不同年龄群体大五人格与幸福感关系*

心理与行为研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 633-638.

不同年龄群体大五人格与幸福感关系^*

陈志霞，李启明

华中科技大学公共管理学院,武汉 430074
西南交通大学心理研究与资询中心,成都 611756

收稿日期:2013-06-05 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-12-19
通讯作者: 李启明,男,西南交通大学心理研究与咨询中心讲师,博士。qmdrli@hust.edu.cn。
作者简介:陈志霞,女,华中科技大学公共管理学院教授,博士生导师。
基金资助:
本研究得到国家社科基金(09BSH045)和中央高校基本科研业务费(HUST2013WT007)的资助。

The Relation between Big Five Traits and Well-being across the Life Span

Chen Zhixia¹, Li Qiming²

1 College of Public Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074;
2 Psychological Reseach and Counseling Center, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756

Received:2013-06-05 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-12-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以毕生发展为研究视角,调查了3192位不同年龄群体被试,探讨不同年龄群体大五人格与幸福感的关系。结果发现:(1)各变量都存在显著的年龄效应,大五人格与主观幸福感相关显著；(2)在不同年龄群体里,神经质和开放性都能显著预测主观幸福感,且预测值随着年龄而增大,而外倾性、尽责性和宜人性对主观幸福感的预测存在年龄差异；(3)大五人格对主观幸福感的解释率随着年龄的增长而下降,到60岁之后其解释率上升；(4)年龄在大五人格与主观幸福感之间起了显著的调节作用。

关键词: 大五人格, 主观幸福感, 年龄, 毕生发展

Abstract: In the current study, we examine the relationship between personality traits and subjective well-being and psychological well-being from a life span perspective. A total of 3192 Chinese residents took part in this study from 41 cities in the country 17 provinces and municipalities. And they completed the subjective well-being scale and big five-factor inventory. It took about 20 minutes to complete the questionnaires. The correlations among factors were calculated with SPSS 16.0 and Structural equation model was applied to deal with all data. In the analysis of structural equation modeling, seven models were constructed. As predicted, personality traits were significantly associated with subjective well-being with the different age groups of Chinese residents. And then Structural equation models revealed that ages play a moderating role between personality traits and subjective well-being, and the total effect value was different. In conclusion, this research indicates that personality traits were associated with greater happiness across the life span, and personality traits were one of the best predictors. This study provides new insights into personal traits as predictors of well-being. Especially, this study addressed some limitations of previous studies. Importantly, this study also helps clarify questions about relationships between subjective well-being and personal traits from a life span perspective. These findings provide an important step in the understanding relationships between subjective well-being and personal traits, these results also provides some empirical evidences sinicization research and cross-cultural comparison.

Key words: big five traits, subjective well-being, age, life-long development

中图分类号:

B8481

陈志霞，李启明. 不同年龄群体大五人格与幸福感关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 633-638.

Chen Zhixia, Li Qiming. The Relation between Big Five Traits and Well-being across the Life Span[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2014, 12(5): 633-638.

参考文献

陈灿锐, 高艳红, 申荷永. (2012). 主观幸福感与大三人格特征相关研究的元分析. 心理科学进展, (1), 19-26.
张兴贵, 郑雪. (2005). 青少年学生大五人格与主观幸福感的关系研究. 心理发展与教育, (2), 98-103.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. et al. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. (pp. 565-571). New York: Publications Russell Sage Foundation.
Chico-Libran, E. (2006). Personality dimensions and subjective well-being. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9, 38-44.
Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2009). The development of personality across the life span. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 191-204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., & Goebel, J., et al. (2010). Where people live and die makes a difference: Individual and geographic disparities in well-being progression at the end of life. Psychology and Aging; Psychology and Aging, 25, 661-676.
Gomez, V., Krings, F., Bangerter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 345-354.
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A Motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32-60.
Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B., Blonigen, D. M., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Burt, S. G. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on personality trait stability and growth during the transition to adulthood: A three wave longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 545-556.
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the Integrative Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being - Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75-79.
Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. ( 2009 ). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 75-102). New York: Springer.
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Personality development across the life span: Longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101, 847-861.
Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1039-1056.
Luo, L. (1998). The meaning, measure, and correlates of happiness among Chinese people. Proceeding of the national science council part C: Humanities and social sciences, 8, 115-137.
Fiori, K. L., Smith, J., & Antonucci, T. C. (2007). Social network types among older adults: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 62, 322-330.
Freund, A. M., & Riediger, M. (2006). Goals as building blocks of personality and development in adulthood. In D. K. Mroczek & T. D.NLittle (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 353-372). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Orth, U., Robins, R. W., & Soto, C. J. (2010). Tracking the Trajectory of Shame, Guilt, and Pride Across the Life Span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1061-1071.
Rocke, C., & Lachman, M. E. (2008). Perceived trajectories of life satisfaction across past, present, and future: Profiles and correlates of subjective change in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 833-847.
Richard, E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research Series, 37, 75-102.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Jonas. (2008). Refining the Relationship Between Personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138-161.
Stones, M., Kozma, A., McNeil, K., & Worobetz, S. (2011). Subjective well-being in later life: 20 years after the butterworths monograph series on individual and population aging. Canadian Journal on Aging/Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 30, 467-477.
Vitterso, J., & Nilsen, F. (2002). The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: Once again, neuroticism is the important predictor of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 57, 89-118.

[1]	程刚, 邹燕, 余玮, 丁芳媛, 贾云丞. 入学过渡期高中新生大五人格与主观社会地位变化轨迹的关系：基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 692-699.
[2]	李启明, 王纪婷. 家庭氛围、子女生活满意度与心理健康代际传递的关系：亲子性别和子女年龄的差异[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 282-288.
[3]	朱海, 宋香, 周云, 杨晓平, 田泽永. 职业压力对西部山区中小学教师主观幸福感的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 115-121.
[4]	高峰, 白学军. 越努力越幸福—中国背景下成就动机与主观幸福感的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 466-472.
[5]	曾练平, 田丹丹, 黄亚夫, 赵守盈. 中小学教师人格类型及其对工作家庭平衡与工作绩效关系的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 280-286.
[6]	魏玲, 余宥依, 刘人豪, 程一智. 场景的年龄特征会影响自闭症谱系障碍儿童的注视模式[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 679-685.
[7]	李昌竹, 郑士春, 陆梭, 张雨青, 刘正奎. 心率变异性与人格的神经质之间关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 275-280.
[8]	王江洋, 肖青, 聂家昕, 高亚华. 孤儿小学生主观幸福感的积极心理教育干预[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 634-643.
[9]	郭春涵. 大学生自我中心与主观幸福感的关系：自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 546-552.
[10]	申正付, 韩布新, 杨秀木, 古继宝. 全科医生胜任力和主观幸福感：工作绩效的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(2): 282-288.
[11]	缪佩君, 谢姗姗, 陈则飞, 连榕. 幼儿教师心理弹性与职业倦怠的关系：大五人格的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(4): 512-517.
[12]	姜晓文, 姜媛, 田丽, 方平. 青少年压力与主观幸福感的关系：一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 349-354.
[13]	刘丹, 张建新, 张明妍. 纪检干部腐败容忍度与其组织忠诚的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(1): 130-138.
[14]	冯永辉, 彭运石. 青少年压力与吸烟行为的关系：人格与性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(5): 697-701.
[15]	武盼盼1,邵景进, 贺念, 张丽. 老年人年龄认同特征及其与心理健康的关系^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(4): 520-527.