心理虐待与青少年攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.02.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本研究基于一般攻击模型，探究心理虐待与攻击行为的关系，检验执行功能的中介作用与情绪调节自我效能感的调节作用。采用儿童心理虐待量表、青少年攻击行为问卷、青少年执行功能量表和情绪调节自我效能感量表，对710名12～18岁青少年进行调查。结果显示：(1)心理虐待、攻击行为与执行功能之间均存在较强的正相关，而情绪调节自我效能感则与执行功能、心理虐待、攻击行为呈中等程度的负相关。(2)执行功能在心理虐待与攻击行为之间的中介作用显著。(3)情绪调节自我效能感在执行功能与攻击行为间起调节作用。结果表明，心理虐待可能会损伤青少年的执行功能从而增加攻击行为的发生概率，而当情绪调节自我效能感水平较高时能够缓和执行功能损伤带来的攻击行为增加问题。

关键词: 心理虐待, 攻击行为, 执行功能, 情绪调节自我效能感, 青少年

Abstract:

The present study aimed to examine the relationship between psychological maltreatment and aggressive behavior in adolescents based on the General Aggression Model (GAM). In addition, it sought to investigate the role of executive function as a mediator and regulatory emotional self-efficacy as a moderator. A total of 710 adolescents aged 12 to 18 participated in this study and completed various measures, including Childhood Psychological Maltreatment Questionnaire, Adolescent Aggressive Behavior Questionnaire, Adolescent Executive Function Scale, and Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy Scale. The results were as follows: 1) There were strong positive associations between psychological maltreatment, aggressive behavior, and executive function, while regulatory emotional self-efficacy showed a negative correlation with psychological maltreatment, aggressive behavior, and executive function. 2) Executive function had a significant mediating effect in the relationship between psychological maltreatment and aggressive behavior. 3) Regulatory emotional self-efficacy acted as a moderator in the association between executive function and aggressive behavior.

Key words: psychological maltreatment, aggressive behavior, executive function, regulatory emotional self-efficacy, adolescent

邹孟芮, 刘舒野, 程诚, 王友碧. 心理虐待与青少年攻击行为的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 282-288.

Mengrui ZOU, Shuye LIU, Cheng CHENG, Youbi WANG. The Relationship Between Psychological Maltreatment and Adolescents’ Aggressive Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(2): 282-288.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	陈哲, 付丽, 彭咏梅, 蔡蓉, 周世杰. 父母教养方式、儿童期虐待、依恋与反社会人格障碍倾向的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19 (2): 212- 214.
	邓玉凤, 康杰. 基于典型相关分析的青少年自我中心与攻击行为关系研究. 预防青少年犯罪研究, 2023, (6): 30- 36. DOI
	龚钰涵, 叶莹莹, 周宵. 青少年虐待与忽视对抑郁的影响: 自尊和自我表露的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40 (6): 886- 893.
	郭斯萍, 张晓冰. 班杜拉的社会学习理论再评价——从文化心理学角度. 心理研究, 2022, 15 (2): 99- 104.
	何明星, 李春, 赵茂. 非正态总体均值区间估计方法的模拟比较. 科技信息, 2009, (35): 971- 972. DOI
	黄春晖, 唐义诚, 王利刚, 谢东杰, 樊春雷, 高文斌. 青少年执行功能量表的编制. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 2014, 23 (5): 463- 465. DOI
	纪林芹, 张文新. 儿童攻击发展研究的新进展. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23 (2): 122- 127. DOI
	李菁菁, 窦凯, 聂衍刚. 亲子依恋与青少年外化问题行为: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26 (6): 1168- 1172.
	李晓玫, 姜英杰, 于明阳, 袁媛刘芳芳. 留守儿童心理虐待与攻击行为: 心理弹性和人际敏感的链式中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20 (3): 353- 360. DOI
	李雪, 谢琴红, 寇慧, 杨波. 违法青少年童年期虐待对攻击性的影响: 链式中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30 (3): 688- 692.
	刘俊升, 周颖, 顾文瑜. Buss-Perry攻击性量表在青少年中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17 (4): 449- 451.
	刘小英, 胡昌生. 儿童期虐待与高中生攻击行为: 执行功能的关系. 心理学进展, 2023, 13 (5): 1889- 1900.
	马志璇, 王明怡. 儿童期虐待对执行功能的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (5): 796- 800.
	潘辰, 邓云龙, 管冰清, 罗学荣. 儿童心理虐待量表的修订和信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2010, 18 (4): 463- 465.
	孙丽君, 衡书鹏, 牛更枫, 李俊一, 杜红芹, 胡祥恩. 儿童期心理虐待对青少年攻击行为的影响: 安全感与孤独感的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25 (5): 902- 906.
	汤冬玲, 董妍, 俞国良, 文书锋. 情绪调节自我效能感: 一个新的研究主题. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18 (4): 598- 604.
	王玉洁, 窦凯, 刘毅. 情绪调节自我效能感量表的修订. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2013, 12 (1): 45- 50.
	温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 2014, 46 (5): 714- 726.
	吴晓薇, 黄玲, 何晓琴, 唐海波, 蒲唯丹. 大学生社交焦虑与攻击、抑郁: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23 (5): 804- 807.
	于腾旭, 刘文, 刘方, 车翰博. 心理虐待对8~12岁儿童攻击行为的影响: 认知重评的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (2): 282- 286.
	张建人, 孟凡斐, 凌辉, 龚文婷, 李家鑫. 童年期虐待、父母教养方式、不安全依恋与大学生反社会人格障碍的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2021, 29 (1): 28- 32.
	周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942–950.
	周玫, 周晓林. 儿童执行功能与情绪调节. 心理与行为研究, 2003, 1 (3): 194- 199.
	朱文凤, 夏凌翔. (2019). 儿童虐待与攻击: 敌意归因偏向和愤怒沉浸的中介作用. 第二十二届全国心理学学术会议, 杭州.
	Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002, 53 (1): 27- 51. DOI
	Andreas, J. B., & Watson, M. W. Moderating effects of family environment on the association between children’s aggressive beliefs and their aggression trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 2009, 21 (1): 189- 205. DOI
	Arslan, G. Psychological maltreatment, coping strategies, and mental health problems: A brief and effective measure of psychological maltreatment in adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2017, 68, 96- 106.
	Bandura, A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 1978, 33 (4): 344- 358. DOI
	Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
	Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior. (Vol. 4, pp. 436−443). New York: Academic Press.
	Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 2003, 74 (3): 769- 782. DOI
	Caprara, G. V., Di Giunta, L., Eisenberg, N., Gerbino, M., Pastorelli, C., & Tramontano, C. Assessing regulatory emotional self-efficacy in three countries. Psychological Assessment, 2008, 20 (3): 227- 237. DOI
	Cicchetti, D. Socioemotional, personality, and biological development: Illustrations from a multilevel developmental psychopathology perspective on child maltreatment. Annual Review of Psychology, 2016, 67 (1): 187- 211. DOI
	Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 2013, 64, 135- 168. DOI
	Fagan, A. A. Child maltreatment and aggressive behaviors in early adolescence: Evidence of moderation by parent/child relationship quality. Child Maltreatment, 2020, 25 (2): 182- 191. DOI
	Frazier, P., Keenan, N., Anders, S., Perera, S., Shallcross, S., & Hintz, S. Perceived past, present, and future control and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 100 (4): 749- 765. DOI
	Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., Kramer, J. H., Miller, B. L., & Levenson, R. W. Executive functions and the down-regulation and up-regulation of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 2012, 26 (1): 103- 118. DOI
	Hayes, A. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2013, 51 (3): 335- 337.
	Hoaken, P. N. S., Shaughnessy, V. K., & Pihl, R. O. Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: Is it an issue of impulsivity. Aggressive Behavior, 2003, 29 (1): 15- 30. DOI
	Kairys, S. W., Johnson, C. F., & Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. The psychological maltreatment of children-technical report. Pediatrics, 2002, 109 (4): e68. DOI
	Kawabata, Y., Tseng, W. L., Murray-Close, D., & Crick, N. R. Developmental trajectories of Chinese children’s relational and physical aggression: Associations with social-psychological adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2012, 40 (7): 1087- 1097. DOI
	Krämer, U. M., Kopyciok, R. P. J., Richter, S., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. The role of executive functions in the control of aggressive behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 2011, 2, 152.
	Lake, S., Wood, E., Dong, H. R., Dobrer, S., Montaner, J., & Kerr, T. The impact of childhood emotional abuse on violence among people who inject drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review, 2015, 34 (1): 4- 9. DOI
	Orkibi, H., & Ronen, T. A dual-pathway model linking self-control skills to aggression in adolescents: Happiness and time perspective as mediators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2019, 20 (3): 729- 742. DOI
	Paschall, M. J., & Fishbein, D. H. Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: A public health perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2002, 7 (3): 215- 235. DOI
	Pechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D. A. Effects of early life stress on cognitive and affective function: An integrated review of human literature. Psychopharmacology, 2011, 214 (1): 55- 70. DOI
	Robbins, T. W. Dissociating executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 1996, 351 (1346): 1463- 1470. DOI
	Romeo, R. D. The teenage brain: The stress response and the adolescent brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2013, 22 (2): 140- 145. DOI
	Sheridan, M. A., Peverill, M., Finn, A. S., & McLaughlin, K. A. Dimensions of childhood adversity have distinct associations with neural systems underlying executive functioning. Development and Psychopathology, 2017, 29 (5): 1777- 1794. DOI
	Shulman, E. P., Harden, K. P., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. Sex differences in the developmental trajectories of impulse control and sensation-seeking from early adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2015, 44 (1): 1- 17. DOI
	Silvers, J. A., McRae, K., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Gross, J. J., Remy, K. A., & Ochsner, K. N. Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence. Emotion, 2012, 12 (6): 1235- 1247. DOI
	Vahl, P., Colins, O. F., Lodewijks, H. P. B., Lindauer, R., Markus, M. T., Doreleijers, T. A. H., & Vermeiren, R. R. Psychopathic traits and maltreatment: Relations with aggression and mental health problems in detained boys. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2016, 46, 129- 136. DOI
	van Rest, M. M., Matthys, W., van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., De Moor, M. H. M., Vriens, A., & Schuengel, C. Social information processing skills link executive functions to aggression in adolescents with mild to borderline intellectual disability. Child Neuropsychology, 2019, 25 (5): 573- 598. DOI
	van Wert, M., Mishna, F., Trocmé, N., & Fallon, B. Which maltreated children are at greatest risk of aggressive and criminal behavior? An examination of maltreatment dimensions and cumulative risk. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2017, 69, 49- 61.
	Zelazo, P. D., & Müller, U. (2011). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In U. Goswami (Ed.). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 574–603). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

变量	M±SD	1	2	3
1.心理虐待	13.51±11.64
2.攻击行为	40.65±14.59	0.51***
3.执行功能	32.07±7.74	0.40***	0.69***
4.情绪调节自我效能感	60.78±13.63	−0.22***	−0.33***	−0.28***

变量	M±SD	1	2	3
1.心理虐待	13.51±11.64
2.攻击行为	40.65±14.59	0.51***
3.执行功能	32.07±7.74	0.40***	0.69***
4.情绪调节自我效能感	60.78±13.63	−0.22***	−0.33***	−0.28***

中介变量	效应	效应值	95%CI
执行功能	总效应	0.51***	[0.48, 0.58]
	直接效应	0.28***	[0.23, 0.34]
	间接效应	0.23***	[0.18, 0.28]

中介变量	效应	效应值	95%CI
执行功能	总效应	0.51***	[0.48, 0.58]
	直接效应	0.28***	[0.23, 0.34]
	间接效应	0.23***	[0.18, 0.28]

	方程1：攻击行为(Y)			方程2：执行功能(Me)			方程3：攻击行为(Y)
	β	SE	t	β	SE	t	β	SE	t
心理虐待	0.45	0.03	13.63***	0.34	0.04	9.54***	0.27	0.03	9.58***
情绪调节自我效能感	−0.22	0.03	−7.00***	−0.22	0.04	−6.09***	−0.16	0.03	−5.34***
心理虐待×情绪调节自我效能感	−0.05	0.03	−1.36	−0.04	0.04	−1.11	0.03	0.03	1.09
执行功能							0.53	0.03	18.66***
执行功能×情绪调节自我效能感							−0.11	0.03	−3.86***
R²		0.31			0.20			0.57
F		107.80***			59.30***			183.20***