习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2024.03.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

考察五年级小学生在三项汉字识别任务中识别习得早−高频字、习得早−低频字、习得中−低频字和习得晚−低频字的习得年龄效应与累计频率效应。结果发现：(1)语音范畴判断任务和汉字命名任务存在习得年龄效应，ln(习得时长)能预测这两项任务的反应时；(2)语义范畴判断任务和汉字命名任务存在累计频率效应，ln(频率值)能预测这两项任务的反应时。研究结果支持语音完整性假设和网络可塑性假设，不支持累计频率假设和语义假设。

关键词: 习得年龄, 累计频率, 儿童, 汉字识别

Abstract:

To investigate the role of age of acquisition (AoA) and cumulative frequency in children’s visual character recognition, four types of characters (early AoA - high frequency, early AoA - low frequency, medium AoA - low frequency, and late AoA - low frequency) were designed, and three types of tasks were conducted in the present study to explore the effects of AoA and cumulative frequency. The results showed that the cumulative frequency effects were present in both the semantic classification task and the immediate naming task, and the AoA effects were present in both the phonetic classification task and the immediate naming task. The regression analysis confirmed that the log-transformed reaction time of recognizing characters in the semantic classification task and the immediate naming task were both predicted by the ln(cumulative frequency), while the reaction time of recognizing characters in the phonetic classification task and the immediate naming task were both predicted by the ln(time known). The above results consistently indicate that the phonological completeness hypothesis and the network plasticity hypothesis, but not the semantic hypothesis and the cumulative frequency hypothesis, can account for AoA and cumulative frequency effects in children’s visual character recognition.

Key words: age of acquisition, cumulative frequency, children, character recognition

巫金根, 郭梅华, 于棋, 王冰然, 程小云, 闫国利. 习得年龄和累计频率对儿童汉字识别的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 297-304.

Jingen WU, Meihua GUO, Qi YU, Bingran WANG, Xiaoyun CHENG, Guoli YAN. The Effects of Age of Acquisition and Cumulative Frequency on the Recognition of Visual Characters in Children[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2024, 22(3): 297-304.

图/表 5

参考文献 0

	陈宝国, 彭聃龄. 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(Ⅰ). 心理学报, 2001, 33 (1): 1- 6.
	陈宝国, 王立新, 彭聃龄. 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(Ⅱ). 心理学报, 2003, 35 (5): 576- 581.
	陈宝国, 王立新, 王璐璐, 彭聃龄. 词汇习得年龄和频率对词汇识别的影响. 心理科学, 2004, 27 (5): 1060- 1064. DOI
	陈宝国, 尤文平, 王立新. 词汇习得年龄效应的研究进展. 心理科学, 2006, 29 (6): 1515- 1517, 1495. DOI
	陈宝国, 尤文平, 张亚峰, 刘文焕. 汉字早期字形加工阶段的习得年龄效应. 心理科学, 2010, 33 (3): 726- 728.
	陈宝国, 尤文平, 周会霞. 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应: 语义假设的证据. 心理学报, 2007, 39 (1): 9- 17.
	陈俊, 林少惠, 张积家. 潮汕话-普通话双言者的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 2011, 43 (2): 111- 122.
	李利平, 伍新春, 封安生, 陈芸. 学龄儿童早期汉语默读流畅的发展轨迹及影响因素. 心理与行为研究, 2019, 17 (5): 627- 633.
	娄昊, 李丛, 张清芳. 习得年龄对客体和动作图画口语命名的不同影响: ERP研究. 心理学报, 2019, 51 (2): 143- 153.
	温红博, 唐文君, 刘先伟. 识字能力的单维性检验研究. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32 (1): 73- 80.
	张积家, 陈穗清, 张广岩, 戴东红. 聋大学生的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 2012, 44 (11): 1421- 1433.
	张振军, 丁国盛, 陈宝国. 汉字习得的年龄效应: 语音完整性假设的检验. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27 (6): 577- 583.
	Anwyl-Irvine, A., Dalmaijer, E. S., Hodges, N., & Evershed, J. K. Realistic precision and accuracy of online experiment platforms, web browsers, and devices. Behavior Research Methods, 2021, 53 (4): 1407- 1425. DOI
	Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008, 59 (4): 390- 412. DOI
	Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved July 3, 2023, from http://www.praat.org/
	Bonin, P., Barry, C., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story. Journal of Memory and Language, 2004, 50 (4): 456- 476. DOI
	Brown, G. D. A., & Watson, F. L. First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition, 1987, 15 (3): 208- 216.
	Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920960351.
	Brysbaert, M., Wijnendaele, I. V., & Deyne, S. D. Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 2000, 104 (2): 215- 226. DOI
	Cai, Z. G., Huang, S. T., Xu, Z. B., & Zhao, N. Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 2022, 54 (1): 311- 323. DOI
	Chang, Y. N., & Lee, C. Y. Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 (6): 1317- 1324.
	Chen, B. G., Dent, K., You, W. P., & Wu, G. L. Age of acquisition affects early orthographic processing during Chinese character recognition. Acta Psychologica, 2009, 130 (3): 196- 203. DOI
	Chen, B. G., Zhou, H. X., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 2007, 98 (3): 499- 516. DOI
	Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1103–1123.
	Elsherif, M. M., Preece, E., & Catling, J. C. (2023). Age-of-acquisition effects: A literature review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(5), 812–847.
	Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 267–283.
	Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 2004, 115 (1): 43- 67. DOI
	Juhasz, B. J. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 2005, 131 (5): 684- 712. DOI
	Lété, B., & Bonin, P. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013, 66 (5): 973- 1000. DOI
	Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S., & Ellis, H. D. Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: Are they simply cumulative-frequency effects. Cognition, 2001, 78 (2): 189- 205. DOI
	Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H. Y., & Peng, H. Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 2012, 35 (3): 287- 307. DOI
	Menenti, L., & Burani, C. What causes the effect of age of acquisition in lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2007, 60 (5): 652- 660. DOI
	Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 116–133.
	Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 2000, 91 (2): 167- 180. DOI
	Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., Chappell, T., & Ellis, A. W. Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2002, 14 (4): 435- 459. DOI
	Pérez, M. A. Age of acquisition persists as the main factor in picture naming when cumulative word frequency and frequency trajectory are controlled. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2007, 60 (1): 32- 42. DOI
	R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
	Smith, P. T., Turner, J. E., Brown, P. A., & Henry, L. A. The distinct contributions of age of acquisition and word frequency in auditory word perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006, 59 (12): 2121- 2134. DOI
	Terzopoulos, A. R., Duncan, L. G., Wilson, M. A. J., Niolaki, G. Z., & Masterson, J. HelexKids: A word frequency database for Greek and Cypriot primary school children. Behavior Research Methods, 2017, 49 (1): 83- 96. DOI
	You, W. P., Chen, B. G., & Dunlap, S. Frequency trajectory effects in Chinese character recognition: Evidence for the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. Cognition, 2009, 110 (1): 39- 50. DOI
	Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32 (1): 31- 38.

指标	实验条件
指标	习得早−高频字	习得早−低频字	习得中−低频字	习得晚−低频字
累计频率分布范围(次/百万)	608～3359	9～124	3～48	3～39
平均累计频率(次/百万)	1645(805)	53(29)	25(14)	18(12)
平均笔画数	8.80(1.66)	8.56(2.55)	8.92(1.44)	8.60(2.20)
左右结构汉字数量(个)	15	14	18	17

指标	实验条件
指标	习得早−高频字	习得早−低频字	习得中−低频字	习得晚−低频字
累计频率分布范围(次/百万)	608～3359	9～124	3～48	3～39
平均累计频率(次/百万)	1645(805)	53(29)	25(14)	18(12)
平均笔画数	8.80(1.66)	8.56(2.55)	8.92(1.44)	8.60(2.20)
左右结构汉字数量(个)	15	14	18	17

指标	实验任务
指标	语义范畴判断	语音范畴判断	汉字命名
汉字识别测试分数(个)	125(10)	123(9)	122(10)
词表阅读测试分数(个/分)	94(17)	88(24)	89(14)
快速命名数字时间(秒)	8.21(1.06)	8.56(1.66)	9.03(1.26)

指标	实验任务
指标	语义范畴判断	语音范畴判断	汉字命名
汉字识别测试分数(个)	125(10)	123(9)	122(10)
词表阅读测试分数(个/分)	94(17)	88(24)	89(14)
快速命名数字时间(秒)	8.21(1.06)	8.56(1.66)	9.03(1.26)

实验任务	指标	实验条件
实验任务	指标	习得早−高频字	习得早−低频字	习得中−低频字	习得晚−低频字
语义范畴判断	反应时	0.79(0.21)	0.84(0.25)	0.83(0.23)	0.84(0.24)
语义范畴判断	正确率	0.99(0.11)	0.95(0.21)	0.97(0.18)	0.95(0.22)
语音范畴判断	反应时	1.08(0.38)	1.04(0.34)	1.14(0.41)	1.16(0.40)
语音范畴判断	正确率	0.96(0.19)	0.97(0.16)	0.94(0.24)	0.95(0.22)
汉字命名	反应时	0.79(0.17)	0.87(0.20)	0.99(0.26)	0.99(0.25)
汉字命名	正确率	0.99(0.09)	0.97(0.18)	0.80(0.41)	0.74(0.44)