中文阅读中基于字、词的眼跳目标选择策略：来自消失文本方面的证据*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用两项消失文本实验考察中文阅读中眼跳选择目标的策略问题。实验一操控注视词（词n）上不同位置汉字的呈现与消失情况,结果发现无论单字消失条件（注视字消失、非注视字消失）还是单词消失条件,三种消失条件对再注视概率的影响程度相同,说明词内再注视眼跳选择目标的基本依据单元是整个视觉词汇。实验二操控词n+1处汉字的呈现与消失情况,结果发现只有词n+1消失条件的跳读概率大于控制条件,词n+1消失条件下的相邻词间眼跳数量小于控制条件,词n+1内单个汉字的消失（字n+1消失和字n+2消失）条件都不影响跳读概率和相邻词间眼跳数量,说明相邻词间眼跳选择目标的基本依据单元是汉字。文章进一步讨论了字词加工在眼跳目标选择环节中的作用。

关键词: 中文阅读, 眼跳, 消失文本, 眼动。

Abstract: In present study, we investigated both saccades generating refixations and saccades across two adjacent words with two disappearing text experiments. Both experiments contained three disappearing conditions(two-character disappearing condition and one word disappearing condition)and a control. The aim of Experiment 1 was to investigate refixations saccades and the aim of Experiment 2 was to investigate across words saccades. Character disappearing manipulations influence on probability of words been refixated equally to word n disappearing manipulation in Experiment 1, which indicated that saccade of refixations was based on fixated word. However, word n+1 disappearing manipulation influenced skip probability and the number of saccades across adjacent words more seriously than character disappearing manipulations in Experiment 2, which indicated that targeting of saccades between two adjacent words was based on character. In this article, we further discussed the role of character-word procession in saccades targeting.

Key words: Chinese reading, saccades, disappearing text, eye movements.

刘志方王若逸，张智君，刘炜. 中文阅读中基于字、词的眼跳目标选择策略：来自消失文本方面的证据^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 27-35.

Liu Zhifang, Wang Ruoyi, Zhang Zhijun, Liu Wei. Saccadic Targeting Based on Character and Word in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Disappearing Text[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2016, 14(1): 27-35.

参考文献

1 李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰.(2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459-470.
2 刘志方, 张智君, 赵亚军.(2011). 汉语阅读中眼跳目标选择单元以及词汇加工方式: 来自消失文本的实验证据. 心理学报, 43(6), 608-618.
3 吴捷, 刘志方, 刘妮娜.(2011). 词频、可预测性及合理性对目标词首次注视位置的影响. 心理与行为研究, 9(2), 140-147.
4 Bai, X., Liang, F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P.(2013). Interword spacing effects on the acquisition of new vocabulary for readers of Chinese as a second language. Journal of Research in Resding, 36(S1), S4-S17.
5 Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K.(2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1277-1287.
6 Becker, W., & Jürgens, R.(1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research. 19(9), 967-983.
7 Blythe, H. I., Liang, F., Zang, C., Wang, J., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Liversedge, S. P.(2012). Inserting spaces into Chinese text helps readers to learn new words: An eye movement study. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 241-254.
8 Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R.(2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42(5), 621-636.
9 Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R.(2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
10 Kliegl, R., Nuthmann. A., & Engbert, R.(2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 135(1), 12-35.
11 Li, X., & Ma, G.(2012). Word boundaries affect visual attention in Chinese reading. PLoS ONE 7(11): e48905. doi:10.1371/journal. pone. 0048905
12 Li, X. S., & Logan, G. D.(2008). Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words: Beyond gestalt principles. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 945-949.
13 Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K.(2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location?. Vision Research, 51(10), 1146-1156.
14 Li, X., & Pollatsek, A.(2011). Word knowledge influences character perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 833-839.
15 Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. P.(2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.
16 Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X.(2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000057.
17 Li, X., & Shen, W.(2013). Joint effect of insertion of spaces and word length in saccade target selection in Chinese reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(S1), S64-S77.
18 Liu, P., & Li, X.(2014). Inserting spaces before and after words affects word processing differently in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 57-68.
19 Liversedge, S. P., Rayner, K., White, S. J., Vergilino-Perez, D., Findlay, J. M., & Kentridge, R. W.(2004). Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?. Vision Research, 44(10), 1013-1024.
20 Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K.(2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1046-1059.
21 Ma, G., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A.(2015). There is no relationship between the preferred viewing location and word segmentation in Chinese reading. Visual Cognition. 23(3), 399-414.
22 McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M.(1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(3), 245-253.
23 Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R.(2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45(17), 2201-2217.
24 Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K.(2006). Test of the E-Z reader mold: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52(1), 1-56.
25 Rayner, K.(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
26 Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G.(2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1089-1093.
27 Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K.(2006). E-Z reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
28 Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A.(2003). The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445-526.
29 Reilly, R., & Radach, R.(2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive System Research, 7, 34-55.
30 Shen, D., Liversedge, S.P., Tian, J., Zang, C., Cui, L., Bai, X., Yan,G., & Rayner, K.(2012). Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 192-202.
31 Shu, H., Zhou, X., Yan, M., & Kliegl. R.(2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Atten Percept Psychophys, 73(2), 482-490.
32 Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A.(2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese. Vision Research, 80, 1-6.
33 Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K.(2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259-268.
34 Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H.(2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725.
35 Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R.(2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 209-219.
36 Yang, S-N., & McConkie, G. W.(2004). Saccade generation during reading: are words necessary?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 226-261.

[1]	张慢慢, 胡惠兰, 边菡, 李芳, 张志超, 臧传丽. 中文阅读中快速读者与慢速读者的词频效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(3): 304-310.
[2]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 马绍扬. 嵌套词汉字位置加工的亚词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2022, 20(1): 1-7.
[3]	刘志方, 曾台燊, 柴林, 陈朝阳, 仝文. 失聪学生阅读中的词汇加工特点：消失文本证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 592-598.
[4]	张慢慢, 张志超, 臧传丽. 跳读是基于副中央凹词的部分加工还是完全加工？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(3): 311-317.
[5]	仝文, 任梦雪, 刘志方, 冯笑. 词长对中文阅读眼跳目标选择的影响：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 168-175.
[6]	顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. 汉字位置加工的词边界效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2020, 18(2): 193-199.
[7]	刘志方, 陈朝阳, 仝文, 苏衡. 阅读中词汇识别依赖词内字序编码的阶段性特点：眼动证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17(3): 304-310.
[8]	赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6): 721-734.
[9]	王永胜, 陈茗静, 赵冰洁, 李馨, 白宇鸽. 副中央凹中字N+1与字N+2在眼跳目标选择中的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(6): 756-765.
[10]	于文勃,王佩金,苏晓雨,陈真征,陈庆荣. 标签位置和内容对女性网购影响的眼动研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(5): 691-696.
[11]	闫国利, 何立媛, 宋子明. 中文阅读的基本信息加工单元初探^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2016, 14(1): 120-126.
[12]	肖艳丽, 阴国恩, 杨文. 面孔部件相似性判断中不同部件的相互影响研究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(6): 729-736.
[13]	马谐, 刘佳, 刘艳, 陶云, 张秋月, 陈睿. 背景音乐对中—英文阅读理解的影响效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(4): 472-478.
[14]	杨素,白学军. 不同民族大学生自我意识情绪识别线索的眼动研究^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2015, 13(3): 289-295.
[15]	张巧明，崔磊. 小学生对不同词语类型预视加工的发展^*[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014, 12(5): 645-651.

中文阅读中基于字、词的眼跳目标选择策略：来自消失文本方面的证据^*

Saccadic Targeting Based on Character and Word in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Disappearing Text

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价