中学生感知到的数学教师支持问卷的编制

心理与行为研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 511-517.

中学生感知到的数学教师支持问卷的编制

柴晓运^{1, 2, 3}, 龚少英^{1, 2}

1 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉 430079;
2 华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,武汉 430079;
3 湖北汽车工业学院心理健康教育中心,十堰 442002

收稿日期:2012-06-15 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2015-02-15
通讯作者: 龚少英,女,华中师范大学心理学院教授,博士。E-mail:gongsy_psy@163.com。
作者简介:柴晓运,男,华中师范大学心理学院硕士生,现为湖北汽车工业学院心理健康教育中心教师。
基金资助:
本研究得到教育部人文社科一般项目（13YJA190005）、华中师大中央高校基本科研业务费重大科研培育项目（CCNU11C01005）和专项资金科研项目（120002040498）的资助

The Development of Questionnaire on Perceived Mathematics Teacher Support for Middle School Students

Chai Xiaoyun^{1, 2, 3}, Gong Shaoying^{1, 2}

1 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
2 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University and Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079;
3 Center for Mental Health Education , Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002

Received:2012-06-15 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2015-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用理论分析和开放式问卷调查等方法提出中学生感知到的数学教师支持的基本结构并编制问卷项目。先以302名中学生为被试,对自编初始问卷进行预测,结果显示,中学生感知到的数学教师支持问卷包括情感支持、自主支持和认知支持3个维度。再对347名中学生正式施测,进行信度和验证性因素分析,结果显示,总问卷α系数为0.92,三个维度α系数在0.75~0.89之间,验证性因素分析各项拟合指标较为理想,具有较好的结构效度。因此,编制的问卷具有较好的信效度,是测量中学生感知到的数学教师支持的有效工具。

关键词: 中学生, 数学, 教师支持, 问卷

Abstract: The structure of perceived mathematics teacher support for middle school students was proposed according to theoretical analysis and open questionnaire investigation. Based on this structure, the questionnaire on perceived mathematics teacher support was developed. The preliminary questionnaire was administrated to 302 middle school students who were sampled from a junior and high middle school. With exploratory factor analysis, the result indicated that the structure of perceived mathematics teacher support consisted of affective support, autonomy support and cognitive support. Finally, reliability and confirmatory factor analysis was used to data base collected from 347 students. The result showed that the Cronbach α coefficients of the scale was 0.92, and the Cronbach α coefficient of three factors were ranged from 0.75 to 0.89. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire has good construct validity and the fit indexes are good. In addition, the questionnaire has high reliability and validity and it is a validate measurement to evaluate the perceived mathematics teacher support for middle school students.

Key words: middle school student, mathematics, teacher support, questionnaire

中图分类号:

B844.2

柴晓运, 龚少英. 中学生感知到的数学教师支持问卷的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2013, 11(4): 511-517.

Chai Xiaoyun, Gong Shaoying. The Development of Questionnaire on Perceived Mathematics Teacher Support for Middle School Students[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 511-517.

参考文献

1 柴晓运, 龚少英, 段婷, 钟柳, 焦永清.(2011). 师生之间的动机感染：基于社会认知的视角. 心理科学进展, 19 (8), 1166-1173.
2 简晋龙, 任宗浩, 张淑婷.(2008). 跨学科间自我概念与学业成就路径模式之检验——整合模式在数学和科学领域的适用性. 教育心理学报, 40 (1), 107-126.
3 徐先彩, 龚少英.(2009). 学业情绪及其影响因素. 心理科学进展, 17 (1), 92-97.
4 Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G.(2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15 (5), 397-413.
5 Bokhorst, C. L., Sumter, S. R., & Westenberg, P. M.(2010). Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: Who Is perceived as most supportive? Social Development, 19 (2), 417-426.
6 Brewster, A. B., & Bowen, G. L.(2004). Teacher support and the school engagement of latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21 (1), 47-67.
7 Chen, J. J. L.(2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents′ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 131 (2), 77-127.
8 Danielsen, A. G., Samdal, O., Hetland, J., & Wold, B.(2009). School-related social support and students′ perceived life satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 102 (4), 303-320.
9 Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C.(2006). The domain specificity of academic emotional experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75 (1), 5-29.
10 Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Gueta, G.(2010). Students′ needs, teachers′ support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78 (8), 246-267.
11 Lam, S.-f., & Law, Y.-k.(2007). The roles of instructional practices and motivation in writing performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75 (2), 145-164.
12 Lam, S., Cheng, R. W., & Ma, W. Y. K.(2009). Teacher and student intrinsic motivation in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 37 (6), 565-578.
13 Metheny, J., McWhirter, E. H., & O′Neil, M.(2008). Measuring perceived teacher support and its influence on adolescent career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16 (2), 218-237.
14 Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C.(2007). Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 243-258). San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.
15 Mitchell, S. N., & DellaMattera, J. N.(2010). Teacher support and student′ s self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 5 (2), 24-35.
16 Murberg, T. A.(2010). The role of personal attributes and social support factors on passive behaviour in classroom among secondary school students: A prospective study. Social Psychology of Education, 13 (4), 511-522.
17 Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R.(2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102 (4), 896-915.
18 Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J.(2007). Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316 (5828), 1128-1129.
19 Rosiek, J.(2003). Emotional scaffolding: An exploration of the teacher knowledge at the intersection of student emotion and the subject matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (5), 399-412.
20 Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J.(1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85 (4), 571-581.
21 Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T.(2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (4), 765-781.
22 Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C.(2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39 (2), 97-110.
23 Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J.(2009). Teacher support and adolescents′ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38 (1), 67-85.
24 Titsworth, S., Quinlan, M. M., & Mazer, J. P.(2010). Emotion in teaching and learning: development and validation of the classroom emotions scale. Communication Education, 59 (4), 431-452.
25 Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B.(2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35 (3), 193-202.

[1]	李嘉欣, 雒瑞帆, 封洪敏, 司继伟. 初中生感知到的同伴支持与数学学习投入—基于变量为中心和个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(5): 629-636.
[2]	曾玲娟, 江丽晶, 彭叶. 家庭环境和教师支持对中学生学业拖延的影响：基本心理需求满足与心理资本的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(4): 501-507.
[3]	王江洋, 王蒙歌. 拒绝敏感性与留守中学生病理性网络使用：生命意义感和自我污名的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 219-225.
[4]	陆芳, 付淑英. 农村儿童社会性发展问卷的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(2): 248-254.
[5]	邱晨, 牛美心, 周新林, 杨涛. 四、七年级学生分数数量表征与数学学业成就的关系：分数概念理解的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 628-635.
[6]	史滋福, 唐婉秋, 谢云天. 初中生认知需求与数学学业成绩的关系：基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(4): 480-485.
[7]	孙芳, 李欢欢, 包佳敏, 甄子昂, 宋巍, 蒋松源. 教师支持、同伴支持与中学生心理危机的关系：歧视知觉的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(2): 209-215.
[8]	孙小坚, 宋乃庆, 梁学友. 感知的父母及教师支持与学生STEAM学习的持续性动机：学习兴趣和自我效能感的多重中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 37-44.
[9]	张莉. 儿童执行功能与早期学业能力的关系：学习品质的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(1): 52-58.
[10]	刘文, 孟祥蕊, 车翰博, 张嘉琪, 沈漪. 小学生创造性人格教师评定问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(5): 624-630.
[11]	曾桐奥, 卜晓鸥, 王庭照, 马海林. 听障儿童抑制控制能力特点及其与数学基本能力的关系[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 517-523.
[12]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 王文, 谢笑春, 王宏, 顾婷玉. 中国中学生和大学生幸福感常模的制定[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(4): 530-536.
[13]	王战旗, 张兴利. 创造力成就问卷的中文修订[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 390-397.
[14]	王立东, 李倩, 罗良. 父母家校沟通与小学生参与数学课外补习的关系研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(1): 67-71.
[15]	张佳佳, 李红霞, 张明亮, 赵晓萌, 司继伟. 小学儿童感知到的教师支持、数学自我效能感与数学成绩的联系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(5): 644-651.