团队学习气氛对团队心理资本的影响：社会信息加工理论的视角

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于社会信息加工理论，旨在探索团队学习气氛及其三个维度指标（安全气氛、参与决策、开放交流）对团队心理资本的影响。对全国多地的122个团队数据进行回归分析，结果发现：总体上，团队学习气氛显著正向影响团队心理资本；此外，团队学习气氛的三个指标，即安全气氛、参与决策和开放交流均显著正向影响团队心理资本。

关键词: 团队心理资本, 团队学习气氛, 安全气氛, 参与决策, 开放交流

Abstract: Drawing on social information processing theory, this paper examined whether team learning climate and its three dimensions could exert effect on team psychological capital. Using the data of 122 teams across various cities in China, this paper conducted regression analysis. The results showed that team learning climate positively predicted team psychological safety overall; Besides, the three dimensions of team learning climate, namely safety climate, participant in decision-making and open communication also had a positive predictive effect on team psychological capital.

Key words: team psychological capital, team learning climate, safety climate, participant in decision–making, open communication

中图分类号:

B849
C936

邹艳春, 彭坚, 印田彬. 团队学习气氛对团队心理资本的影响：社会信息加工理论的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(3): 402-407.

ZOU Yanchun, PENG Jian, YIN Tianbin. The Effect of Team Learning Climate on Team Psychological Capital:A Social Information Processing Perspective[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2018, 16(3): 402-407.

参考文献

郭婧洲, 赵亚普. (2017). 他山之石可以攻玉:间接社会网络对员工创造力的影响. 中国人力资源开发, (8), 59-70.
柯江林, 孙健敏, 李永瑞. (2009). 心理资本:本土量表的开发及中西比较. 心理学报, 41(9), 875-888.
柯江林, 吴丹, 孙健敏. (2015). 心理资本对工作投入、主观幸福感与沉默行为的影响:交互效应与效应比较. 心理与行为研究, 13(6), 804-810.
邵真, 冯玉强, 王铁男. (2015). 变革型领导风格对企业信息系统学习的作用机制研究——组织学习型文化的中介作用. 管理评论, 27(11), 140-150.
宋欣, 周玉玺, 杨阳. (2014). 多层次导向的心理资本与知识员工创新绩效——基于团队社会资本的调节中介模型. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), (9), 89-102, 113.
邹艳春, 印田彬. (2017a). 心理安全感对工作绩效的作用路径分析——社会交换理论的视角. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 16(7), 61-67.
邹艳春, 印田彬. (2017b). 多层次视角下的心理安全研究评述. 中国人力资源开发, (4), 66-75.
Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation:The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Janz, B. D., & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management:The importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 351-384.
Kjersti, B., Morten-Birkeland, N., Kathryn, M., & Jarle, E. (2015). The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 74, 27-36.
Liang, J., & Farh, L. J. L. (2008, June). Promotive and prohibitive voice behavior in organizations:A two-wave longitudinal Examination. Paper presented at the third international association of Chinese management research conference, Guangzhou, China.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management:Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-156.
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital:beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development:Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387-393.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital:Developing the human competitive edge. New York:Oxford University Press.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture:The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.
Mathe, K., Scott-Halsell, S., Kim, S., & Krawczyk, M. (2017). Psychological capital in the quick service restaurant industry:A study of unit-level performance. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 41(7), 823-845.
Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 19-33.
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 429-437.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253.
Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3nd ed.). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters:Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600-613.
Sweetman, D., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Luthans, B. C. (2011). Relationship between positive psychological capital and creative performance. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 4-13.
West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & Carsten, M. K. (2009). Team level positivity:Investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 249-267.
Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D. N., & Wu, Y. H. (2014). Impact of authentic leadership on performance:role of followers' positive psychological capital and relational processes. Journal of Organization Behavior, 35(1), 5-21.
Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Oke, A. (2011). Retracted:Authentically leading groups:the mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 4-24.
Wu, S. (2015). Exploring the effects of psychological capital and social capital on team creativity in ISD teams. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 7(3), 34-46.

[1]	游旭群, 李倩钦, 张桢堉, 黄浦江, 刘志远. N-back任务训练迁移效果及其影响因素：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 794-801.
[2]	熊思成, 张斌, 姜永志, 蒋怀滨, 陈芸. 手机成瘾流行率及其影响因素的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 802-808.
[3]	郭颖, 樊富珉, 张英俊, 刘宇. 团体咨询师胜任力量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 809-815.
[4]	姚崇, 惠琪, 王媛, 席海莎, 雒朝梁. 公费师范教师社会支持与职业倦怠的关系探究[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 816-823.
[5]	李飞飞, 缴润凯, 刘丹, 尹航. 幼儿教师感恩特质与职业使命感的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 824-830.
[6]	周彦榜, 李强, 暴卿. 跨期决策中的偏好反转：突出性效应和兼容性效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 831-837.
[7]	侯娟, 郑心怡, 王秀, 方晓义. 金钱与时间感受启动对择偶标准的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 838-844.
[8]	窦运来, 沈伊默. 参与式领导如何影响团队成员的工作表现？—有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 845-852.
[9]	杨槐, 龚少英, 苗天长, 李伟贺. 工作-非工作边界管理一致性与高校辅导员工作满意度的关系：工作投入的中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(6): 853-860.
[10]	王艳丽, 陈红. 城市社区居民获得感量表的编制[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 665-670.
[11]	贾晓珊, 朱海东. 社会经济地位与儿童青少年心理健康关系的元分析[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 671-678.
[12]	黄明明, 陈丽萍, 郭莉萍, 赵守盈. 工作-家庭冲突与幼儿教师离职意向的关系：职业认同感与职业倦怠的序列中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 679-686.
[13]	刘传军, 谢忠桔, 王星元. 诱发高兴情绪会降低人们的道德规范敏感度吗？[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 687-694.
[14]	张霄钰, 朱海燕, 陈凤姣, 苏欣悦. 月是故乡明：家乡标签对风景图的情感和价值评估的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 695-700.
[15]	苏明宇, 王光明. STEAM训练提升小学生的注意抑制与注意集中能力[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2021, 19(5): 701-705.