父母心理控制、校园排斥与初中生内化问题的动态关系：交叉滞后研究

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.05.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究基于发展情境理论，采用纵向设计，对河南省某地区578名初中生进行连续3次追踪测查，考察青少年早期内化问题与父母心理控制、校园排斥的相互作用模式。结果发现：(1)父母心理控制与初中生内化问题之间符合相互作用模型；(2)校园排斥与初中生内化问题之间符合相互作用模型；(3)校园排斥在父母心理控制与内化问题之间起纵向中介作用；(4)交叉滞后模型存在性别差异，男生的内化问题更易诱发外部环境的消极反馈，而外部环境对女生内化问题的预测作用更为稳定。

关键词: 父母心理控制, 校园排斥, 内化问题, 交叉滞后模型, 性别差异

Abstract:

Based on the developmental contextualism, 578 middle school students in Henan Province were surveyed by three consecutive times in a longitudinal design to investigate the interaction pattern of early adolescent internalizing problem with parental psychological control and campus exclusion. The results showed that: 1) there was an interaction model between parental psychological control and junior high school students’ internalizing problem; 2) there was an interaction model between campus exclusion and junior high school students’ internalizing problem; 3) campus exclusion played a longitudinal mediating role between parental psychological control and internalizing problem; 4) there were gender differences in the cross-lagged model. The internalizing problem of boys was more likely to induce negative feedback from the external environment, while the external environment was more stable in predicting the internalizing problem of girls.

Key words: parental psychological control, campus exclusion, internalizing problem, cross-lagged model, gender difference

张野, 刘致宏, 申婷, 赵雨露. 父母心理控制、校园排斥与初中生内化问题的动态关系：交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(5): 658-665.

Ye ZHANG, Zhihong LIU, Ting SHEN, Yulu ZHAO. The Dynamic Relationship Between Parental Psychological Control, Campus Exclusion and Junior High School Students’ Internalizing Problem: A Cross-Lagged Analysis[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(5): 658-665.

图/表 4

参考文献 0

	蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 江荣焕, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 家庭功能与中学生校园受欺负的关系: 外倾性、问题行为的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26 (5): 1006- 1010.
	刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的“健康环境悖论”: 敌意性归因的中介作用. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (2): 170- 181.
	汤丹丹, 温忠麟. 共同方法偏差检验: 问题与建议. 心理科学, 2020, 43 (1): 215- 223.
	田菲菲, 田录梅. 亲子关系、朋友关系影响问题行为的3种模型. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22 (6): 968- 976.
	王凯, 张野. 校园排斥对初中生内外化问题的影响: 同伴关系与核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36 (5): 594- 604.
	王润程, 王孟成, 高一点, 蒋雅丽, 张小崔, 姚树桥. Achenbach青少年自评量表(2001年版)中文版的信度和效度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21 (6): 977- 980.
	邢晓沛, 孙晓丽, 王争艳, 邵淑慧. 父母心理控制与儿童自我控制和问题行为: 有中介的调节模型. 心理科学, 2017, 40 (3): 594- 599.
	张珊珊, 郭爽, 张野, 申婷. 校园排斥对初中生攻击行为的影响: 宽恕倾向、积极应对的中介作用及性别的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, 2020, (12): 62- 68, 96.
	张野, 王凯, 刘祖志, 申婷. 父母行为控制、心理控制与高中生消极社会适应的关系: 人际自立和校园排斥的序列中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38 (4): 495- 504.
	张野, 闫平, 温兆欢. 小学生校园排斥: 一项基于教师视角的访谈研究. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 42 (2): 108- 112.
	张野, 苑波, 张珊珊. 青少年学生遭受校园排斥的结构与测量. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 43 (3): 119- 124.
	Allen, J. P. (2008). The attachment system in adolescence. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 419–435). New York: The Guilford Press.
	Barber, B. K., & Harmon, E. L. (2002). Violating the self: Parental psychological control of children and adolescents. In B. K. Barber (Ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents (pp. 15–52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
	Chao, R. K. Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 1994, 65 (4): 1111- 1119. DOI
	Chen, P. P., Zhang, J. H., Li, H. X., & Fu, M. M. Relationships between parenting behaviors and adolescents’ creativity in China: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 2021, 155 (5): 457- 472. DOI
	Christina, S., Magson, N. R., Kakar, V., & Rapee, R. M. The bidirectional relationships between peer victimization and internalizing problems in school-aged children: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 2021, 85, 101979. DOI
	Chung, G. H., Flook, L., & Fuligni, A. J. (2011). Reciprocal associations between family and peer conflict in adolescents’ daily lives. Child Development, 82(5), 1390–1396.
	Chyung, Y. J., Lee, Y. A., Ahn, S. J., & Bang, H. S. Associations of perceived parental psychological control with depression, anxiety in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Marriage & Family Review, 2022, 58 (2): 158- 197.
	Coyne, J. C. Depression and the response of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1976, 85 (2): 186- 193. DOI
	Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113 (3): 487- 496. DOI
	Davies, P. T., & Lindsay, L. L. Interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: Why does gender moderate early adolescent vulnerability. Journal of Family Psychology, 2004, 18 (1): 160- 170. DOI
	Flook, L. Gender differences in adolescents’ daily interpersonal events and well-being. Child Development, 2011, 82 (2): 454- 461. DOI
	Inguglia, C., Ingoglia, S., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., Lo Cricchio, M. G., Musso, P., ... Lim, H. J. Parenting dimensions and internalizing difficulties in Italian and U.S. emerging adults: The intervening role of autonomy and relatedness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2016, 25 (2): 419- 431. DOI
	Jamnik, M. R., & DiLalla, L. F. Health outcomes associated with internalizing problems in early childhood and adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10, 60. DOI
	Kochel, K. P., Ladd, G. W., & Rudolph, K. D. Longitudinal associations among youth depressive symptoms, peer victimization, and low peer acceptance: An interpersonal process perspective. Child Development, 2012, 83 (2): 637- 650. DOI
	Kraines, M. A., White, E. J., Grant, D. M., & Wells, T. T. Social anxiety as a precursor for depression: Influence of interpersonal rejection and attention to emotional stimuli. Psychiatry Research, 2019, 275, 296- 303. DOI
	Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent-child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 3–42). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
	Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
	Liu, Y. L. Paternal/maternal attachment, peer support, social expectations of peer interaction, and depressive symptoms. Adolescence, 2006, 41 (164): 705- 721.
	LoParo, D., Fonseca, A. C., Matos, A. P., & Craighead, W. E. A developmental cascade analysis of peer rejection, depression, anxiety, and externalizing problems from childhood through young adulthood. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 2023, 51 (9): 1303- 1314. DOI
	Modrek, A. S., Hass, R., Kwako, A., & Sandoval, W. A. Do adolescents want more autonomy? Testing gender differences in autonomy across STEM. Journal of Adolescence, 2021, 92 (1): 237- 246. DOI
	Parke, R. D., & Ladd, G. W. (2016). Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage. London: Routledge.
	Raja, S. N., Mcgee, R., & Stanton, W. R. Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1992, 21 (4): 471- 485. DOI
	Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & van Acker, R. Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 2000, 36 (1): 14- 24. DOI
	Sameroff, A. J., & Mackenzie, M. J. Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 2003, 15 (3): 613- 640. DOI
	Schleider, J. L., Vélez, C. E., Krause, E. D., & Gillham, J. Perceived psychological control and anxiety in early adolescents: The mediating role of attributional style. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2014, 38 (1): 71- 81. DOI
	Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development, 2002, 4 (2): 133- 161.
	Shen, Z. J., Xiao, J. L., Su, S. B., Tam, C. C., & Lin, D. H. Reciprocal associations between peer victimization and depressive symptoms among Chinese children and adolescents: Between- and within-person effects. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2023, 15 (3): 938- 956. DOI
	Smetana, J. G., & Rote, W. M. Adolescent-parent relationships: Progress, processes, and prospects. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 2019, 1 (1): 41- 68. DOI
	Spyropoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. The scarring effects of depression symptoms on sadness rumination and peer victimization in Greek early adolescents: Evidence for an integrated symptoms-driven model. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 2022, 42 (7): 845- 884. DOI
	Sullivan, T. N., Farrell, A. D., & Kliewer, W. Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology, 2006, 18 (1): 119- 137.
	Sun, L. P., Liang, L. C., & Bian, Y. F. Parental psychological control and peer victimization among Chinese adolescents: The effect of peer pressure as a mediator. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2017, 26 (12): 3278- 3287. DOI
	Wang, L. F., Feng, Z. Z., Yang, G. Y., Yang, Y. L., Wang, K. F., Dai, Q., … Xia, F. Depressive symptoms among children and adolescents in western China: An epidemiological survey of prevalence and correlates. Psychiatry Research, 2016, 246, 267- 274. DOI
	Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. C. The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 2007, 78 (5): 1592- 1610. DOI
	West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
	Wijsbroek, S. A. M., Hale, W. W., III, Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., & Meeus, W. H. J. The direction of effects between perceived parental behavioral control and psychological control and adolescents’ self-reported GAD and SAD symptoms. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2011, 20 (7): 361- 371.
	Yu, X. X., Fu, X. Y., Yang, Z. X., Zhang, M., Liu, X. L., Fu, Y. F., & Lv, Y. C. Bidirectional relationship between parental psychological control and adolescent maladjustment. Journal of Adolescence, 2021, 92 (1): 75- 85. DOI

	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1.性别
2.父母心理控制T1	2.59±0.75	0.05
3.校园排斥T1	2.22±0.50	0.05	0.34***
4.内化问题T1	1.43±0.36	0.01	0.40***	0.57***
5.父母心理控制T2	2.62±0.80	0.10*	0.58***	0.26***	0.37***
6.校园排斥T2	2.19±0.55	0.11**	0.32***	0.61***	0.53***	0.42***
7.内化问题T2	1.45±0.39	−0.01	0.37***	0.40***	0.63***	0.50***	0.60***
8.父母心理控制T3	2.58±0.80	0.12**	0.51***	0.29***	0.37***	0.68***	0.36***	0.46***
9.校园排斥T3	2.29±0.62	0.05	0.28***	0.59***	0.59***	0.33***	0.65***	0.53***	0.40***
10.内化问题T3	1.41±0.43	−0.07	0.28***	0.42***	0.63***	0.37***	0.51***	0.76***	0.48***	0.67***

	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1.性别
2.父母心理控制T1	2.59±0.75	0.05
3.校园排斥T1	2.22±0.50	0.05	0.34***
4.内化问题T1	1.43±0.36	0.01	0.40***	0.57***
5.父母心理控制T2	2.62±0.80	0.10*	0.58***	0.26***	0.37***
6.校园排斥T2	2.19±0.55	0.11**	0.32***	0.61***	0.53***	0.42***
7.内化问题T2	1.45±0.39	−0.01	0.37***	0.40***	0.63***	0.50***	0.60***
8.父母心理控制T3	2.58±0.80	0.12**	0.51***	0.29***	0.37***	0.68***	0.36***	0.46***
9.校园排斥T3	2.29±0.62	0.05	0.28***	0.59***	0.59***	0.33***	0.65***	0.53***	0.40***
10.内化问题T3	1.41±0.43	−0.07	0.28***	0.42***	0.63***	0.37***	0.51***	0.76***	0.48***	0.67***

[1]	赵新宇, 乔晓光, 邢晓沛. 父母自主支持、10～12岁儿童的同伴关系与执行功能的动态互动关系：一个发展级联模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 55-63.
[2]	李祖儿, 侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 严厉管教的代际传递：父母的互倚及子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 93-99.
[3]	刘仁洁, 夏凌翔, 赵永萍. 大学生网络欺凌受害潜在类别的发展特点及性别因素的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 784-791.
[4]	李文福, 刘燕, 段熙明, 牛四方, 许瑞雪, 慕福芹. 反刍思维量表在不同性别和抑郁症状医学院校新生中的测量等值性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 854-860.
[5]	刘致宏, 张野, 王凯, 许晴. 校园排斥与青少年问题性社交媒体使用的关系：基于潜调节结构方程模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 533-540.
[6]	吴旻, 宋文琦, 鞠佳雯. 父母粗暴养育与儿童睡眠质量的关系：核心自我评价和消极情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 344-351.
[7]	李甜甜, 顾吉有. 父母心理控制与儿童学业焦虑的关系：未来取向和父母学业参与的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 359-366.
[8]	黄亚娟, 董蕊, 杨震, 康凯月, 许欣. 特质正念与专业运动员心理健康：链式中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 273-279.
[9]	刘志军, 陈继为. 父母“低头行为”对青少年网络欺负和受欺负的影响：亲子亲密感和内化问题的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 79-85.
[10]	谭德琴, 谢瑞波, 丁菀, 吴伟, 宋省成, 李伟健. 亲子依恋和师生关系对留守儿童内化问题的影响：同伴依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 339-345.
[11]	邓林园, 杨梦茜, 杨雨萌, 周楠, 李蓓蕾. 父母自主支持、父母心理控制和青少年网络成瘾的关系：一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 190-196.
[12]	岳鹏飞, 胡文丽, 张嘉鑫, 史梦梦. 粗暴养育与中学生学习投入：状态焦虑与性别的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 226-232.
[13]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[14]	郭庆童, 徐铭雪, 许春艳, 刘秀丽. 大学生宿舍人际关系困扰与手机成瘾的关系：序列中介模型及性别差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 650-656.
[15]	赵悦彤, 孙晓娟, 白倩, 张向葵. 空间活动问卷的修订及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(3): 289-296.