The Effect of Encoding-retrieval Match and Cue Overload on Part-list Cuing Effect

Abstract

Abstract: The encoding-retrieval match has been established as a means to improve memory performance. It has recently been proposed that memory performance is determined by the encoding-retrieval match and that the cue overload effect needs to be taken into account when predicting memory performance. Two experiments were conducted to explore the effect of encoding-retrieval match and cue-overload on part-list cuing effect. By adopting semantic match task, Experiment 1 examined the effect of encoding-retrieval match on part-list cuing effect. On the basis of Experiment 1, Experiment 2 Examined the combined effect of encoding-retrieval match and cue-overload on part-list cuing effect. The findings show that increasing the overall encoding-retrieval match reduces the negative influence of part-list cues, which is sensitive to cue-overload; only when the part-list cues provide the diagnostic information of target items, can the memory performance be improved. The results indicates that the combined action of encoding-retrieval match and cue-overload is a better predictor of memory performance when providing part-list cues.

Key words: part-list cues, memory retrieval, encoding-retrieval match, cue overload, memory-as-discrimination

摘要： 编码-提取匹配的观点指出，提取线索与编码情境的匹配程度决定回忆成绩；但辨别过程的观点认为，除了编码-提取匹配外，还需考虑线索的负荷。通过两个实验，本研究考察上述观点能否解释部分线索对记忆提取的作用机制。实验1考察编码-提取匹配对部分线索效应的影响，结果发现：不匹配部分线索诱发经典的部分线索干扰效应，匹配性部分线索则产生部分线索促进效应；实验2进一步考察编码-提取匹配和线索负荷对部分线索效应的共同作用，结果发现：编码-提取匹配和线索负荷共同决定部分线索对记忆提取的作用，高编码-提取匹配、低线索负荷条件下，被试回忆成绩最好。结果表明，部分线索对记忆提取的作用取决于部分线索是否提供了关于目标项目的辨别性信息。

关键词: 部分线索, 记忆提取, 编码-提取匹配, 线索负荷, 辨别

CLC Number:

B842

LIU Tuanli, ZHAO Yufei, XING Min, BAI Xuejun. The Effect of Encoding-retrieval Match and Cue Overload on Part-list Cuing Effect[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2019, 17(4): 433-441.

刘湍丽, 赵宇飞, 邢敏, 白学军. 编码-提取匹配和线索负荷对部分线索效应的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(4): 433-441.

References

白学军, 巩彦斌, 刘湍丽. (2014). 提取抑制对错误记忆的影响. 心理学探新, 34(2), 124-130, doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2014.02.005
白学军, 刘湍丽, 邢敏, 巩彦斌. (2015). 记忆提取的决定因素:线索负荷、编码-提取匹配和辨别. 心理科学进展, 23(3), 349-363
刘湍丽, 白学军. (2017). 部分线索对记忆提取的影响:认知抑制能力的作用. 心理学报, 49(9), 1158-1171
刘旭. (2013). 提取诱发遗忘的发展及其机制研究(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学.
刘源, 梁南元, 王德进, 张社英, 杨铁鹰, 揭春雨, 孙伟. (1990). 现代汉语常用词词频词典-音序部分. 北京:宇航出版社.
唐卫海, 刘湍丽, 石英, 冯虹, 刘希平. (2014). 图片部分线索效应的学习时间分配的发展. 心理学报, 46(5), 621-638
Albinsson, M., & Andréasson, T. (2015). What effect does the relationship between the encoding-retrieval match and cue overload have on memory performance? Is confidence-accuracy correlation affected by the diagnostic value of a cue? An assessment of memory functions (Unpublished bachelor's thesis). Lund University.
Badham, S. P., Poirier, M., Gandhi, N., Hadjivassiliou, A., & Maylor, E. A. (2016). Aging and memory as discrimination:Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge. Psychology and Aging, 31(7), 758-770, doi:10.1037/pag0000126.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645, doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Bäuml, K. H., & Samenieh, A. (2012). Influences of part-list cuing on different forms of episodic forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 366-375, doi:10.1037/a0025367.
Beaman, C. P., Hanczakowski, M., Hodgetts, H. M., Marsh, J. E., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Memory as discrimination:What distraction reveals. Memory & Cognition, 41(8), 1238-1251.
Bramão, I., & Johansson, M. (2015). The encoding-retrieval match principle and the diagnostic value of the retrieval cue:An event-related potential study. Abstract from Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, United States.
Bramão, I., & Johansson, M. (2017). Benefits and costs of context reinstatement in episodic memory:An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(1), 52-64, doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01035.
Brown, A. S., & Hall, L. A. (1979). Part-list cueing inhibition in semantic memory structures. American Journal of Psychology, 92(2), 351-362, doi:10.2307/1421929.
Dewhurst, S. A., & Brandt, K. R. (2007). Reinstating effortful encoding operations at test enhances episodic remembering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 543-550, doi:10.1080/17470210601137086.
Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., Mohr, G., & Sellen, O. (1994). Memory of self-performed tasks:Self-performing during recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 34-39.
Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 3(6), 701-711, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.701.
Fritz, C. O., & Morris, P. E. (2015). Part-set cuing of texts, scenes, and matrices. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 1-21, doi:10.1111/bjop.2015.106.issue-1.
Garcia-Marques, L., Garrido, M. V., Hamilton, D. L., & Ferreira, M. B. (2012). Effects of correspondence between encoding and retrieval organization in social memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 200-206, doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.017.
Glisky, E. L., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1985). Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 193-205, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.193.
Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments:On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325-331, doi:10.1111/bjop.1975.66.issue-3.
Goh, W. D., & Lu, S. H. X. (2012). Testing the myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory & Cognition, 40(1), 28-39.
Goh, W. D., & Tan, H. Q. (2006). Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall:Does foil context matter? Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1063-1079.
Hofmeister, P. (2011). Representational complexity and memory retrieval in language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 376-405, doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.492642.
Isarida, T., Isarida, T. K., & Sakai, T. (2012). Effects of study time and meaningfulness on environmental context-dependent recognition. Memory & Cognition, 40(8), 1225-1235.
John, T., & Aslan, A. (2018). Part-list cuing effects in children:A developmental dissociation between the detrimental and beneficial effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 705-712, doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.013.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger Ⅲ, H. L. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151-162, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004.
Kent, C., & Lamberts, K. (2008). The encoding-retrieval relationship:Retrieval as mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), 92-98, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.004.
Marsh, E. J., Dolan, P. O., Balota, D. A., & Roediger Ⅲ, H. L. (2004). Part-set cuing effects in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 134-144, doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.134.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519-533, doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80016-9.
Nairne, J. S. (2002). The myth of the encoding-retrieval match. Memory, 10(5-6), 389-395.
Nairne, J. S. (2005). The functionalist agenda in memory research. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 115-126). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
Nairne, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness:Implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27-46). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing:A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 531-552.
Poirier, M., Nairne, J. S., Morin, C., Zimmermann, F. G. S., Koutmeridou, K., & Fowler, J. (2012). Memory as discrimination:A challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(1), 16-29, doi:10.1037/a0024956.
Roediger Ⅲ, H. L., Stellon, C. C., & Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 3(2), 174-188, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.2.174.
Roediger Ⅲ, H. L., Tekin, K., & Uner, O. (2017). Encoding-retrieval interactions. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory:A comprehensive reference (pp. 5-26). New York, NY:Academic Press.
Slamecka, N. J. (1968). An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(4), 504-513, doi:10.1037/h0025695.
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2015). Cue generation:How learners flexibly support future retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 922-938.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York:Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 381-391, doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80048-8.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373, doi:10.1037/h0020071.
Ulatowska, J., Olszewska, J., & Hanson, M. D. (2016). Do format differences in the presentation of information affect susceptibility to memory distortions? The three-stage misinformation procedure reconsidered. American Journal of Psychology, 129(4), 407-417, doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.4.0407.
Ward, E. V., Maylor, E. A., Poirier, M., Korko, M., & Ruud, J. C. M. (2016). A benefit of context reinstatement to recognition memory in aging:the role of familiarity processes. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(6), 1-20.
Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory, 1(4), 442-452, doi:10.1037/0278-7393.1.4.442.
Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memory's echo:Vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(20), 11125-11129, doi:10.1073/pnas.97.20.11125.
Wheeler, R. L., & Gabbert, F. (2017). Using self-generated cues to facilitate recall:A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1830, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01830.

[1]	ZHANG Yuzhi, GAO Yi, ZHANG Jijia. The Positional Effect of Semantic and Grammatical Activation of Semantic Radical Under Semantic Radical Priming Paradigm [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 721-727.
[2]	ZHANG Zhenghua, ZHANG Hang, WANG Bing, ZHENG Zilong, ZHAO Liming, LI Weijun. The Processing of the Tone and the Vowel in Poems Under Different Tasks: Evidence from ERPs [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 728-735.
[3]	ZHAO Sainan, LI Lin, ZHANG Lijuan, WANG Jingxin. The Influence of Constrictive Context on the Processing of Unpredictable Word in Chinese Reading [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 736-742.
[4]	CHEN Yixin, ZHANG Qihan, XIA Yidan, ZHAO Bingjie, BAI Xuejun. Motor Prediction of Others in Synchronized Joint Action: The Critical Role of Feedback Cue [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 743-749.
[5]	REN Yaping, SUN Yan, ZHAO Xuesong. The Influence of Ego Depletion on Self-Other Risk Decision-Making Under Different Task Frames [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(6): 750-756.
[6]	ZHU Huan, XIE Xiaowei, DAI Zheru, TANG Xiaoya, ZANG Jian, WU Jiao, ZANG Xuelian. Semantic Information Takes Precedence over Spatial Location and Glyph Feature in Contextual Cueing with Chinese Characters [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 577-584.
[7]	LIU Lu, JIANG Yamei, ZHANG Qiaoming, LI Zhuyang. Influence of the Position and Transparency of Semantic Radicals on Semantic Activation in Chinese Phonogram Recognition [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 585-591.
[8]	LIU Zhifang, ZENG Taishen, CHAI Lin, CHEN Chaoyang, TONG Wen. The Characteristics of Word Processing When Deaf Readers Read Chinese: Evidences from Disappearing Text [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.
[9]	YANG Xue, LEI Jianghua. The Regulatory Role of Reading Ability in Phonological Coding of Hearing-Impaired College Students [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 599-605.
[10]	LI Sainan, YAN Guoli, WANG Yali, LIU Min, ZHAO Shuping. The Perceptual Span for Chinese Grade 1 Primary School Students [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(5): 606-611.
[11]	ZHANG Suyuan, LAN Zebo, ZHANG Shui, MENG Zhu, YAN Guoli. The Effects of Irrelevant Speech on Reading Among First Graders First-Grade Students: An Eye-Tracking Study [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 433-438,446.
[12]	LI Yunsong, CHEN Qiyang, WU Yan, LI Tianhong, DUAN Rujun. The Dominant Role of Semantic Radicals in Chinese Phonogram Recognition [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 439-446.
[13]	YANG Weiping, YANG Xiangfu, XU Jianping. The Influence of Cross-Modal Audiovisual Emotional Information on Baby Schema Effect [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 447-453.
[14]	LIU Pengfei, CUI Jiaxin, REN Weicong, ZHANG Zhijie. The Acquisition Process of Time Concept in 4~7 Years Old Children [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 454-459.
[15]	SONG Yiqi, YANG Wanqing, LIANG Dandan. Metaphorical Mapping of Spatial Concept “Da” in 6~8 Years Old Mandarin-Speaking Children with High-Functioning Autism [J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19(4): 460-465.