangmanman289@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31571122，31800920）；天津市人才发展特殊支持计划青年拔尖人才项目；天津师范大学杰出青年创新团队项目（52WZ1702）

Is Skipping Based on Full or Partial Processing of the Parafoveal Word in Chinese Reading?

ZHANG Manman^1,2,3, ZHANG Zhichao², ZANG Chuanli^1,2,3

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
3. Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin 300387

Received:2019-12-05 Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-07-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨词跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工，实验选用高预测词作为副中央凹目标词，通过边界范式来操纵目标词的预视：高预测预视（一致预视）、低预测预视、与目标词正字法相似的假字预视、与目标词正字法不相似的假字预视。对目标词的分析发现：（1）正字法相似的假字预视下对目标词的跳读率显著大于正字法不相似的假字预视；（2）高预测预视与低预测预视下对目标词的跳读没有显著差异，但前者总注视时间比后者短。实验结果说明，从副中央凹词提取的正字法预视信息足够使中文读者做出跳读的决定，研究结果在一定程度上支持跳读基于副中央凹词部分加工的观点。

关键词: 词跳读, 预测性, 副中央凹预视, 中文阅读

Abstract: In order to explore whether or not word skipping is based on the full or partial processing of the parafoveal word, a high predictable word was selected as the target word, of which the preview was an identity, a low predictable word, a visually similar pseudocharacter, or visually dissimilar pseudocharacter by using the boundary paradigm. Analyses of the target words showed that the skipping rate was higher for the visually similar pseudocharacter preview than the visually dissimilar pseudocharacter preview. Total fixations were longer for high predictability preview compared with the low predictability preview, though skipping rates were similar between the two conditions. Our finding indicates that Chinese readers use orthographical information from the parafoveal word to make a skipping decision, indicating that to some extent word skipping decisions can be made on the basis of partial processing prior to fixating the word in the parafovea.

Key words: word skipping, predictability, parafoveal preview, Chinese reading

中图分类号:

B842

张慢慢, 张志超, 臧传丽. 跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 311-317.

ZHANG Manman, ZHANG Zhichao, ZANG Chuanli. Is Skipping Based on Full or Partial Processing of the Parafoveal Word in Chinese Reading?[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2020, 18(3): 311-317.

参考文献

白学军, 曹玉肖, 顾俊娟, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2011). 可预测性和空格对中文阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 34(6), 1282-1288
白学军, 刘娟, 臧传丽, 张慢慢, 郭晓峰, 闫国利. (2011). 中文阅读过程中的副中央凹预视效应. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1721-1729
白学军, 刘丽萍, 闫国利. (2008). 阅读句子过程中词跳读的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31(5), 1045-1048
陈宝国, 王立新, 彭聃龄. (2003). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究 (Ⅱ). 心理学报, 35(5), 576-581
王穗苹, 佟秀红, 杨锦绵, 冷英. (2009). 中文句子阅读中语义信息对眼动预视效应的影响. 心理学报, 41(3), 220-232
王永胜, 赵冰洁, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理学报, 50(12), 1336-1345
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605
臧传丽, 鹿子佳, 白玉, 张慢慢. (2018). 阅读过程中的词跳读及其产生的认知机制. 心理与行为研究, 16(4), 477-483, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2018.04.007
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364-390, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90013-1.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implications for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125-147). Oxford: Elsevier.
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5, e10729, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729.
Drieghe, D. (2008). Foveal processing and word skipping during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 856-860.
Drieghe, D., Desmet, T., & Brysbaert, M. (2007). How important are linguistic factors in word skipping during reading? British Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 157-171, doi: 10.1348/000712606X111258.
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(5), 954-969, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954.
Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 787-800). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Li, X. S., Zang, C. L., Liversedge, S. P., & Pollatsek, A. (2015). The role of words reading. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 232-244). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C. L., Zhang, M. M., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Drieghe, D. (2014). The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 441-457.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/fullrefman.pdf.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 65-81, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception and Psychophysics, 58(5), 734-747, doi: 10.3758/BF03213106.
Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720-732, doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720.
Rayner, K., Li, X. S., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. L. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1089-1093.
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011). Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(2), 514-528, doi: 10.1037/a0020990.
Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial-attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 767-786). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Reichle, E. D., & Drieghe, D. (2013). Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1311-1320, doi: 10.1037/a0030910.
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.
Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and n+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 309-333.
Yan, G. L., Bai, X. J., Zang, C. L., Bian, Q., Cui, L., Qi, W.,.. Liversedge, S. P. (2012). Using stroke removal to investigate Chinese character identification during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 951-979, doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9295-x.
Zang, C. L., Fu, Y., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(12), 1831-1841, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000589.
Zang, C. L., Zhang, M. M., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., Angele, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2018). Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle de in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 152-160, doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1272617.
Zhang, M. M., Liversedge, S. P., Bai, X. J., Yan, G. L., & Zang, C. L. (2019). The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(6), 812-825, doi: 10.1037/xhp0000644.

[1]	仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, 齐琦. 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 450-456.
[2]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[3]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[4]	张嘉欣, 陈璇, 钱彬彬, 韩丹, 王璐, 张智君. 事件切割对时距知觉的影响：基于记忆碎片效应的研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 145-151.
[5]	仝文, 任梦雪, 刘志方, 冯笑. 词长对中文阅读眼跳目标选择的影响：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 168-175.
[6]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. 汉字位置加工的词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 193-199.
[7]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[8]	刘志方王若逸，张智君，刘炜. 中文阅读中基于字、词的眼跳目标选择策略：来自消失文本方面的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 27-35.
[9]	闫国利, 何立媛, 宋子明. 中文阅读的基本信息加工单元初探^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 120-126.
[10]	马谐, 刘佳, 刘艳, 陶云, 张秋月, 陈睿. 背景音乐对中—英文阅读理解的影响效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 472-478.
[11]	张巧明，崔磊. 小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.
[12]	仝文，刘妮娜，伏干，闫国利. 中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(3): 298-303.
[13]	刘志方，刘妮娜，仝文. 字、词的识别加工在中文阅读眼动控制中的作用:来自消失文本方面的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(2): 182-187.
[14]	张巧明, 王爱云, 闫国利. 大学生阅读知觉广度影响因素的回归分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(2): 190-194.
[15]	吴捷；刘志方；刘妮娜. 词频、可预测性及合理性对目标词首次注视位置的影响[J]. , 2011, 9(2): 140-146.