社会临场感对大学生网络亲社会行为的影响：基于I3模型的视角

doi:10.12139/j.1672-0628.2025.04.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

网络亲社会行为是伴随互联网发展而出现的对网络文明建设有益的积极行为，但目前关于社会临场感与大学生网络亲社会行为间的机制研究仍存在不足。实验1发现，社会临场感正向预测大学生网络亲社会行为；实验2进一步发现，善意解释偏向在社会临场感对大学生网络亲社会行为的影响中起中介作用；实验3证实提升善意解释偏向可以有效促进大学生网络亲社会行为。本研究不仅为大学生网络亲社会行为的发生机制开辟多元解释路径，还拓宽了行为研究领域的新视角，为网络文明建设提供了坚实的实证依据。

关键词: 大学生, 网络亲社会行为, 社会临场感, 善意解释偏向

Abstract:

Online prosocial behavior is a positive behavior beneficial to the construction of cyber civilization that has emerged with the development of the internet. However, current research on the mechanisms between social presence and college students’ online prosocial behavior remains insufficient. Experiment 1 found that social presence positively predicted college students’ online prosocial behavior. Building on this foundation, Experiment 2 further revealed that the benign interpretation bias mediated the effect of social presence on college students’ online prosocial behavior. Experiment 3 confirmed that enhancing benign interpretation bias could effectively promote college students’ online prosocial behavior. This research not only develops multidimensional explanatory pathways for understanding the emergence of online prosocial behavior among college students, but also expands theoretical frameworks in behavioral studies while providing robust empirical evidence for the construction of cyber civilization.

Key words: college students, online prosocial behavior, social presence, benign interpretation bias

张璐, 乌云特娜. 社会临场感对大学生网络亲社会行为的影响：基于I³模型的视角[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(4): 528-535.

Lu ZHANG, Wuyuntena. The Effect of Social Presence on College Students’ Online Prosocial Behavior: The Perspective of I³ Model[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2025, 23(4): 528-535.

图/表 7

图1 社会临场感与网络亲社会行为关系的理论模型

图2 实验1流程图

图3 实验1每组选择各类图标的人数比例

图4 实验2流程图

图5 实验2每组选择各类图标的人数比例

图6 实验3流程图

图7 实验3每组选择各类图标的人数比例

参考文献 0

	丁道群, 沈模卫. 人格特质、网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系. 心理科学, 2005, 28 (2): 300- 303. DOI
	贺寨平, 金宇星. 虚拟空间中的社会资本——以微信“轻松筹”中的大病众筹为例. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, (2): 54- 60.
	黄丽娜. 研究网络亲社会参与: 概念、维度与测量——基于突发公共事件中社交媒体用户数据的实证. 国际新闻界, 2022, 44 (8): 49- 69.
	倪宇蕾. (2019). 解释偏向和感恩情绪对助人行为的影响(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 长沙.
	吴鹏, 范晶, 刘华山. 道德情绪对网络助人行为的影响——道德推理的中介作用. 心理学报, 2017, 49 (12): 1559- 1569.
	谢莹, 崔芳, 高鹏. 网络直播情境下共在临场感与社会临场感对从众消费的影响. 商业经济与管理, 2021, (2): 68- 79.
	岳童. (2016). 积极共情的认知神经机制研究(博士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
	张宝山, 金豆, 马梦佳, 徐冉. 消极刻板印象对老年人医疗决策的影响及归因偏差的作用. 心理学报, 2022, 54 (8): 951- 963.
	张璐, 乌云特娜, 金童林. I³模型视角下个体行为的表达机制. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29 (10): 1878- 1886.
	AlMoghrabi, N., Huijding, J., & Franken, I. H. A. The effects of a novel hostile interpretation bias modification paradigm on hostile interpretations, mood, and aggressive behavior. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2018, 58, 36- 42. DOI
	Beard, C., & Amir, N. A mufti-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008, 46 (10): 1135- 1141. DOI
	Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (2005). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective (15th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
	Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122−144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
	Catyanadika, P. E., & Rajasekera, J. Influence of psychological safety and social presence on knowledge sharing behavior in higher education online learning environment. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 2022, 52 (3): 335- 353.
	Chu, S. T. W., & Fung, H. H. L. Is the search for meaning related to the presence of meaning? Moderators of the longitudinal relationship. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2021, 22 (1): 127- 145. DOI
	Cummings, J. J., Tsay-Vogel, M., Cahill, T. J., & Zhang, L. Effects of immersive storytelling on affective, cognitive, and associative empathy: The mediating role of presence. New Media & Society, 2022, 24 (9): 2003- 2026.
	Davis, R. A. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17 (2): 187- 195. DOI
	Dhir, A., Khalil, A., Kaur, P., & Rajala, R. Rationale for “liking” on social networking sites. Social Science Computer Review, 2019, 37 (4): 529- 550. DOI
	Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. Development of a measure of adolescents’ online prosocial behavior. Journal of Children and Media, 2018, 12 (4): 448- 464.
	Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I³ model: Metatheory, theory, and evidence. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 1−104). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
	Gan, C. M. Understanding WeChat users’ liking behavior: An empirical study in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 68, 30- 39. DOI
	Gao, W., Liu, Z. P., & Li, J. Y. How does social presence influence SNS addiction? A belongingness theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017, 77, 347- 355. DOI
	Haines, R. Activity awareness, social presence, and motivation in distributed virtual teams. Information & Management, 2021, 58 (2): 103425.
	Jiang, J. Y., Meng, T. G., & Zhang, Q. From Internet to social safety net: The policy consequences of online participation in China. Governance, 2019, 32 (3): 531- 546. DOI
	Jiang, Y., Liao, J. Y., Chen, J. W., Hu, Y. H., & Du, P. Motivation for users’ knowledge-sharing behavior in virtual brand communities: A psychological ownership perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2022, 34 (10): 2165- 2183. DOI
	Jopling, E., Wilson, J., Burke, M., Tracy, A., & LeMoult, J. (2020). Positive interpretation bias across the psychiatric disorders. In T. Aue & H. Okon-Singer (Eds.), Cognitive biases in health and psychiatric disorders (pp. 99−117). London: Academic Press.
	Ma, Z. X. Effects of immersive stories on prosocial attitudes and willingness to help: Testing psychological mechanisms. Media Psychology, 2020, 23 (6): 865- 890. DOI
	Miers, A. C., Sumter, S. R., Clark, D. M., & Leigh, E. Interpretation bias in online and offline social environments and associations with social anxiety, peer victimization, and avoidance behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2020, 44 (4): 820- 833. DOI
	Ogara, S. O., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. Investigating factors affecting social presence and user satisfaction with mobile instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 36, 453- 459. DOI
	Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2018, 5, 114. DOI
	Pimentel, D., Kalyanaraman, S., Lee, Y. H., & Halan, S. Voices of the unsung: The role of social presence and interactivity in building empathy in 360 video. New Media & Society, 2021, 23 (8): 2230- 2254.
	Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
	Slater, M., & Banakou, D. The golden rule as a paradigm for fostering prosocial behavior with virtual reality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2021, 30 (6): 503- 509. DOI
	Srivastava, S. C., & Chandra, S. Social presence in virtual world collaboration: An uncertainty reduction perspective using a mixed methods approach. MIS Quarterly, 2018, 42 (3): 779- 803. DOI
	Steinman, S. A., Namaky, N., Toton, S. L., Meissel, E. E. E., St John, A. T., Pham, N. H., ... Teachman, B. A. Which variations of a brief cognitive bias modification session for interpretations lead to the strongest effects. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2021, 45 (2): 367- 382. DOI
	Ventura, S., Badenes-Ribera, L., Herrero, R., Cebolla, A., Galiana, L., & Baños, R. (2020). Virtual reality as a medium to elicit empathy: A meta-analysis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 667−676.
	Wang, H. Q., & Zhang, Z. Exploring how consumers’ purchasing behaviour is influenced in mobile webcast shopping context. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 2022, 20 (4): 462- 482. DOI

[1]	庞溢序, 彭梓轩, 李佳, 宋怡萱, 余萌. 利他的魔力：高社交焦虑大学生利己/利他行为对风险决策的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(4): 560-568.
[2]	于永菊, 何敏. 高校大学生生命意义感的演变模式及其与抑郁症状的关联[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(3): 354-360.
[3]	赵永耀, 张野, 薛培培, 张小南, 魏梦慧. 网络欺凌情境中受害者反应对旁观者建设性干预意愿的影响：状态共情的调节作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(2): 241-248.
[4]	王永胜, 韩洋, 李馨, 何立媛. 词间空格在维吾尔族大学生不同文本呈现方向的汉语句子阅读中的促进作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2025, 23(1): 41-48.
[5]	牛宏伟, 郝嘉佳, 白学军. 大学生失败心态量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(3): 379-386.
[6]	史滋福, 陈火红, 张艺瀚, 管锦亮, 夏笔奇, 靳紫阳. 父母直升机教养对大学生主观幸福感的影响：自我控制和抑郁的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2024, 22(1): 116-122.
[7]	巩彦斌, 杨海波. 体育锻炼与大学生智能手机成瘾的关系：创新行为和心理健康的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 770-775.
[8]	刘仁洁, 夏凌翔, 赵永萍. 大学生网络欺凌受害潜在类别的发展特点及性别因素的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 784-791.
[9]	占友龙, 江雪芬, 刘长林, 刘旭, 谭千保. 大学生自我担当对道德困境下亲社会行为意愿的影响：自我效能感和预期自豪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(6): 839-845.
[10]	刘海东, 虞芷筠, 叶宝娟, 杨强. 家庭亲密度与大学生抑郁：社交焦虑和感恩的作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(4): 556-563.
[11]	姚成奎, 常思琪, 郑传章, 陈维, 程刚, 罗杰. 简式大学生心理素质问卷的测量不变性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 312-319.
[12]	李丹枫, 闫星如, 刘倩. 大学生耐挫心理常模的制定—以北京市为例[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(3): 381-387.
[13]	兰泽波, 宋子明, 姜琨, 闫国利. 听障大学生汉语阅读中的绕口令效应：口语经验和阅读能力的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 20-27.
[14]	刘燊, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 宋明华. 自我厌恶与大学生同伴关系：抑郁和社会支持的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 102-108.
[15]	陈君楣, 吕勇. 自我同情对大学生拖延行为的影响：经验回避和羞耻的链式中介作用[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2023, 21(1): 109-115.

社会临场感对大学生网络亲社会行为的影响：基于I³模型的视角

The Effect of Social Presence on College Students’ Online Prosocial Behavior: The Perspective of I³ Model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 0

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价