亲子依恋与儿童攻击行为：自恋的中介及感觉加工敏感性的调节

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.05.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨自恋在亲子依恋与儿童反应性攻击和主动性攻击间的中介及感觉加工敏感性(sensory processing sensitivity, SPS)的调节作用，采用反应性−主动性攻击问卷、亲子与同伴依恋量表中亲子依恋维度、儿童自恋量表和高敏感儿童量表，对643名9～14岁儿童进行调查。结果显示，隐性自恋中介亲子信任和亲子疏离对两类攻击行为的影响，显性自恋中介亲子沟通和亲子疏离对反应性攻击的影响；高SPS增强了亲子疏离、隐性自恋和反应性攻击的正向关联。研究更全面地揭示了亲子依恋、不同自恋类型和儿童反应性攻击与主动性攻击的关系，揭示了高SPS儿童对反应性攻击的易感性。

关键词: 亲子依恋, 攻击行为, 隐性自恋, 显性自恋, 感觉加工敏感性

Abstract:

This study investigated the mediating role of children’s narcissism in the relations between parent-child attachment and children’s reactive and proactive aggression, as well as the moderating role of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS). A survey was conducted with 643 children aged 9~14 using the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire, the parent attachment subscale of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, the Narcissism Scale for Children, and the Highly Sensitive Child Scale. The results showed that vulnerable narcissism mediated the effects of parent-child trust and parent-child alienation on children’s proactive and reactive aggression, while grandiose narcissism mediated the effects of parent-child communication and parent-child alienation on reactive aggression. Higher SPS enhanced the positive association between vulnerable narcissism and reactive aggression and aggravated the negative impact of parent-child alienation on reactive aggression. The study comprehensively revealed the relations among parent-child attachment, different narcissism types, and children’s reactive and proactive aggression, highlighting the susceptibility of high SPS children to reactive aggression.

Key words: parent-child attachment, aggressive behaviors, vulnerable narcissism, grandiose narcissism, sensory processing sensitivity

张润竹, 马燕, 徐梦思. 亲子依恋与儿童攻击行为：自恋的中介及感觉加工敏感性的调节[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(5): 635-644.

Runzhu ZHANG, Yan MA, Mengsi XU. Parent-Child Attachment and Children’s Aggressive Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Narcissism and the Moderating Role of Sensory Processing Sensitivity[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(5): 635-644.

图/表 8

参考文献 0

	张丽华, 朱贺. 自恋与攻击性关系的元分析. 心理学报, 2021, 53 (11): 1228- 1243.
	张迎黎, 张亚林, 张迎新, 王杰利, 黄存云. 修订版青少年依恋问卷中文版在初中生中应用的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2011, 25 (1): 66- 70.
	张振. 自恋与攻击行为的关系: 观点采择和共情关注的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19 (1): 131- 136.
	周广东, 周广敏. 同伴关系与儿童的反应性和主动性攻击: 交叉滞后分析. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19 (5): 620- 627.
	周浩, 龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 2004, 12 (6): 942- 950.
	Aiken, L. S, & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
	Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53, 27- 51. DOI
	Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1987, 16 (5): 427- 454. DOI
	Aron, E. N., Aron, A., & Jagiellowicz, J. Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2012, 16 (3): 262- 282. DOI
	Booth, C., Standage, H., & Fox, E. Sensory-processing sensitivity moderates the association between childhood experiences and adult life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, 87, 24- 29. DOI
	Chen, Y. M., Liu, K., Zhu, Y., Fang, X. Q., Ding, Y. T., & Jiang, W. J. Parental attachment and mental health in Chinese early adolescents: The mediation role of narcissism. Children and Youth Services Review, 2024, 166, 107966. DOI
	Derry, K. L., Bayliss, D. M., & Ohan, J. L. Measuring grandiose and vulnerable narcissism in children and adolescents: The Narcissism Scale for Children. Assessment, 2019, 26 (4): 645- 660. DOI
	Derry, K. L., Ohan, J. L., & Bayliss, D. M. Fearing failure: Grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and emotional reactivity in children. Child Development, 2020, 91 (3): e581- e596.
	Ebbert, A. M., Infurna, F. J., & Luthar, S. S. Mapping developmental changes in perceived parent-adolescent relationship quality throughout middle school and high school. Development and Psychopathology, 2019, 31 (4): 1541- 1556. DOI
	Evans, S. C., Dίaz, K. I., Callahan, K. P., Wolock, E. R., & Fite, P. J. Parallel trajectories of proactive and reactive aggression in middle childhood and their outcomes in early adolescence. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 2021, 49 (2): 211- 226. DOI
	Graham, J. W. Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 2009, 60, 549- 576. DOI
	Groh, A. M., Fearon, R. M. P., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Roisman, G. I. Attachment in the early life course: Meta-analytic evidence for its role in socioemotional development. Child Development Perspectives, 2017, 11 (1): 70- 76. DOI
	Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 2010, 78 (1): 95- 118. DOI
	Jauk, E., Knödler, M., Frenzel, J., & Kanske, P. Do highly sensitive persons display hypersensitive narcissism? Similarities and differences in the nomological networks of sensory processing sensitivity and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2023, 79 (1): 228- 254. DOI
	Kjærvik, S. L., & Bushman, B. J. The link between narcissism and aggression: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 2021, 147 (5): 477- 503. DOI
	Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4th ed). New York: The Guilford Press.
	Krizan, Z., & Herlache, A. D. The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2018, 22 (1): 3- 31. DOI
	Li, Q. Q., Gao, M., Deng, Y. F., Zhou, Z. K., & Wang, J. Parental attachment and proactive-reactive aggression in adolescence: The mediating role of self-control and perspective taking. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2023, 16, 3437- 3446. DOI
	Li, Z., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Jones-Gordils, H. R., & Davies, P. T. Sensory processing sensitivity behavior moderates the association between environmental harshness, unpredictability, and child socioemotional functioning. Development and Psychopathology, 2022, 34 (2): 675- 688. DOI
	Liss, M., Timmel, L., Baxley, K., & Killingsworth, P. Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety, and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 39 (8): 1429- 1439. DOI
	Liu, Q. X., Huang, J. J., & Zhou, Z. K. Self-expansion via smartphone and smartphone addiction tendency among adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020, 119, 105590. DOI
	Marcus, R. F., & Kramer, C. Reactive and proactive aggression: Attachment and social competence predictors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2001, 162 (3): 260- 275. DOI
	Meter, D. J., Ehrenreich, S. E., Beron, K., & Underwood, M. K. Listening in: How parent-child communication relates to social and physical aggression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2021, 30 (6): 1540- 1553. DOI
	Meyer, B., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2011). Attachment theory and narcissistic personality disorder. In W. K. Campbell & J. D. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments (pp. 434–444). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
	Miller, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. Comparing clinical and social-personality conceptualizations of narcissism. Journal of Personality, 2008, 76 (3): 449- 476.
	Savage, J. The association between attachment, parental bonds and physically aggressive and violent behavior: A comprehensive review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2014, 19 (2): 164- 178. DOI
	Slagt, M., Dubas, J. S., van Aken, M. A. G., Ellis, B. J., & Deković, M. Sensory processing sensitivity as a marker of differential susceptibility to parenting. Developmental Psychology, 2018, 54 (3): 543- 558. DOI
	Tackett, J. L., Herzhoff, K., Smack, A. J., Reardon, K. W., & Adam, E. K. Does socioeconomic status mediate racial differences in the cortisol response in middle childhood. Health Psychology, 2017, 36 (7): 662- 672. DOI
	van Den Boogert, F., Sizoo, B., Spaan, P., Tolstra, S., Bouman, Y. H. A., Hoogendijk, W. J. G., & Roza, S. J. Sensory processing and aggressive behavior in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Brain Sciences, 2021, 11 (1): 95. DOI
	van Schie, C. C., Jarman, H. L., Huxley, E., & Grenyer, B. F. S. Narcissistic traits in young people: Understanding the role of parenting and maltreatment. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 2020, 7, 10. DOI
	Wink P. Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61 (4): 590- 597. DOI

	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. 性别
2. 年龄	10.83±0.70	0.06
3. SES	0.00±2.52	0.04	0.02
4. 反应性攻击	7.54±2.66	0.06	0.06	0.07
5. 主动性攻击	4.54±2.69	0.09*	−0.01	−0.05	0.47***
6. 亲子信任	37.07±9.45	0.06	0.06	0.18***	−0.14**	−0.37***
7. 亲子沟通	32.71±8.77	0.09*	0.04	0.20***	−0.12**	−0.32***	0.88***
8. 亲子疏离	13.29±4.85	0.01	0.02	−0.04	0.20***	0.23***	−0.24***	−0.25***
9. 隐性自恋	1.97±0.71	−0.02	−0.002	0.02	0.36***	0.30***	−0.34***	−0.28***	0.33***
10. 显性自恋	2.38±0.67	0.03	0.08	0.16***	0.22***	0.07	0.11*	0.15***	0.05	0.47***
11. 感觉加工敏感性	57.22±13.72	−0.04	0.07	0.14***	0.16***	−0.23***	0.20***	0.17***	−0.003	0.10*	0.08

	M±SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. 性别
2. 年龄	10.83±0.70	0.06
3. SES	0.00±2.52	0.04	0.02
4. 反应性攻击	7.54±2.66	0.06	0.06	0.07
5. 主动性攻击	4.54±2.69	0.09*	−0.01	−0.05	0.47***
6. 亲子信任	37.07±9.45	0.06	0.06	0.18***	−0.14**	−0.37***
7. 亲子沟通	32.71±8.77	0.09*	0.04	0.20***	−0.12**	−0.32***	0.88***
8. 亲子疏离	13.29±4.85	0.01	0.02	−0.04	0.20***	0.23***	−0.24***	−0.25***
9. 隐性自恋	1.97±0.71	−0.02	−0.002	0.02	0.36***	0.30***	−0.34***	−0.28***	0.33***
10. 显性自恋	2.38±0.67	0.03	0.08	0.16***	0.22***	0.07	0.11*	0.15***	0.05	0.47***
11. 感觉加工敏感性	57.22±13.72	−0.04	0.07	0.14***	0.16***	−0.23***	0.20***	0.17***	−0.003	0.10*	0.08

中介路径	中介效应	95%CI下限	95%CI上限
亲子信任→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	−0.13***	−0.19	−0.07
亲子沟通→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	0.05	−0.01	0.10
亲子疏离→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	0.09***	0.06	0.13
亲子信任→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	−0.06**	−0.11	−0.02
亲子沟通→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	0.02	−0.01	0.05
亲子疏离→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	0.05**	0.02	0.07
亲子信任→显性自恋→反应性攻击	−0.02	−0.06	0.01
亲子沟通→显性自恋→反应性攻击	0.05*	0.01	0.10
亲子疏离→显性自恋→反应性攻击	0.02*	0.002	0.04
亲子信任→显性自恋→主动性攻击	−0.01	−0.03	0.01
亲子沟通→显性自恋→主动性攻击	0.03	−0.002	0.05
亲子疏离→显性自恋→主动性攻击	0.01	−0.002	0.02

中介路径	中介效应	95%CI下限	95%CI上限
亲子信任→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	−0.13***	−0.19	−0.07
亲子沟通→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	0.05	−0.01	0.10
亲子疏离→隐性自恋→反应性攻击	0.09***	0.06	0.13
亲子信任→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	−0.06**	−0.11	−0.02
亲子沟通→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	0.02	−0.01	0.05
亲子疏离→隐性自恋→主动性攻击	0.05**	0.02	0.07
亲子信任→显性自恋→反应性攻击	−0.02	−0.06	0.01
亲子沟通→显性自恋→反应性攻击	0.05*	0.01	0.10
亲子疏离→显性自恋→反应性攻击	0.02*	0.002	0.04
亲子信任→显性自恋→主动性攻击	−0.01	−0.03	0.01
亲子沟通→显性自恋→主动性攻击	0.03	−0.002	0.05
亲子疏离→显性自恋→主动性攻击	0.01	−0.002	0.02

[1]	曾萱萱, 余俐珍, 王小桃. 父母自恋与幼儿身体攻击行为的关系：父母身体攻击行为和子女教育心理控制源的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(4): 513-519.
[2]	刘洁, 崔维维, 王澍. 人格和攻击行为：对近20年学生群体的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(2): 168-176.
[3]	张丽华, 杨博, 刘欣. 社会排斥对不同类型自恋者敌意解释偏向的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(2): 257-264.
[4]	罗鹤旋, 朱海东, 邱鑫. 家庭社会经济地位与青少年亲社会行为的关系：链式中介效应及独生状况差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(1): 130-137.
[5]	孙姗, 陈翩, 杨阳, 黄奥迪, 王美萍. 父母冲突与青少年早期攻击行为：情绪不安全感和自我控制的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(6): 784-790.
[6]	闫佳慈, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年孤独感：亲子沟通的中介作用和亲子依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(6): 806-813.
[7]	马跃, 吴捷, 查世琦, 杨春. 青少年人际困扰的核心症状及其与亲子依恋和心理边界的网络关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(4): 478-485.
[8]	邹孟芮, 刘舒野, 程诚, 王友碧. 心理虐待与青少年攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 282-288.
[9]	吴明证, 陈迪, 严梦瑶, 倪苏杭, 王士祺, 尹金荣, 孙晓玲. 家庭仪式与青少年自我控制的关系：亲子依恋与生命意义感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 832-838.
[10]	高阳, 倪士光, 夏志远, 田午林. 群体夸耀方式对旁观者网络攻击行为的影响：旁观者的被挑衅感和群体认同的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 471-478.
[11]	李娇娇, 刘晓冰, 裴丹丹, 徐碧波, 尹锡杨. 情绪智力对大学生恶意创造力的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 563-569.
[12]	谭德琴, 谢瑞波, 丁菀, 吴伟, 宋省成, 李伟健. 亲子依恋和师生关系对留守儿童内化问题的影响：同伴依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 339-345.
[13]	丁倩, 罗星雨. 歧视知觉对留守青少年攻击行为的影响：多重中介效应分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 346-352.
[14]	李晓玫, 姜英杰, 于明阳, 袁媛, 刘芳芳. 留守儿童心理虐待与攻击行为：心理弹性和人际敏感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 353-360.
[15]	曾思瑶, 王振宏. 中文版父母报告高敏感儿童量表的修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 101-107.