习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.002

心理与行为研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 297-304.DOI: 10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.002

习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响

巫金根^1,2, 郭梅华^1,3, 于棋¹, 王冰然¹, 程小云⁴, 闫国利¹

1. 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津师范大学心理学部，学生心理发展与学习天津市高校社会科学实验室，天津 300387;
2. 阳光学院艺术与儿童教育学院，福州 350015;
3. 闽南师范大学教育与心理学院，漳州 363000;
4. 天津市河西区天津小学，天津 300222

收稿日期:2023-08-07 出版日期:2024-05-20 发布日期:2024-05-20
通讯作者: 闫国利，E-mail：psyygl@163.com
基金资助:
2022年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(22JJD190012)。

The Effects of Age of Acquisition and Cumulative Frequency on the Recognition of Visual Characters in Children

WU Jingen^1,2, GUO Meihua^1,3, YU Qi¹, WANG Bingran¹, CHENG Xiaoyun⁴, YAN Guoli¹

1. Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Social Science Laboratory of Students’ Mental Development and Learning, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
2. School of Arts and Child Education, Yango University 350015;
3. School of Education and Psychology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000;
4. Tianjin Primary School of Hexi District, Tianjin 300222

Received:2023-08-07 Online:2024-05-20 Published:2024-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考察五年级小学生在三项汉字识别任务中识别习得早-高频字、习得早-低频字、习得中-低频字和习得晚-低频字的习得年龄效应与累计频率效应。结果发现：(1)语音范畴判断任务和汉字命名任务存在习得年龄效应，ln(习得时长)能预测这两项任务的反应时；(2)语义范畴判断任务和汉字命名任务存在累计频率效应，ln(频率值)能预测这两项任务的反应时。研究结果支持语音完整性假设和网络可塑性假设，不支持累计频率假设和语义假设。

关键词: 习得年龄, 累计频率, 儿童, 汉字识别

Abstract: To investigate the role of age of acquisition (AoA) and cumulative frequency in children’s visual character recognition, four types of characters (early AoA - high frequency, early AoA - low frequency, medium AoA - low frequency, and late AoA - low frequency) were designed, and three types of tasks were conducted in the present study to explore the effects of AoA and cumulative frequency. The results showed that the cumulative frequency effects were present in both the semantic classification task and the immediate naming task, and the AoA effects were present in both the phonetic classification task and the immediate naming task. The regression analysis confirmed that the log-transformed reaction time of recognizing characters in the semantic classification task and the immediate naming task were both predicted by the ln(cumulative frequency), while the reaction time of recognizing characters in the phonetic classification task and the immediate naming task were both predicted by the ln(time known). The above results consistently indicate that the phonological completeness hypothesis and the network plasticity hypothesis, but not the semantic hypothesis and the cumulative frequency hypothesis, can account for AoA and cumulative frequency effects in children’s visual character recognition.

Key words: age of acquisition, cumulative frequency, children, character recognition

中图分类号:

B842

巫金根, 郭梅华, 于棋, 王冰然, 程小云, 闫国利. 习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 297-304.

WU Jingen, GUO Meihua, YU Qi, WANG Bingran, CHENG Xiaoyun, YAN Guoli. The Effects of Age of Acquisition and Cumulative Frequency on the Recognition of Visual Characters in Children[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 297-304.

参考文献

陈宝国, 彭聃龄. (2001). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(Ⅰ). 心理学报, 33(1), 1–6.
陈宝国, 王立新, 彭聃龄. (2003). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(Ⅱ). 心理学报, 35(5), 576–581.
陈宝国, 王立新, 王璐璐, 彭聃龄. (2004). 词汇习得年龄和频率对词汇识别的影响. 心理科学, 27(5), 1060–1064.
陈宝国, 尤文平, 王立新. (2006). 词汇习得年龄效应的研究进展. 心理科学, 29(6), 1515–1517, 1495.
陈宝国, 尤文平, 张亚峰, 刘文焕. (2010). 汉字早期字形加工阶段的习得年龄效应. 心理科学, 33(3), 726–728.
陈宝国, 尤文平, 周会霞. (2007). 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应: 语义假设的证据. 心理学报, 39(1), 9–17.
陈俊, 林少惠, 张积家. (2011). 潮汕话-普通话双言者的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 43(2), 111–122.
李利平, 伍新春, 封安生, 陈芸. (2019). 学龄儿童早期汉语默读流畅的发展轨迹及影响因素. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 627–633.
娄昊, 李丛, 张清芳. (2019). 习得年龄对客体和动作图画口语命名的不同影响: ERP研究. 心理学报, 51(2), 143–153.
温红博, 唐文君, 刘先伟. (2016). 识字能力的单维性检验研究. 心理发展与教育, 32(1), 73–80.
张积家, 陈穗清, 张广岩, 戴东红. (2012). 聋大学生的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 44(11), 1421–1433.
张振军, 丁国盛, 陈宝国. (2011). 汉字习得的年龄效应: 语音完整性假设的检验. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 577–583.
Anwyl-Irvine, A., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2021). Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices. Behavior Research Methods, 53(4), 1407–1425.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved July 3, 2023, from http://www.praat.org/
Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 456–476.
Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 15(3), 208–216.
Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920960351.
Brysbaert, M., Wijnendaele, I. V., & Deyne, S. D. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104(2), 215–226.
Cai, Z. G., Huang, S. T., Xu, Z. B., & Zhao, N. (2022). Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 311–323.
Chang, Y. N., & Lee, C. Y. (2020). Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(6), 1317–1324.
Chen, B. G., Dent, K., You, W. P., & Wu, G. L. (2009). Age of acquisition affects early orthographic processing during Chinese character recognition. Acta Psychologica, 130(3), 196–203.
Chen, B. G., Zhou, H. X., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98(3), 499–516.
Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1103–1123.
Elsherif, M. M., Preece, E., & Catling, J. C. (2023). Age-of-acquisition effects: A literature review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(5), 812–847.
Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 267–283.
Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67.
Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 684–712.
Lété, B., & Bonin, P. (2013). Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 973–1000.
Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S., & Ellis, H. D. (2001). Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: Are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? Cognition, 78(2), 189–205.
Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H. Y., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 287–307.
Menenti, L., & Burani, C. (2007). What causes the effect of age of acquisition in lexical processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 652–660.
Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 116–133.
Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 167–180.
Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 435–459.
Pérez, M. A. (2007). Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 32–42.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Smith, P. T., Turner, J. E., Brown, P. A., & Henry, L. A. (2006). The distinct contributions of age of acquisition and word frequency in auditory word perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(12), 2121–2134.
Terzopoulos, A. R., Duncan, L. G., Wilson, M. A. J., Niolaki, G. Z., & Masterson, J. (2017). HelexKids: A word frequency database for Greek and Cypriot primary school children. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 83–96.
You, W. P., Chen, B. G., & Dunlap, S. (2009). Frequency trajectory effects in Chinese character recognition: Evidence for the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. Cognition, 110(1), 39–50.
Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 32(1), 31–38.

[1]	徐慧艳, 王小英. 3～6岁儿童同胞关系的异质性及其影响因素：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 346-353.
[2]	周玉兰, 王云峰, 宋战兵, 楼佳颖, 李锐. 运动能力与留守儿童问题行为的关系：身体活动和久坐行为的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 372-378.
[3]	郭鑫, 刘文, 张嘉琪, 夏凌翔, 吴捷, 王依宁. 4～9年级学生社会适应问卷的信效度检验：基于大样本调查研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 395-401.
[4]	关文军, 吴添昊, 程毓可, 多强. 孤独症儿童父母负面评价恐惧和社交焦虑的关系：一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 418-424.
[5]	叶莹莹, 李伊凡, 亓军军, 刘艳, 周宵. 青少年儿童期情感虐待与忽视对抑郁的影响：不安全依恋、自责和责备他人的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 234-242.
[6]	唐楚涵, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 母亲基于儿童的价值及其侵入性教养与学前儿童执行功能的关系：儿童性别的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(2): 243-250.
[7]	王兴超, 田芳芳. 儿童期虐待与欺负行为：青少年道德推脱与父亲道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 108-115.
[8]	丁芳, 张欣媛, 刘娇. 小学儿童承诺认知及其归因取向的发展[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(5): 608-613.
[9]	刘春晖, 张俊怡, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 父母失败观与儿童能力实体观的关系：一项基于响应面分析的纵向研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 479-487.
[10]	郭志英. 父母教养方式与流动儿童自我控制的关系：家庭功能与自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 503-509.
[11]	吴旻, 宋文琦, 鞠佳雯. 父母粗暴养育与儿童睡眠质量的关系：核心自我评价和消极情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 344-351.
[12]	李甜甜, 顾吉有. 父母心理控制与儿童学业焦虑的关系：未来取向和父母学业参与的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 359-366.
[13]	马颖, 雷颖, 艾玥玥, 向唯鸣. 正念训练对3～4岁儿童社会行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(2): 238-244.
[14]	李甜甜, 武兵. 母亲消极情绪表露与儿童焦虑的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 72-78.
[15]	尹霞云, 朱康慈, 黎志华. 家庭功能对低收入家庭儿童外化问题行为的影响：同伴关系与希望的链式中介[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(6): 775-781.

习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响

The Effects of Age of Acquisition and Cumulative Frequency on the Recognition of Visual Characters in Children

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价